• No se han encontrado resultados

POSIBLES DIFICULTADES Y EXIGENCIAS PARA LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE

1. REFERENTES TEÓRICOS

3.3. REFLEXIONES EN TORNO AL PIC REALIZADO EN UNA INSTITUCIÓN

3.3.2. POSIBLES DIFICULTADES Y EXIGENCIAS PARA LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE

4

� P r-l +> ..c: til .... <lJ s:: <lJ () <lJ

3

Q) r-l tl:. � til III <lJ � 0

2

45

50

55

F l e e c e We i ght - Bo dy We i ght

Re l a t lc neh 1 pB f'o r Lamb e

c!

+ +

6 0

6 5

70

Body We ight

( lb )

S i n g l e l amb s

75

l ambs

X Me a ns f'o r �- type regre s s i o n s

flI + +

No t e : The me a ns o f' s exes a re s hown fo r tw i n l a mb s o nly

Source

To tal

T ab le 4 8

Ana lys i s of Cova r i ance of Ho gge t Fleece

Weights Co rrected fo r Body We i ght

d. f. Res idua l Mean S quar e F

p

Wi thin groups D iffe rence 65 64 1 1 29 . 61 6 1 2 3. 71 8 5 . 89 8 1 . 9 0 3 5 . 89 8 3. 1 0 < 0 . 1 Regres s io n co effi c i en t wi thi n gro ups 0. 094 + 0 . 0048 All meas ureme nts are in po und s .

Tab l e 49

Hogge t Fleece We ights Clas s ified by Geno type

Geno type NN N+

Fleece we ight -- - -- ---- -

9 . 44

Fleece we ight at the same body we i ght

9 . 87

AIr measurements are in po unds .

The means ro r male a nd remale lambs have been plo tted ro r the d iffere n t geno types in the twin groups and the se show

tha t there was a consi s tent tenden cy fo r ewe lambs to have a higher fleec e we i ght ro r the i r body we ight . Thi s i s sho wn by the po s i tion of the me ans rel a t i ve to the appro pr i a te

regres s i o n line ; the means fo r females are above and tho s e fo r mal es b elow the regres s ion l ine i n e a c h c ase. The reaso n for thi s i s obs cure at thi s s ta ge.

2. Ewe ho gge ts.

Only a rew o rdinary hogge ts could be kept to 1 5 mon ths of age and i t was cons idered tha t the n umbers of e ach b i rth

rank group were insuff i c i ent to est ima te regression coeff i c i ents wi thin these groups. S i ngl e s and twins have therefo re been taken to ge ther fo r thi s ana lys i s .

The observed and co rre c ted means o f the fleece we ight are sho wn in Table 49 , where the correc tio n i s fo r body we ight.

I t can be s een that the d ifferenc es are b e tween N- type and

N+)

and the o rdinary hogge ts . The value of the regre s s i o n

coefr i c i ent wi thin the se two groups w a s used t o ob tain the

correc ted values . There i s a d ifference of about 0. 7 lb

(

Tab le 48 ) in favour o f the �- type she ep at cons tant bo dy we i ght. I t

i s po s s ib le tha t di fferen ce s i n the yield of c lean woo l could a c co un t fo r a par t of thi s , but the yi eld of a coarse woo l 1 s

likely to b e greater than a finer one in whi ch case the c lean fleece we ight dirferenc e s would be grea ter.

Fra ser

(

1 95� b

)

reports no differen ce in fle ece w e i ght

between �- type and ordinary sheep, thi s be ing reQui red fo r his

theory o f compe ti tion b e tween fo ll i cles ; however , no corre c t­

ions were made for body we i ght and de tails of the plan of experime n t are no t g i ven. From the regre s s ions and means

86

shown in F ig ure 7 i t can be s een how cons ider ation of fleece we i ght alone could lead to the conclus ion tha t no di fferences exi s ted ; s in ce the difference in bo dy weight compensates fo r the difference i n fle ece we i ght . I t could be argued tha t thes e differences d i s appear when the an imals are o lder , b ut by thi s time the e wes will have been ma ted and lamb i ng performance would have to be taken into account. Becaus e of the effects of lambing o n wo o l growth , the cons idera tion o f fleece w e ights prior to the firs t ma ting i s a b e tter guide to fundamental re lationshi ps b e tween fleece type and fleece we ighte.

Figure 7 a lso shows the means o f the different geno types

and b i r th ranks and i t can be s een that the twin lambs sti ll tend to show large r geno typi c differences than the s ingle lamb s . The N + twin lamb s which were reared as s ingles ( 4 ani mals)

appear to be complete ly anomalous as they had a far hi gher co rrec ted fleece weaght va lue than any of the o ther groups.

As all the a n imals were ewe s , s ex d ifference s canno t .e inve s ti ga ted but o therw i s e the resul ts are s imi lar to tho se ob tained for the fleece wei ghts o f the lambs only wi th smaller d i fferences rel a tive to the greater average fleece wei ghts. Summary of Section V, A.

( 1 ) The �- type she ep showed a greater greasy fle e ce wei ght a t cons tan t bo dy w� ight than the o rdinary she ep.

( 2 )

There was a greater diff erenc e b e tween the twi n than be twe en the s in gle lamb s and po ssible reasons fo r thi s are

d i s cu s s ed.

( 3 ) I t is cons idered tha t real diffe renc e s in clean woo l wei ght

were like ly to have o c curred.

( 4 ) I t i s po s s ible tha t ewe lamb s had a greater f leece wei ght

1 3

� 1 2

I I

9

8

9 0

95

1 0 0

F l e e c e Wei ght - Body We i gh t Re l a t i o ns h i ps fo r the Ewe Ho gge ts

XN+TS

Documento similar