MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHANGES IN THE OFFER OF DIPLOMAS (SINGLE AND DOUBLE DIPLOMAS). Nevertheless, the indicators presented and the conclusions drawn from them are the sole responsibility of the U-Ranking team. The first of these rankings is the U-ranking, which analyzes the performance of the university system and groups universities.
The 9th edition of U-Ranking contains an additional analysis of the range of degrees offered by the Spanish University System (SUE). What determines the intensity of the changes in the degrees offered in the different universities. The added value4 of the indicators is presented on a scale from 0 (minimum value obtained by a university of the system) to 100 (value given to the university that achieves the most points).
The results are compared at the level of the university systems of the different autonomous communities.
Methodology
- THE DESIGN OF RANKINGS
- ACTIVITIES STUDIED
- DISAGGREGATION OF ACTIVITIES
- INDICATORS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS
- PERIOD COVERED BY THE DATA University rankings aspire to offer an image of the
- CRITERIA FOR THE
- Constructing the database and missing data
- Standardization of indicators One of the pillars upon which the construction of
- Weighting and aggregation of indicators within an area
- Weighting and aggregation of the area indicators within each dimension
- Weighting and aggregation of the dimensions to obtain the rankings
- PERFORMANCE RANKINGS VS
- Interest of the two approaches Another reason to pay attention to this aspect is
- Treatment of the size of universities
- PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES
The quality of research is reflected in the impact that publications have and the citations these articles generate. In the case of U-ranked universities, 16 of the 20 indicators are obtained by field of study, and the remaining four are for the university as a whole. For the remaining four indicators, the value of the university for all study areas is taken into account.
In the case of the research activity dimension, areas of study without full-time equivalents of faculty members with a PhD are not taken into account. This occurs, for example, with the average impact of the publications index and its percentage in the first quartile. Weighting and aggregation of the dimensions to obtain the ranking. Dimensions to obtain the ranking.
Due to the characteristics of private universities, one of the indicators defined in the methodology.
User personalized rankings
EXAMPLES OF PERSONALIZED RANKINGS
DESCRIPTION OF THE WEB TOOL FOR GENERATING PERSONALIZED
The user can select one or several options in the first two questions (one or several scales; one, several or all autonomous communities). The degree names displayed in the drop-down list are neither exhaustive nor verbatim, as those bachelor degrees with very similar names are grouped together, such as In this case, their interest will be to know which of the studies offered are best rated in the territories the student is considering.
Either way, complementary information is available to position their options in relation to the rest of the offers in the Spanish university system. As shown in the table, the only change is in the breakdown level column. Thus, 9 of the 20 indicators included in the calculation of the synthetic index of an individual degree are analyzed at the level of a degree or group of degrees.
The more than 185,000 personal locations that have been calculated testify to the interest in the tool.
COMPLEMENTARY
Main results
U-RANKING
En primer lugar la Universitat Pompeu Fabra, que por primera vez comparte ranking con otras dos universidades: la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid y la Politècnica de Catalunya. Alcalá, Pablo Olavide, Universitat de València, Universitat de Girona, Universitat Jaume I de Castellón y dos universidades privadas, IE Universidad y Universitat Ramon Llull. Los cambios más importantes son el ascenso de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid y la Politècnica de Catalunya del segundo al primer puesto junto con Pompeu Fabra, la entrada directa al cuarto puesto del IE Universidad, que aparece por primera vez en el ranking, el ascenso de La Universidad de Deusto y Jaume I del cuarto al tercer puesto, y la caída de una posición de la Universitat de Lleida.
U-RANKING VOLUME
U-RANKING VOLUME VS
RANKING PERFORMANCE
- U-RANKING VS. SHANGHAI RANKING
- COMPARISON OF RESULTS WITH OTHER INTERNATIONAL RANKINGS
- RESEARCH VS. TEACHING
- TEACHING AND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION RANKINGS
- PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
- U-RANKING 2020 AND 2021 The aim of this section is to evaluate the stability
- REGIONAL UNIVERSITY SYSTEMS
Spain ranks seventh in the figure when looking at the 1,000 universities in the rankings. Both were included in the Top 500 of the Shanghai Ranking 2020 this year and are in intermediate positions in the U-Ranking. Please note: The 13 Spanish universities in the Top 500 of the Shanghai Ranking 2020 and the first 20 and 19 universities in U-Ranking Volume and U-Ranking are included.
Ten other universities are in the first quartile in two rankings: Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Shanghai and U-Ranking;. Effects of changing the weight assigned to research in the U-ranking on top-ranked universities. Given the total weight of public universities in the university system, this sample is considered to be the system average.
The median for the total number of universities in the distribution of the indices is 1 (see Figure 4.12, panels a1 and b1).
Ranking 2020
Ranking 2021
Changes in bachelor’s degree programs offered in the last decade
- METHODOLOGY
- MAIN FEATURES OF THE CHANGES IN THE OFFERING OF
- Changes in the offering of degrees be- tween 2010 and 2021
- Effect of the changes for new students
- FIT BETWEEN THE NEW OFFER- ING AND STUDENT DEMAND IN PUB-
- THE NEW OFFERING AND LABOR MARKET SIGNALS
- DETERMINANTS OF THE CHANGES IN DEGREE PROGRAMS
In sections 5.2 to 5.4, we describe the changes in the offer of educations from different perspectives, noting differences in the intensity of the changes between the universities. MAIN FEATURES OF THE CHANGES IN THE OFFER OF THE CHANGES IN THE OFFER OF DEGREES (SINGLE DEGREES AND DOUBLE DEGREES). Out of the total increase of 36.5% in the number of programs from the public universities, 15 percentage points (pp) can be attributed to the increase in single degrees and 21.5 pp to the increase in double degrees.
Universities and regional university systems To complete our overall analysis of the intensity of changes in supply, figure 5.6 shows the number of degrees currently offered by each university and the percentage of new degrees, ranked by percentage of new degrees (αi´) . However, large increases in the number of degrees offered are more frequent in small and private universities, many of which have been established recently. The average percentage of new single degrees is high in private universities and low in public ones.
The reform of the provision of degrees in the university system has gradually affected the composition of students, as students register and progress to new degrees. In this section we analyze the effect of changes in degree provision by observing students who are able to choose between new and old degrees each year. The number of new students followed a downward trend during that period due to the reduction in the size of the university age group.
At the university level, these observations result in changes in the number of new students, shown in Figure 5.11, with growth (in some cases rapid growth) at most private universities and a decline (again in some cases a sharp decline) at most private universities . public universities. The fit is 7 pp higher for the new degrees than for the rest of the degrees in the SUPE as a whole and 10 pp higher for Sciences and Social and Legal Sciences. The size of the circle is proportional to the number of new students who register for the new courses.
The size of the circles represents the number of new students enrolled in new degrees in the 2020-2021 academic year. In both cases, the intensity of the changes is greater than in the reference community, although with a different sign (positive in Castile-La Mancha and negative in the Valencian Community).
Conclusions
The leadership of some of these universities is particularly outstanding in research and innovation. Five out of the eight universities with a high level of performance in teaching are private. Thus, the average level of the teaching results of private universities may be lower if U-Ranking includes all the private universities.
The two factors of change have been the creation of new programs at young private universities and the restructuring of the offerings of the established universities. The total number of programs has increased considerably, and many of the new programs are smaller (in number of students), at least for the time being, than the previous ones. The supply of new programs as a percentage of the total number of programs is thus much greater than the number of students who register for the new program.
Within this general framework, presented below are some relevant results of the analysis included in the 9th edition of U-Ranking. Intense, wide variation in degree offerings is found across all five subject areas. The changes have been more intense in three families of diplomas in the subject area of Social Sciences (social studies and administration, law, and economics and business), one in Arts and Humanities (artistic studies), two in Sciences (physics and mathematics). ), two in Engineering and Architecture (computer science and telecommunications, and industrial engineering) and two in Health Sciences (pharmacy and psychology).
Over 190 degrees that are new not only to a particular university, but to the Spanish university system as a whole, are concentrated in the families of degrees in which the changes have been most intense. During the analyzed decade, with the increase in the number of diplomas, the number of new students decreased for demographic reasons. This advantage of private universities is also evident, to a greater or lesser extent, in different subject areas and degree families.
Despite the problems mentioned above, public universities continue to attract the majority of the total number of students enrolling in the Spanish university system, as well as the majority of those enrolling in new degrees (56.4% compared to 43.6% in private universities). At the level of graduate families, public universities lead in 14 families and private universities in 12 out of a total of 26.
Glossary of Indicators
List of University Abbreviations
Ranking 2021 indicators
Ranking 2021 performance and volume indices
MONDRAGON UNIBERTSITATEA
See www.u-ranking.es for methodological details on the definition and calculation of the indicators and indices. Budget/Student Faculty Member with PhD/Faculty Members Success Rate Evaluation Rate Non-Dropout Rate. Competing public resources/Faculty member PhD Research staff contracts/budget Scientific documents/Faculty member PhD Number of patents/Faculty member PhD Dissertations read/Faculty member PhD Average impact factor.
UNIVERSIDAD A DISTANCIA DE MADRID
UNIVERSIDAD ALFONSO X EL SABIO
UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID
UNIVERSIDAD CAMILO JOSÉ CELA
UNIVERSIDAD CARDENAL HERRERA CEU
UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE
VALENCIA SAN VICENTE MÁRTIR
UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE
UNIVERSIDAD DE ALCALÁ
UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE
UNIVERSIDAD DE ALMERÍA
UNIVERSIDAD DE BURGOS
UNIVERSIDAD DE CÁDIZ
UNIVERSIDAD DE CANTABRIA
UNIVERSIDAD DE CASTILLA-LA MANCHA
UNIVERSIDAD DE CÓRDOBA
UNIVERSIDAD DE DEUSTO
UNIVERSIDAD DE EXTREMADURA
UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA
UNIVERSIDAD DE HUELVA
UNIVERSIDAD DE JAÉN
UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA
UNIVERSIDAD DE LA RIOJA
UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA
UNIVERSIDAD DE LEÓN
UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA
UNIVERSIDAD DE NAVARRA
UNIVERSIDAD DE OVIEDO
UNIVERSIDAD DE SALAMANCA
UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA
UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID
UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA
UNIVERSIDAD DEL PAÍS VASCO
UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE CANARIAS
UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID
UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE VALENCIA
UNIVERSIDAD INTERNACIONAL DE LA RIOJA
UNIVERSIDAD INTERNACIONAL ISABEL I DE CASTILLA
UNIVERSIDAD INTERNACIONAL VALENCIANA
UNIVERSIDAD MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ DE ELCHE
UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA
UNIVERSIDAD NEBRIJA
UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE
UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE CARTAGENA
UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID
UNIVERSIDAD PONTIFICIA COMILLAS
UNIVERSIDAD PÚBLICA DE NAVARRA
UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS
UNIVERSIDAD SAN PABLO CEU
UNIVERSIDADE DA CORUÑA
UNIVERSIDADE DE SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA
UNIVERSIDADE DE VIGO
UNIVERSITAT ABAT OLIBA CEU
UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA
UNIVERSITAT DE BARCELONA
UNIVERSITAT DE GIRONA
UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS
UNIVERSITAT DE LLEIDA
UNIVERSITAT DE VALÈNCIA
UNIVERSITAT DE VIC - U
CENTRAL DE CATALUNYA
UNIVERSITAT INTERNACIONAL DE CATALUNYA
UNIVERSITAT JAUME I
UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA
UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA
UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA
UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA
UNIVERSITAT RAMON LLULL
UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI
Ti baro a multi-dimensional ken user-driven a konsepto ti European Union Higher Education Ranking. Panag-analisar ti itukon ti panagadal ti diploma kadagiti publiko ken pribado nga unibersidad ti Espania. Panagranggo ti panagsukisok a rimmuar dagiti unibersidad a naibatay iti multidimensional a dayaw dagiti impluensial a tay-ak: Dagiti unibersidad ti Espania a kas pagarigan ti panagadal.
Available at: http://ireg-observatory.org/en_old/pdfy/IREG-Guidelines-14-may-2015.pdf MARGINSON, S.
