CAPÍTULO II: ÁMBITO DE APLICACIÓN SUBJETIVO Y CALIFICACIÓN DE LAS
B. La configuración de establecimiento permanente en los CCE
2. Factor subjetivo: fijeza del lugar y permanencia en el tiempo
and supported the apostates against the Muwahhidīn. It is also well-known that the British sent their Captain Forester Sadler to meet with Abraham Pasha, 691 the viceroy of Egypt, to
thank and congratulate him for his destruction of the stronghold of the Salafī Da’wah in Ad- Dir’iyyah. The two men also spoke about wiping out the “Wahhābī pirates” around the entire Gulf and helping the British Empire in doing so. 692
685 The Shaykh is referring to the Third Nullification of Islām, “Whoever does not make Takfīr to the mushrikīn, or doubts their kufr, or approves of their Math’hab, he has disbelieved”.
686 Since it is one of the Ten Nullifications of Islām. So again this is a clear verdict from the Imām that Muthāharah is “obvious apostasy”.
687 “Ad-Durar As-Saniyyah” (8/242 and 10/429)
688 Again this is further evidence that assisting the kuffār against the Muslims, with any type of
assistance, is kufr.
689 “Refer to Dīwān Ibn Sahmān” (191). 690 “‘Ulamā’ Ad-Da’wah” (56)
691 1789-1848. The Greek-born son of Mahomet Ali Pasha (1769-1849). Their native town was
Kavala, Greece. Both, father and son, were viceroys representing Egypt on behalf of the Ottoman Sultan, although they were considered to be virtually independent. He inherited the authority over Egypt from his father. Both crusaded against the Salafī Da’wah upon the decree from the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire.
692 Refer to the Arabic translation of the travels of Captain Forester Sadler - “Al-Kābtin Fūristir Sādlīr, Rihlah ‘Ibar Al-Jazīrah Al-‘Arabiyyah”. Translated by Anas Ar-Rifā’ī.
And historians say that the correspondence letters clearly show that Abraham Pasha and the British Empire were united in their goal to completely annihilate the “Wahhābīs”. 693 And
the Indian historian, Mas’ūd An-Nadwī, also comes to the same conclusion. 694
It is obvious from the historic records, that the European kuffār extremely despised “Wahhābism”. And this is why we find that the British labeled any Muslim that opposed them in the Indian sub-continent as a “Wahhābī”. 695
It should also be mentioned that Abraham Pasha’s army had a Frenchman as its Chief of Staff. He was Colonel Séve, who supposedly “converted” to Islām after the Ottoman Empire hired him to train their army according to the “European” method. He then changed his identity to “Suleiman Pasha Al-Faransawī”.
And as it was mentioned before, Abraham Pasha is the one who executed Shaykh Sulaymān Ibn ‘Abdillāh ﷲا ﻪﻤﺣر, by ordering his squadron to nail him to a cross, and then fire at him with their bullets until his body was completely torn to pieces.
And it is also of significance that Queen Victoria invited Abraham Pasha to London. And obviously the slave obeys the master; thus when he visited London in 1846, he was thanked for his “heroic campaigns”; and he was received by Queen Victoria as “one of the most prominent military leaders”.
And even Abraham Pasha’s father, Mahomet Ali Pasha was famous for his servitude towards his leash-holders in London. One of the English colonialists, Frasier, sent a letter to General Moore saying, “Indeed Mahomet Ali Pasha, the governor of Egypt, has shown great aspiration to place himself under the patronage of the British. So we have promised him that we would relay his proposals to the leaders and commanders of the British Military, that they could later transmit his proposals to the English Government so that they could also have a look at it.” 696
And researchers in Europe have also discovered some letters and pacts which were exchanged in between Napoleon Bonaparte, the emperor of France, and a senior Ottoman governor, Albāb Al-‘Ālī. These documents speak explicitly regarding the Salafī Da’wah, and the necessity of taking action to repel them, and the threats that the Da’wah posed against the interests of the French in the Middle East. 697
These facts should be pondered upon by the fellow brethren who are upon Sunnah and Tawhīd. They should look at how all these points are consistent with today. Still, the foreign kuffār order the apostate regimes to capture and annihilate the Muwahhidīn. Their Foreign
693 Refer to (156-157) of the above mentioned book.
694 Refer to “Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhāb, Muslih Mathlūm” (121, 123).
695 “Da’āyāt Mukath’thafah Dhidd Ash-Shaykh Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhāb” (105-106).
696 Refer to the history of the 19th century of Egypt, “Misr Fī Matla’ Al-Qarn Al-Tāsi’ ‘Ashar” (856-
857).
697 Refer to the introduction of Shaykh ‘Atiyyah Sālim ﻪﻤﺣرﷲا to “Al-Imām Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdil- Wahhāb” by Shaykh Ibn Bāz ﻪﻤﺣرﷲا . The researcher was Dr. Ahmad At-Tuwayl, he discovered these papers while preparing his doctorate thesis.
Ministers and Defense Ministers visit the palaces and mansions of the apostates; and likewise, the apostates pay visits to their masters’ castles. What do they discuss? They discuss - while having champagne - capturing the Muwahhidīn, killing them, spying on them, assassinating them, deporting them, and “cracking down” on them. They discuss every type of Tawallī and Muwālāt and riddah that they can possibly think of.
So O Brother of Tawhīd! Think about these points mentioned above, and ask yourself: Which “Wahhābīs” are falsely being accused of being Khawārij?
Which “Wahhābīs” are falsely being accused of making Takfīr of Muslims? Which “Wahhābīs” are falsely being accused of spilling the blood of Muslims? Which “Wahhābīs” appropriately do Takfīr of the apostate rulers?
Which “Wahhābīs” are the kuffār and apostates uniting together all over the world to fight against?
The exact same things that the Qubūriyyah (grave-worshippers) accused the Muwahhidīn with; today the Qusūriyyah (palace-worshippers) accuse the Muwahhidīn of the exact same things.
ﺎﻬﻨِﻣ ﻙﻮﺟِﺮﺨﻴِﻟ ِﺽﺭَﻷﺍ ﻦِﻣ ﻚﻧﻭﺰِﻔﺘﺴﻴﹶﻟ ﹾﺍﻭﺩﺎﹶﻛ ﻥِﺇﻭ
...
ﹰﻼﻳِﻮﺤﺗ ﺎﻨِﺘﻨﺴِﻟ ﺪِﺠﺗ ﹶﻻﻭ
“And verily they were about to frighten you (O Muhammad ﻢﻠﺳو ﻪﻴﻠﻋ ﷲا ﻰﻠﺻ) so much as to drive you out from it (the land)… And you will not find any alteration in Our Sunnah (rule or way).” 698
Just like the Ottomans propagated that the Imāms of the Da’wah of Najd were rebelling against Muslim rulers- today the apostate rulers claim that the Muwahhidūn are rebelling against Muslim rulers.
And just like the scholars of the Ottoman grave-worshippers issued verdicts saying that it is obligatory to kill and fight the Muslims whom they labeled as Khawārij- today’s palace- worshippers claim that is obligatory to kill the Muwahhidīn since they are also Khawārij.
Just like the Muwahhidūn opposed making Takfīr of Muslims, and only made Takfīr of apostates, but yet were labeled as Khawārij- today the Muwahhidūn are labeled as Khawārij, even though they prohibit calling Muslims kuffār, and only make Takfīr of apostates.
Just like the Da’wah of Najd prohibited revolting against a Muslim ruler, even if they are oppressors, but yet the apostates falsely propagated that they were rebelling against the Muslim rulers- today the Muwahhidūn prohibit revolting against the Muslim rulers, but still the apostate regimes claim that they are revolting against Muslim regimes.
Just like the Qubūriyyah (grave-worshippers) Ottoman scholars labeled the Muwahhidīn as “Wahhābiyīn”- the Qusūriyyah (palace-worshippers) scholars of Irjā’ and Tajahhum label the Muwahhidīn as “Irhābiyyīn” (terrorists).
698 Al-Isrā’: 75-77
Just like the apostates and kuffār propagated that a British spy “inspired and taught” Shaykh Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhāb ﷲا ﻪﻤﺣر - today the Murji’ah propagate that the Shuyūkh of Tawhīd are being stirred and instigated by hidden Zionists who have infiltrated. 699 They think
that such fabricated childish propaganda will make Muslims abandon their courageous and forbearing ‘Ulamā’ who speak the truth in the face of these murtadd Tawāghīt.
Just as the Pashas begged the English and French Empires to help them against the Muwahhidīn- today the apostate rulers beg the Americans and British to provide them with assistance against the Muwahhidīn.
Just as the British Queen summoned Pasha to her after he destroyed the capital of the Muslims, to congratulate him- today the Zionists and Crusaders speak well of their slaves whenever they “clamp down on Wahhābism”, and if the Crusaders are in a good mood, the apostates get to visit their white palaces.
Just like the Ottoman scholars preferred to take the British and French as their Awliyā’, rather than the “Wahhābiyyīn”- today the Followers of Irjā’ and Tajahhum prefer to take the Crusaders as their Awliyā’, rather than the “Irhābiyyīn”.
Just like… and just like… and just like…
Just like the Muslims were upon Haqq in their Jihād against the grave-worshipping Ottoman Empire- today the Salafiyyah are upon Haqq in their Jihād against the apostate regimes. And if you are able to realize that the shirk 700 of the Ottomans was in worshipping the
graves of righteous people like Abū Ayyūb Al-Ansārī ﻪﻨﻋ ﷲا ﻲﺿر, Abū Hanīfah, and ‘Abdul- Qādir Al-Jīlānī; and then you see today’s apostate regimes worshipping their gods (Ālihah) Bush, Blair, Putin, and Sharon- the same swine and apes which declared a Zionist Crusade against Islām and Millat Ibrāhīm, and dared to say that they would “smoke” the Muwahhidīn “out of their holes”; if you are able to grasp this- then you would also be able to understand that these apostate regimes of today are more worthy of Takfīr and more deserving of being fought than the Ottoman grave-worshippers. Wallāhu Al-Musta’ān.
There are some Verses which can be used to describe the condition of these People of Irjā’ and Tajahhum.
ﺎﺑِﺬﹶﻛ ﺎﱠﻟِﺇ ﹶﻥﻮﹸﻟﻮﹸﻘﻳ ﻥِﺇ ﻢِﻬِﻫﺍﻮﹾﻓﹶﺃ ﻦِﻣ ﺝﺮﺨﺗ ﹰﺔﻤِﻠﹶﻛ ﺕﺮﺒﹶﻛ
“Mighty is the word that comes out of their mouths. They utter nothing but a lie.” 701
And we say to the People of Irjā’ and Tajahhum, as is in the Verse,
699 Their psychological warfare uses this type of “reverse psychology” method. Muslims should
beware of their deceit.
700 The shirk of the Ottomans also included shirk in Tahākum to the Tawāghīt, by replacing the Sharī’ah.
Refer to the poem of Imām ‘Abdul-Latīf Ibn ‘Abdir-Rahmān ﻪﻤﺣرﷲا .
ﺎﺟﻮِﻋ ﺎﻬﻧﻮﻐﺒﺗﻭ ِﻪِﺑ ﻦﻣﺁ ﻦﻣ ِﻪﹼﻠﻟﺍ ِﻞﻴِﺒﺳ ﻦﻋ ﹶﻥﻭﺪﺼﺗﻭ ﹶﻥﻭﺪِﻋﻮﺗ ٍﻁﺍﺮِﺻ ﱢﻞﹸﻜِﺑ ﹾﺍﻭﺪﻌﹾﻘﺗ ﹶﻻﻭ
“And sit not on every road, threatening, and hindering from the Path of Allāh those who have Īmān in Him, and seeking to make it crooked.” 702
And this is what all the followers of the Messengers face, as Allāh has clarified,
ِﺠﹾﻟﺍﻭ ِﺲﻧِﻹﺍ ﲔِﻃﺎﻴﺷ ﺍﻭﺪﻋ ﻲِﺒِﻧ ﱢﻞﹸﻜِﻟ ﺎﻨﹾﻠﻌﺟ ﻚِﻟﹶﺬﹶﻛﻭ
ﺍﺭﻭﺮﹸﻏ ِﻝﻮﹶﻘﹾﻟﺍ ﻑﺮﺧﺯ ٍﺾﻌﺑ ﻰﹶﻟِﺇ ﻢﻬﻀﻌﺑ ﻲِﺣﻮﻳ ﻦ
ﹶﻥﻭﺮﺘﹾﻔﻳ ﺎﻣﻭ ﻢﻫﺭﹶﺬﹶﻓ ﻩﻮﹸﻠﻌﹶﻓ ﺎﻣ ﻚﺑﺭ ﺀﺎﺷ ﻮﹶﻟﻭ
“So We have appointed for every Prophet enemies- Shayātīn among humans and the Jinn, inspiring one another with adorned speech as a delusion. If your Lord had so willed, they would not have done it- so leave them and their fabrications.” 703But Allāh promises,
ﺮِﻓﺎﹶﻜﹾﻟﺍ ﻩِﺮﹶﻛ ﻮﹶﻟﻭ ﻩﺭﻮﻧ ﻢِﺘﻳ ﻥﹶﺃ ﱠﻻِﺇ ﻪﹼﻠﻟﺍ ﻰﺑﹾﺄﻳﻭ ﻢِﻬِﻫﺍﻮﹾﻓﹶﺄِﺑ ِﻪﹼﻠﻟﺍ ﺭﻮﻧ ﹾﺍﻭﺆِﻔﹾﻄﻳ ﻥﹶﺃ ﹶﻥﻭﺪﻳِﺮﻳ
ﹶﻥﻭ
“They want to extinguish the Light of Allāh with their mouths- But Allāh refuses except that His Light should be perfected, even though the kāfirūn hate it.” 704
702 Al-A’rāf: 86
703 Al-An’ām: 112 704 At-Tawbah: 32