Indirect searches for dark matter at Baikal
Dark Ghosts:
1st GNN Workshop on Indirect Dark Matter Searches Valencia, 10-11 April 2014
S.V.Demidov INR RAS
Neutrino signal from DM annihilations in the Sun
I We use NT-200 as a playground for studing of indirect DM searches technics
I Benchmark channels: b¯b, W+W−, τ+τ−,νeν¯e,νµν¯µ,ντν¯τ
I Expected muon neutrino and muon uxes from dark matter annihilation in the Sun
Φνµ = ΓA
4πR2 ×X
νj,ν¯j
Z mDM
Eth
dEνjPνµ(Eνj,Eth)dNνprodj
dEνj Pνµ(Eνj,Eth) - probability to obtain neutrino or muon at the detector level
Baikal Neutrino Telescope (NT200)
I 8 strings and 192 OM
I Angular resolution 4-5◦
I Energy thresholdEth≈10GeV
I data from April 1998 to February 2003
I Events towards the Sun
1e-12 1e-10 1e-08 1e-06 0.0001 0.01 1
10 100 1000 10000
Aνeff, m2
Eν, GeV no Sun track
Sun track
Expected number of events Nµ=RMDM
Eth dEνdΩAνeff(Eν,Ω)dEd2Nν
νdΩ
Indirect searches for dark matter at Baikal 3
Signal simulation: overview and parameters
I We use our C program; compare results with WIMPsim and PPPC
I Initial neutrino spectra at the center of the Sun: PYTHIA
I Annihilation point near the center of the Sun
I Neutrino oscillations,3×3scheme
I Matter eects: solar model, J.N.Bahcall, A.M.Serenelli½ S.Basu (2005). We should improve here.
I NC and CC interactions (including τ-mass eects) in the Sun and the Earth: change in neutrino uxes and spectra
I ντ regeneration:ντ →τ−+...,τ− →ντ,ν¯e,ν¯µ+... - secondary neutrinos
Comparison with WIMPsim: ν
µspectra at 1 a.u.
For the same initial neutrino spectra
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 dNν/dz (ann-1)
z=Eν/mDM bb, mDM = 100 GeV
νµ at production WimpSim, νµ at 1 a.u.
our calculations, νµ at 1 a.u.
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 dNν/dz (ann-1)
z=Eν/mDM
W+W-, mDM = 100 GeV νµ at production ντ at production WimpSim, νµ at 1 a.u.
our calculations, νµ at 1 a.u.
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 dNν/dz (ann-1)
z=Eν/mDM τ+τ-, mDM = 100 GeV
ντ at production νµ at production WimpSim, νµ at 1 a.u.
our calculations, νµ at 1 a.u.
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 dNν/dz (ann-1)
z=Eν/mDM
W+W-, mDM = 1000 GeV νµ at production ντ at production WimpSim, νµ at 1 a.u.
our calculations, νµ at 1 a.u.
Indirect searches for dark matter at Baikal 5
PPPC 4 DM ν
I New calculation neutrino energy spectra by M.Cirelli, A.Strumia et.al arXiv:1312.6408, JCAP (2014)
I GEANT 4 to simulate propagation of annihilation products in the Sun, in particular eect of secondary products
I EW corrections to spectra: radiation of soft electroweak bosons enhance EW corrections by powers of logMDM/MZ
I Neutrino spectra at production and at the Earth are availible for particular solar model and particular oscillation parameters.
PPPC 4 DM ν : comparison with other spectra
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 dNν/dz (ann-1)
z=Eν/mDM bb, mDM = 100 GeV WimpSim, νµ at 1 a.u.
our calculations, νµ at 1 a.u.
EW corrections, νµ at 1 a.u.
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 dNν/dz (ann-1)
z=Eν/mDM
W+W-, mDM = 100 GeV WimpSim, νµ at 1 a.u.
our calculations, νµ at 1 a.u.
EW corrections, νµ at 1 a.u.
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 dNν/dz (ann-1)
z=Eν/mDM
bb, mDM = 1000 GeV WimpSim, νµ at 1 a.u.
our calculations, νµ at 1 a.u.
EW corrections, νµ at 1 a.u.
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 dNν/dz (ann-1)
z=Eν/mDM
W+W-, mDM = 1000 GeV WimpSim, νµ at 1 a.u.
our calculations, νµ at 1 a.u.
EW corrections, νµ at 1 a.u.
Indirect searches for dark matter at Baikal 7
Comparison of dierent spectra
Eective areas normalized to those obtain with WimpSim spectra
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Seff/SWSeff
mDM, GeV bb
our calculations Strumia et.al., 2013
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Seff/SWSeff
mDM, GeV τ+τ-
our calculations Strumia et.al., 2013 0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Seff/SWSeff
mDM, GeV W+W-
our calculations Strumia et.al., 2013
Considerable corrections! Sensitivity tobb¯ increases, while to W+W− decreases!
Muon ux calculation
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
dNµ/dγ (1/Nµ)
γ (deg) τ+τ-, mDM = 90 GeV
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
dNµ/dγ (1/Nµ)
γ (deg) bb, mDM = 90 GeV
I Muons are produced in neutrino CC interactions
I Mean muon energy losses in rock (D.E.Groom, N.V.Mokhov, S.I.Striganov, 2001)
hdEdxi=−(α(E) +β(E)E)ρ
I Multiple Coulomb scattering
Indirect searches for dark matter at Baikal 9
Neutrino from the Sun and optimization
expected limit on neutrino ux≈ AνN¯90(γ) eff(γ)×T
The eective area for given spectrum Aνeff(γ) =
RmDM
Eth dEνA(Eν,Eth)Pµ(Eν,θ)dNν(EνdEν ) RmDM
Eth dEνPµ(Eν,θ)dNνdEν(Eν)
Upper limit- using TRolke root class
°) -Sun( Ψµ
0 5 10 15 20 25
Events per bin
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Data Apr_1998 - Feb_2003 years
Measured background Background fit
1e-10 1e-08 1e-06 0.0001 0.01 1
10 100 1000 10000
Aeffν, m2
Eν or mDM, GeV bb
W+W- τ+τ- νeνe νµνµ ντντ total
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
10 100 1000 10000
Ψ (°)
bbτ+τ- W+W-
Upper limits on neutrino ux
Φlimν = ANν90(γ)
eff×T, recalculated on Eν >1GeV;
1e+09 1e+10 1e+11 1e+12 1e+13 1e+14 1e+15 1e+16 1e+17 1e+18
10 100 1000 10000
Φν, km-2 yr-1
mDM, GeV
Baikal 1998-2003, bb Baikal 1998-2003, W+W- Baikal 1998-2003, τ+τ- Baikal 1998-2003, νeνe Baikal 1998-2003, νµνµ Baikal 1998-2003, ντντ
Indirect searches for dark matter at Baikal 11
Upper limits on muon neutrino ux
Φlimν = ANν90(γ)
eff×T, recalculated on Eν >1GeV;
1e-08 1e-07 1e-06 1e-05 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
10 100 1000 10000
Φν, cm-2 s-1
mDM, GeV
IceCube 2012, hard IceCube 2012, bb ANTARES 2007-2008, W+W- ANTARES 2007-2008, bb ANTARES 2007-2008, τ+τ- Baksan 1978-2009, W+W- Baksan 1978-2009, bb Baksan 1978-2009, τ+τ- Baikal 1998-2003, W+W- (pr.) Baikal 1998-2003, bb (pr.) Baikal 1998-2003, τ+τ- (pr.) Baikal 1998-2003, νeνe (pr.) Baikal 1998-2003, νµνµ (pr.) Baikal 1998-2003, ντντ (pr.)
Recalculation to upper limits on SD
G. Wikstrom, J. Edsjo, 2009
I Firstly, we recalculateΦµ→ΓA
I In equilibrium between capture and annihilation processes:
ΓA =CDM/2
I Capture rate is determined by the SI and SD elastic cross section of DM particles on nucleons (Gould, 1987)
I Recalculation ΓA→σSDp , σSIp (Olga Suvorova, S.D., 2010)
ΓA = ΓSDA + ΓSIA, σpSD
ΓSDA ·ΓUpp.Lim.A =σSD,Upp.Lim.
p , σpSI
ΓSIA ·ΓUpp.Lim.A =σSI,Upp.Lim.
p
I Upper limits on SD cross sections are strong - a lot of hydrogen in the Sun
Indirect searches for dark matter at Baikal 13
Upper limits on SD elastic cross section: indirect searches
1e-40 1e-39 1e-38 1e-37 1e-36 1e-35
10 100 1000 10000
σχpSD, cm2
mDM, GeV
ANTARES 2007-2008, bb ANTARES 2007-2008, W+W-
ANTARES 2007-2008 τ+τ- Super-K 2011, bb Super-K 2011, W+W-
IceCube 2012, bb IceCube 2012, hard Baksan 1978-2009, bb Baksan 1978-2009, W+W-
Baksan 1978-2009, τ+τ- Baikal 1998-2003, bb Baikal 1998-2003, W+W-
Baikal 1998-2003, τ+τ-
Upper limits on SD: direct and collider searches
1e-40 1e-39 1e-38 1e-37 1e-36 1e-35
10 100 1000 10000
σχpSD, cm2
mDM, GeV
DAMA no channeling 2008 PICASSO 2012
KIMS 2011 SIMPLE 2011
COUPP 2012 Baikal 1998-2003, bb Baikal 1998-2003, W+W-
Baikal 1998-2003, τ+τ- Baikal 1998-2003, νeνe Baikal 1998-2003, νµνµ
Baikal 1998-2003, ντντ
Indirect searches for dark matter at Baikal 15
Systematic uncertanties
I Experimental uncertanties NT200:≈30%.
I Inuence of uncertanty in neutrino oscillation parameters on propagation: ≈5% for W+W− andb¯b,≈8% for τ+τ−
I Inuence of neutrino nucleon cross section on propagation in the Sun and the Earth - up to 10% for Eν ∼10 GeV and 4%
for Eν ∼1 TeV.
I Contribution of tau-neutrinos to the muon events - around 6%.
I Considerable corrections from new neutrino spectra at production!
I For limits on SD and SI cross sections: astrophysical uncertanties (chemical composition of the Sun, local dark matter density ρχ, DM velocity distribution, ...)
Thank you!
Indirect searches for dark matter at Baikal 17
Comparison of upper limits for W
+W
−and τ
+τ
−channels
I Comparable limits on muon uxes
I Number of neutrinos (and antineutrinos) per annihilation:
≈1.0 forW+W− and≈2.6 forτ+τ−
I Eect of oscillations
0 1 2 3 4 5
10 100 1000
Φµ, osc/Φµ, noosc
mDM, GeV
bb W+W- τ+τ-