6.2. Diseño de la redistribución de planta
6.2.4. Evaluación de las propuestas de redistribución
]'lute 1 5 .
Plate 1 6 ,
'l'he har.d SlJr::cy 2 pp<Jratus ·.1i th ooo:� 2.nd nro t e c tive baffl e s u s e d t o :1::ply Lu:.(;'icici�s t o th:- : _ r-:�' t:reated plo t s .
Petri ciishes of c,ro�.J.nd. c <::.1) sule sho•
..
:in�· [TO\It!l o f( 1 )
llelninthosporium,( 2)
Alt er::1aria,( 3 )
Clados porium,(4)
l11oi s t contro l ,(
5)
Dry contro l ,108.
6.2.3. �ascussio�
It is quite clear frot'l th-J data giver.
in
T�ble41 that
both t:.e .: 1 tarr.aria E and the ::el;::inthos.•or:.um .2,2 :'ur1,;i dr�ticai.ly reduceC.capsule mo�hine to less that one t
e
nthof the
levelin the
dry, ��invculatedcontr
o
lR. .Uso the isolation ofAltern'-"!"h
.:!.£ wd .§E. from the seed conf:..r:ned tr.e visual evidance oft
hemicroscopic observation (?h•te
14)
that fungi do_per.etrate and disrupt the ce�lular structure �,c enter the interior of th� capsule .'l'�£. fact that Clados-co::-ium did not reduce morphine concentr2.tion significr,ntly belO\v tr.c:.t of t
h
e dry unir10culated control rna:;be
a re!'l ection of the ex:;>erirr.ental
::;etl!od used.
had a sloH
ra.te o!.' lc.tc::::-1 spread onthe
surface of the groundca
psule ar.d sven after 24 daJ·s diu not co::�pletel.f cove::.- the suriaoe. 'fhehigh
I:".ois
ture
level of the capsule :�e�i·.;m ca;-tl:ave
iP-1--ti. bited its s-,,re?.d r.r:C. thus li::ited
t!":epo
s:::ib
ili
tyof
r�vr;,hi r:a bre<kC.cwr.. On this c>s)?ect ?o:!.lsti!d(1966)
re.:orted th;:t aera
tion <J<l!? a vi tal fac �e>r inthe
c,--:::.-o,;thof Cl
zdos
oori '.lr.1 herbarum.
In additionto tr.!
g ,tv�s the dominant f1.m,;us c
ol
on
izir.s the surface of ccpsules
ir:th
e
field tric>.lat �ortl.side (
sectio
n2 . 4 . )
ar:d one of thet.;o
repo
rted
by lr..iczulska( 1967)
as bein.1associated
·,:1 tht:.or�,hine losses
i::l :'olish ex; criments .
A
po
int of so.:1eilr._;Jor':;er:ce in this ex_,erin:ent
was the fact -�;::::t the moist, uninoculated
cor:trol 1�e.s si&-nii'icantl:r lo;.1ar in mor;:hir.c th�..nt·'!e
dryuninocul;.ted
ca?sule J:ii"terial (.Table 4 1 ) .This
may imyly sorr.e
f�r::� o: hydrolytic breakcown of corphine andcan ce
co. rp
ared "i th th� obse�a.1:icn c:Kopp ( 1957)
th:t harvested ca,sules stored i:l a!::oist c>.t.rosphere s!-.o·.>ed
significant red
u
ction in
morphinec
onte
nt.
6.
3. T'ne Assoc
ioti
on beb1een
:'Ul�··Cll Co.lor.is
ation
-:-r.cl :-
.or-ohxr.e Conce!" tration ofIntact
caosu!es.6.
3 . 1 .
?nd I ethodsleYels \�as studied
in
a2 x 2
factorial at Forthside Vegetable :lef:earch3tation. T!le p'iots
•,;ere
drilled3rd October 1971
'Nitht-:o
= 2ero , a11d ?!1200
kg/ha �� asan.:noniuru
suJ.pho.te. Concentrated supcrphc·sph.:.te �1as ap;:liedto give PO � zero and
P1
=200
kJ/haP.
All treatrr:ents had contactP
applied ·
.
.;i th the seedto
,;i ve 2<: k�/h::!.P.
A 1'asnl<'-''1ian cultivar was d:.-.:lledin
200
;m rows cnti tl:e plot size 'lias e . :; :nelreslone-
and1 , 6
rnetr<.:s v:ice.The plots were laid out in a randornised block ·.oli th
four
replications. Atharvest or. t:::e
28th
Februa171972
the cou.b\ned ter..nir:al �nd lateral ca!-•£UlesHere di vid�d
irao
three
sue-plot catetS"ories cie;lending on the perce:1ta:;·eof
the total :::urf..:ce ar:?o. wh
i
ch •·tas colonisedby
funbi. The thr�ecatee;ories
•11ere judc1ei
by eye
as folloHs :- Sli
esht = Q-10;�, I<:edium =1 1-30;�.
�ev�re "'30;�.
6. ), 2.
l�esul ts t,s t:1ere �1ere
nc intcr�ctior.s
betw�en fertiliser treat:..ent ��d !rfecti0n cr.tesorie3 tte oo=phir.econce�tratic�s
ofC?vsules
are setout
ir.
:Cable 43 as the :.1eans of tnefour
fertiliser treatment for each infection category.T?.ble The e::ect of level of
!r:fection
on the a.e�n �or�hine contnnt nf intactc
acs:.�'!esInfection :ate5cry
Jotorphine (%-)
Slight
1.)4
l'·:edi•.un
1 . 1 9
::>evere
1 . 07
:..s.D.
p <. 0.05
0.07
P <. 0.01
0.09
Table 44 records 1;he pcrce�tage of the -total
num'oer
of cc.psules f:er plot which werein
the severe infection catesory.1 10 .
'!'able
44.
The effect of fert
jlizer
tr
eat
�:ent
on the nr·ouortion of tot'llnu:nher of C<l:'l�ules 'Cer ':llot in the: severe i!'1f�ct
ion
Po