2.2 Marco conceptual
2.2.3 Labor técnica de los bibliotecarios
Yes No Undecided
153 REFERENCES
Artiles, A. J., Bal, A., & Thorius, K.A.K. (2010). Back to the future: A critique of response to intervention’s social justice views. Theory Into Practice, 49, 250-257.
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139-1160.
Batsche, G., Elliot, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J. Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., et al. (2006). Response to Intervention: Policy Considerations and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.
Beattie v. Board of Education (no number in original), 169 Wis. 231; 172 N.W. 153 (1919). Bernhardt, V. L., & Hebert, C. L. (2011). Response to intervention (RtI) and continuous
school improvement (CSI): Using data, vision, and leadership to design, implement, and evaluate a schoolwide prevention system. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2010). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Brown, E. F., & Abernethy, S. H. (2009). Policy implications at the state and district level with rti for gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 32(3), 52-57.
Brown, J. E., & Doolittle, J. (2008). A cultural, linguistic, and ecological framework for response to intervention with English language learners. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40(5), 66-72.
Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
Buffum, A., Mattos, M., Weber, C. (2010). The why behind RTI. Educational Leadership, 10, 10-16.
Burns, M. K., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2006). Comparison of existing response-to-intervention models to identify and answer implementation questions. Communique, 34(5). Retrieved from: http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/mocq345rti_burns.aspx Byrd, E. S. (2011). Educating and involving parents in the response to intervention process:
154
Castillo, J. M., & Batsche, G. M. (2012). Scaling up response to intervention: The influence of policy and research and the role of program evaluation. Communique, 40(8), 14- 16.
Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F., 119 S Ct. 992(1999).
Cheung, D., Hattie, J., & Ng, D. (2001). Reexamining the States of Concern Questionnaire: A test of alternative models. Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 225-236. Cranston, N., Mulford, B., Keating, J., & Reid, A. (2009). Researching the public purposes
of education in Australia: The results of a national survey of primary school
principals (Report CRA09995). Canberra, Australia: Australia Government Primary Principals’ Association. Retrieved from http://aare.edu.au/09pap/cra09995.pdf Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc. Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District v. Michael F., 118 F.3d 245 (5th Cir. 1997). Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Barnett, D., Witt, J. C., & Olson, S. C. (2007). Varying
intervention delivery in response to intervention: Confronting and resolving
challenges with measurement, instruction, and intensity. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 562-581.
Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education, 874 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.1989).
Deno, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Lembke, E. S., Magnusson, D., Callender, S. A., Windram, H., & Stachel, N. (2009). Developing a school-wide progress monitoring system. Psychology in the Schools, 46(1), 44-55.
Department of Public Welfare v. Haas. 154 N.E. 2nd 265 (Ill. 1958).
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Drame, E. R., & Xu, Y. (2008). Examining sociocultural factors in response to intervention
models. Childhood Education, 85(1), 26-32.
Dray, B. J., & Wisneski, D. B. (2011). Mindful reflection as a process for developing culturally responsive practices. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 44(1), 28-36. Duerr, L., & Meyers, S. (2008). Response to intervention: Information session for
elementary principals. Retrieved from the Delaware Department of Education website: www.doe.k12.de.us/infosuites/staff/profdev/rti_files/RTIpresentation.ppt
155
Ehren, B. J., Deshler, D. D., & Graner, P. S. (2010). Using the content literacy continuum as a framework for implementing RTI in secondary schools. Theory into Practice, 49(4), 315-322.
English, F. W. (2008). The art of educational leadership: Balancing performance and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Faggella-Luby, M., & Wardwell, M. (2011). RTI in a middle school: Findings and practical implications of a tier 2 reading comprehension study. Learning Disabilities
Quarterly, 34(1), 35-49.
Feifer, S. G. (2008). Integrating response to intervention within neuropsychology: A scientific approach to reading. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 812-825. Fernando, S. (2010). Implementing response to intervention: Use of innovation
configuration maps within a multiple-case study analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3413208) Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation
components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531-540.
Fixsen, D. L., Sims, B., Blasé, K., Bartley, Duda, M. A., Metz, A.,…Van Dyke, M. K. (2011). Implementation, education, and RtI. Retrieved from University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute website:
http://nirn.fpg.unc/
Florida Department of Education (2008). Statewide response to instruction/intervention (RtI) implementation plan. Retrieved from
http://www.floridarti.usf.edu/resources/format/pdf/RTI.pdf
Friedman, E. K. (2010). Secondary prevention in an RTI model: A step toward academic recovery. The Reading Teacher, 64(3), 207-210.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 263-279.
Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement: A best practice guide. [Handout]. National Association of School Psychologists.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Speece, D. L. (2003). Treatment validity as a unifying construct for identifying learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 25(1), 33-45. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Stecker, P. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a
new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 301-323.
156
Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226.
Feinberg, W. & Soltis, J. F. (2004). School and society (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gabrieli, C. (2010). More time, more learning. Educational Leadership, April, 38-44. Garcia, S. B., & Ortiz, A. A. (2006). Preventing disproportionate representation: Culturally
and linguistically responsive prereferral interventions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 64-68.
George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: The Stages of Concern Questionnaire. Austin, TX: SEDL.
Glover, T. A. & DiPerna, J. C. (2007). Service delivery for response to intervention: Core components and directions for future research. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 526-540.
Graden, J. L., Stollar, S. A., & Poth, R. L. (2007). The Ohio integrated systems model: Overview and lessons learned. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M.
VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention (pp. 288-299). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Gresham, F. M. (2007). Evolution of the response-to-intervention concept: Empirical foundations and recent developments. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention (pp. 10-24). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Hale, J., Alfonso, V., Berninger, V., Bracken, B., Christo, C., Clark, E.,…Yalof, J. (2010). Critical issues in response-to-intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities indentification and intervention: An expert white paper consensus. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 223-236.
Hall, S. L. (2008). A Principal’s Guide to Implementing Response to intervention. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2011). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Harlacker, J. E., & Siler, C. E. (2011). Factors related to successful RTI implementation. Communique, 39(6), 20-22.
157
Hazelkorn, M., Bucholz, J. L., Goodman, J. I., Duffy, M. L., & Brady, M. P. (2011). Response to intervention: General or special education? Who is responsible? The Educational Forum, 75, 17-25. doi: 10.1080/00131725.2010.528552
Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305 (1988).
Hoover, J. J., Baca, L., Wexler-Love, E., & Saenz, L. (2008). National implementation of response to intervention (RTI): Research Summary. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Special Education Leadership and Quality Teacher Initiative, BUENO Center-School of Education.
Hoover, J. J., & Love, E. (2011). Supporting school-based response to intervention: A practitioner’s model. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(3), 40-48.
Hopkins, K. D., Stanley, J. C., & Hopkins, B. R. (1990). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (7th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Howell, D. C. (2011). Fundamental statistics for the behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Belmont,
CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Ikeda, M. J., Rahn-Blakeslee, A., Niebling, B. C., Gustafson, J. K., Allison, R., & Stumme, J. (2007). The Heartland Area Education Agency 11problem-solving approach: An overview and lessons learned. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M.
VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention (pp. 255-268). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments, 20 U.S.C., 1400 et seq. (1997). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). Public Law 108-446 (20
U.S.C 1400 et seq.).
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, 468 U.S. 883 (1984).
Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2007). Response to intervention at school: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention (pp. 3-9). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Kaplan, J. P. (2011). Massachusetts school psychologists’ concerns regarding the
implementation of responsiveness-to-intervention: A concerns-based adoption model approach (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3434770)
158
King, D. D. (2011). Teacher understanding and perception of a response to intervention program in a rural, western North Carolina school district (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3457616) Klotz, M. B. & Nealis, L. (2005). The new IDEA: A summary of significant reforms.
National Association of School Psychologist [Policy Update]. Bethesda, MD: NASP. Kovaleski, J. F. (2007). Potential pitfalls of response to intervention. In S. R. Jimerson, M.
K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention (pp. 80-89). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Kratochwill, T. R, Volpiansky, P., Clements, M., & Ball, C. (2007). Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models:
Implications for response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 618-631. Kurns, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Response to intervention: Blueprint of implementation -
School building level. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.
Landon, D. J. (2010). Impact of teacher concerns on response to intervention
implementation (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3488800)
Lembke, E. S., McMaster, K. L., & Stecker, P. M. (2010). The prevention science of reading research within a response-to-intervention model. Psychology in the Schools, 47(1), 22-35.
Lerner, J. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (8th ed). Boston, MA: Houghton Mufflin Company.
Lichtenstein, R. (2008). Best practices in identification of learning disabilities. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology V, Vol. 2 (pp. 295- 317). Bethesda, MD: The National Association of School Psychologists.
Lieberman, J. M. (2002). Three streams and four policy entrepreneurs converge: A policy window opens. Education and Urban Society, 34, 438-450.
Lin, W., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Web and mail surveys: An experimental comparison of methods for nonprofit research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1014-1028.
Little, M. E. (2012). Action research and response to intervention: Bridging the discourse divide. The Educational Forum, 76, 69-80.
159
Lumby, J. & English, F. W. (2010). Leadership as lunacy: And other metaphors for educational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Machek, G. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of practicing school psychologists. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(2), 147-157.
Marshall, C., & Gerstl-Pepin, C. (2005). Re-framing educational politics for social justice. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Marston, D., Lau, M., & Muyskens, P. (2007). Implementation of the problem-solving model in the Minneapolis Public Schools. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention (pp. 279-287). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 525-531.
McKenzie, R. G. (2009). Obscuring vital distinctions: The oversimplification of learning disabilities within RtI. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 32, 203-215.
McLeskey, J., Tyler, N. C., & Flippin, S. S. (2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers. Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 5-21.
McMaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2003). Evaluating value-added models for teacher accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND
Corporation.
Mellard, D. F., McKnight, M., & Woods, K. (2009). Response to intervention screening and progress-monitoring practices in 41 local schools. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(4), 186-195.
Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972). Morning, K. V. (2012). Implementation of response to intervention in urban elementary
schools (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3523199)
National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems (2005). Cultural
considerations and challenges in response-to-intervention models. Retrieved January 5, 2012, from http://www.rti4success.org/pdf/rti.pdf
160
National Center on Response to Intervention (2010). RtI state database: The states chart. Retrieved from rti4success website: http://state.rti4success.org/index.php
Newell, M., & Kratochwill, T.R. (2007). The integration of response to intervention and critical race theory-disability studies: A robust approach to reducing racial discrimination in evaluation decisions. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention (pp. 65-79). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
No Child Left Behind, 20 U.S.C. 16301 et seq. (2001).
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2010). Policies governing services for children with disabilities. Raleigh, NC: Author.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2011). Responsivesness to instruction (RtI). Retrieved December 15, 2011, from
http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/curriculum/ responsiveness/rtimaterials/overview.pdf
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2012). Educational directory & demographical information exchange (eddie). Retrieved from
http://www.dpi.state.nc.us/fbs/accounting/eddie
Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301-314.
Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District, 995 F.2d 1204 (3rd Cir. 1993)
Ortiz, S. O., Flanagan, D. P., & Dynda, A. M. (2008). Best practices in working with culturally diverse children and families. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology V, Vol. 5 (pp. 1721-1738). Bethesda, MD: The National Association of School Psychologists.
Osborne, A. G., & Russo, C. J. (2003). Special education and the law: A guide for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Pascopella, A. (2010). RTI goes mainstream. District Administration, 46(4), 45-49. Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F.
Supp. 1257 (E.D. Pa. 1971), 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa.1972)
Peterson, D. W., Prasse, D. P., Shinn, M. R., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2007). The Illinois flexible service delivery model: A problem-solving model initiative. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The
161
Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention (pp. 300-318). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Powell-Smith, K. A. & Ball, P. L., (2008). Best practices in reintegration and special education exit decisions. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology V, Vol. 2 (pp. 263-280). Bethesda, MD: The National Association of School Psychologists.
Public Law 94-142 (1975). The Education of All Handicapped Children Act.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
Reiser, D., & Skalski, A. K. (2010). Education reforms begin to take shape: The U.S. Department of Education’s blueprint for the reform of NCLB/ESEA. Communique, 38(7), 6-7.
Reschly, D. J. (2008). School psychology paradigm shift and beyond. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology V, Vol. 1 (pp. 3-16). Bethesda, MD: The National Association of School Psychologists.
Reschly, D. J., Hosp, J. L., & Schmied, C. M. (2003). And miles to go…:State SLD requirements and authoritative recommendations. [Research Grant Report
H324U010004]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs; National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.
Reynold, C. R., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2009). Response to intervention: Ready or not? Or, from wait-to-fail to watch-them-fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 130-145. Roach, A. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Frank, J. L. (2009). School-based consultants as change
facilitators: Adaptation of the concerns-based adoption model (CBAM) to support the implementation of research-based practices. Journal of Educational and
Psychological Consultation, 19, 300-320. doi: 10.1080/10474410802463304 Rogers, M. R., & O’Bryon, E. C. (2008). Advocating for social justice: The context for
change in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 37(4), 493-498. Roncker v. Walter, 700 F.2d 1058 (6th Cir.1983).
S-1 v. Turlington, 635, F.2d 342 (5th Cir. 1981).
Sacramento City Unified School District Board of Education v. Rachel H., 14 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1207 (1994).
Salato, R. M. (2012). Response to instruction and intervention : Teachers’ perception of the implementation in the Beaumont Unified School District as measured by the
162
Concerns Based Adoption Model (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3503826)
Samuels, C. A. (2008). Spec. ed. Is funding early help. Education Week, 28(3), 1-3.
Saunders, M. N. K. (2012). Web versus mail: The influence of survey distribution mode on employees’ response. Field Methods, 24(1), 56-73.
Scheurich, J. J., & Skrla, L. (2003). Leadership for equity and excellence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Sciekra, B. J., & Silberglitt, B. (2007). School schedules: A unique challenge for RtI. Communique, 36(1). Retrieved from: http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/ mocq361rti.aspx
Shih, T. H., & Fan, X. (2008). Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20(3), 249-271.
Shinn, M. R. (2008). Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School
Psychology V, Vol. 2 (pp. 243-262). Bethesda, MD: The National Association of School Psychologists.
Skalski, A. K. (2011). Promoting the critical role of learning supports in policy, practice, and school improvement. Communique, 39(5), 14.
Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and latino
disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85-107. Skrtic, T. M. (1991). Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture
and school organization. Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company. Smith, S. L., Peters, M., Sanders, M., & Witz, K. (2010). Applying a response to
intervention framework for noncategorical special education identification. Communique, 38(8), 9-11.
Stanovich, K. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350-361.
Steele, J. L., Hamilton, L. S., & Stecher, B. M. (2010). Incorporating student performance measures into teacher evaluation systems. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Tilly, W. D. (2008). The evolution of school psychology to science-based practice: Problem
163
in School Psychology V, Vol. 1 (pp. 17-36). Bethesda, MD: The National Association of School Psychologists.
Vague, K. C. (2011). A case study of one school’s journey in the implementation process of response to intervention: Challenge at the middle school level (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3490039)