• No se han encontrado resultados

La noción de competencia interactiva de Habermas como herramienta

II. La relevancia explicativa de la categoría identidad

2.5 La noción de competencia interactiva de Habermas como herramienta

Each Hi-Vol w as equipped w ith a sam pling m odule. This m odule held a circular 10 cm diam eter W hatman G F /A filter (pore size 1.5 pm) and two in line p o ly u reth an e (PUF) foam plugs (vapour trap). The m odule could be rem oved as a single unit to prevent handling contam ination. The filters w e re b ak ed at 450 ®C for 14 h p rio r to m odule co n stru ctio n and gravim etrically weighed after cooling. The PUF plugs were pre-extracted in

dichlorom ethane (DCM) for 16 h, loosely w rapped in alum inium foil, and air dried in a clean air cabinet. The dried PUF plugs were placed into a pre­ cleaned glass sleeve which fitted into the m odule behind the filter head. An a lu m in iu m plate was screw ed into place over the exposed filter, and alum inium foil was w rapped over the rear air vent to avoid contam ination w hen the m odules were being transported.

The 5 L jar of the deposition sam pler was rinsed w ith DCM and MilliQ® w ater prior to its transport to the field. 25 mL of 5% copper sulphate solution w as ad d ed to the jar as an algicide. Similarly, the inverted metal frisbee and anti-splash m esh were thoroughly rinsed in DCM. A plastic cover was taped over the frisbee when in transport to and from the field or w hen in storage.

3.3.2 First stage sam ple clean up

A ir samples. A schematic diagram showing the steps taken for atm ospheric sam ple clean u p is presented in Figure 3.3. Basically this involved solvent extraction followed by solid phase extraction using open column adsorption chrom atography to remove interfering contaminants from the analyte.

The sam pling m odule was dism antled in the clean air cabinet and the PUFs w ere w rap p ed separately in alum inium foil. The filter was placed into a desiccator for 24 h and then re-weighed to obtain the mass of the collected particulate or total suspended particulate (TSP). TSP concentrations (pg n r 3)

Figue 3.3. Flow chart showing the various stages in sample clean up and analysis of air samples.

Filter sample

Solvent exchange to 10 mL of dichlorom ethane (PCM)

Elute through 1 g of Florisil™ and reduce volume to 1 mL Filter and PUFs separately extracted

in n-hexane for 16 hr

PAH analysis

HPLC - Fluorescence detector

Elute through 1 g Florisil™

Solvent exchange to 1 mL of dodecane Facilitate solvent exchange

to 10 mL of n-hexane 1st stage clean up 2nd stage clean up PCB analysis HRGC-ECD

are presented for the Manchester, Cardiff and Hazelrigg sites in A ppendix 1. The filter w as w rapped in alum inium foil and placed into a plastic bag, along w ith the PUF plugs and stored at 4 °C prior to analysis. Samples were stored for no longer than 1 m onth before analysis. Kloster et al. (1992) found sam ple integrity to be preserved for PAHs after 4 m onths of storage at room tem p eratu re. The PUF plugs and the glassfibre filters w ere extracted se p a ra te ly in a 6-place Biichi soxhlet u sing p esticid e-g rad e hexane (R athburns Ltd.). The extraction was run for 16 h, before being taken dow n to n e ar d ry n ess and rem oved from the soxhlet. Extracts w ere then quantitatively transferred to 10 mL glass vials, using several DCM washings (to facilitate solvent exchange). The volume was then gently reduced to 1 mL on a heating block (at 35 °C) under nitrogen. The 1 mL extract w as then passed through 1 g of Florisil™ (60-100 mesh) packed into a glass pasteur pipette and eluted with 9 mL of DCM. This volume was then reduced again to 1 mL, passed through a 0.5 pm syringe filter and transferred to H ew lett Packard (HP) 2 mL chromatography vials for analysis of PAHs.

Deposition samples. A schematic diagram showing deposition sam ple d e a n u p is presented in Figure 3.4. T he first step involved filtering th e w ater th ro u g h a 18.5 cm W hatm an p ap er filter to rem ove large p articu late m aterial. This filter w as carefully air d rie d in a d e a n a ir c ab in e t a n d so x h let

extracted along w ith a q u a rte r PU F p lu g u s e d to w ip e th e in te rio r o f th e

m etal frisbee. PAHs and PCBs w e re e x tracted w ih p e stic id e -g ra d e n-hexane

Figure 3.4 Flow chart showing the various stages in clean up and analysis of deposition samples.

Sample reduced to 1 mL and filtered

Disk w ashed with two 10 mL aliquots of DCM___________

Solvent exchange to 10 mL of DCM

Deposition filtered through 18.5 cm W hatman filter paper

Filtered w ater passed through conditioned C-18 extraction disk

Filter dried and extracted

with quarter PUF (frisbee wipe) for 16 h in n-hexane

DCM aliquots bulked and reduced to ~ 1 mL. Elute through 1 g Florisil

with a further 9 mLs DCM

PAH analysis

Elute through 1 g Florisil

Solvent exchange to 1 mL of dodecane Facilitate solvent exchange

to lOmL n-hexane

exchange to DCM after soxhlet extraction. The filtered water was conditioned w ith 5 mL of m eth an o l/L of water. This was then filtered through a pre­ treated C-18 Empore disk which retained organic compounds from the w ater sample. The C-18 disk was subsequently washed with two 10 mL aliquots of DCM; these were added to the DCM from the filter paper and PUF extract an d ev ap o rated u n d er a gentle stream of nitrogen. Clean u p by colum n chrom atography followed the same procedure as the air samples. In the case of dep o sitio n sam ples each Florisil™ colum n h ad ~0.2 g of anhy d ro u s sodium sulphate added to the column to remove any w ater left w ithin the sam ple.

3.3.3 Second stage sam ple clean up

A ir and deposition samples. After PAH analysis the 1 mL of DCM extract w as then gently evaporated under nitrogen and solvent exchanged back into 1 mL of hexane. This was eluted through 1 g of Florisil™ w ith a further 9 mL of hexane. This volume was gently evaporated under a nitrogen stream to approxim ately 5 mL. 1 mL of dodecane (Aldrich Inc.) was added and the volum e further reduced until 1 mL of dodecane was left (evaporative losses of dodecane were considered to be negligible relative to hexane). The final extract volume of dodecane, was transferred to a 2 mL HP vial for analysis of PCBs.