• No se han encontrado resultados

Evaluando la SETAI en el gobierno de Valentín Paniagua .1 Iniciando la evaluación de la SETAI

As outlined above, the purpose of this research is to design and develop a professional learning programme for tourism at university level. This means there will be a requirement to investigate existing or secondary research in this area through the various stakeholders (i.e. GAU, accrediting bodies, students and the tourism sector). This research will first establish the context and purpose, and in conclusion support the construction of the AR; secondly, it will assess what is required by way of content, which could be understood as the planning action that paves the way for action on the knowledge gained for the professional learning programme, which I refer to as taking action. Once the design is complete the various stakeholders will be invited to give their views on the research, by which means the research will arrive at the evaluating the action stage, where I will reflect on these views and, if necessary, further construct, plan and take action, and again evaluate. This methodology will allow the research to be accurate in terms of its content, which is important for research of this nature. This action research includes the design, delivery and structure of a blended teaching programme determined by the requirements of a variety of stakeholders. Two cycles of action research will be employed: one will identify the main requirements through interviews during the planning action stage (and action taken to design the programme, which I evaluate in the first cycle); and in the second cycle I enter the process that will re-construct, and plan actions, followed by taking the actions, based on a focus group, and then evaluation and revision of the findings, thereby repeating the cycle again, as in Figure 3.5.

CONSTRUCTION: Study of macro/micro environment and outline of research requirements

Table 3.1 below is an outline of the different methods to be adopted during the research process in accordance with the set objectives:

PLANNING ACTION:

Invitation and interviews with stakeholders

TAKING ACTION:

Design of the new programme

EVALUATING ACTION:

Compare secondary data with primary

CONSTRUCTION:

Justification of designed programme

PLANNING ACTION: Preparation of venue, questions, moderator and design of focus . Invitation of

stakeholders to focus group

TAKING ACTION:

Hold focus group

EVALUATING ACTION: Revise

programme

CYCLE TWO

Table 3.1 Research objectives and methods

RESEARCH AIM OBJECTIVES DATA COLLECTION

INSTRUMENT STAKEHOLDERS AND RELEVENT ASSOCIATIONS DATA To research the requirements of the stakeholders in tourism education and develop an apprenticeship programme at GAU

1. To carry out a detailed literature review of apprenticeships and their development, particularly examples in Europe.

Action research – Planning Secondary research

Hıgher Educatıon in Britain, Austria, Germany and Switzerland

Secondary

2. To study the demands and requirements of different stakeholders to include GAU, GAU students, accrediting bodies and sector representatives.

 Action research – Planning and action  Secondary research  Primary research  Semi-structured

interviews

 Teaching in GAU STHM  Accrediting bodies, GAU  Sectoral representatives:  Hoteliers Association President  Travel Agencies Association President  Restaurateurs Association President  Students in the two-year

programme

 Existing programmes  Existing rules, regulations

and report feedback  Qualitative:

 Summary of skills and theoretical requirements for future employees

 Summary of theoretical, skill-based and social expectations from future employees

3. To study how the North Cyprus education system – with its “hard” and “soft” factors – fits in.

 Action research – Action  Secondary research  Research from websites, informal interviews

 TRNC Education Ministry and representatives, chambers of commerce for businesses and shopkeepers, and representatives

 Qualitative summary of hard and soft factors related to the subject area

4. To develop and adopt an apprenticeship-style programme that fulfils the requirements of all stakeholders.

 Action research – Action  Committee focus group  Semi-structured

ıntervıews wıth students

 Accrediting body representative, GAU and Middlesex University  Sectorial representatives:  Hoteliers Association President  Travel Agencies Association

President

 Restaurateurs Association President

 Students in the two-year programme

 Qualitative:

 Summary of skills and theoretical requirements for future employees

 Summary of theoretical, skill-based and social expectations from future employees

5. To create awareness of a “new” style of education in North Cyprus that can be used as a model nationally.

 Action research – Monitoring and reflection

 Committee focus group

 Accrediting body representative and GAU

 Sectorial representatives:  Hoteliers Association President  Travel Agencies Association

President

 Restaurateurs Association President

 Students

As outlined in Table 3.1, I intend to adopt AR within the overall qualitative research framework because I am concerned with various stakeholders’ views and opinions. My project design is proposed to be conducted in the Action Research Cycle Model, as in Figure 3.6:

As seen above, a variety of stakeholders will be interviewed in the AR cycle, requiring qualitative research and inter-dynamic networking.

CONSTRUCT

Secondary Research on:

1. Current programmes, rules and regulations at GAU STHM 2. Rules and regulations with YOK, YODAK

3. TEDQUAL, rules and regulations

4. Sectorial research conducted in the area

5. Letters to sector inviting them for research participation

PLAN ACTION

Primary research (methodology) & applying the programme:

1. In-depth interviews with stakeholders a. Academic responsible persons at GAU b. Accrediting bodies

c. GAU STHM students in two-year programme

d. Sector representatives 2. Semi-structured interviews of key

stakeholders 3. Design a focus group

TAKE ACTION

Design the programme Conduct a focus group

EVALUATE ACTION

Feedback on designed programme: 1. Stakeholders

a. Academic responsible persons at GAU b. Accrediting bodies

c. GAU STHM students in two-yearprogramme d. Sector representatives

2. Revise programme for feedback

3. Adopt the new programme