• No se han encontrado resultados

El reconocimiento de los derechos de la mujer en las Naciones Unidas

Guia informativa sobre el sexismo y la violencia

5.3. El reconocimiento de los derechos de la mujer en las Naciones Unidas

The following two observations for the generic HARA utilities closely matches Jose et al. [2008]’s results for LRT utilities;

§A.2 HARA and the power and pseudo-spherical scores and divergences 90

happens to be affinely related to weighted Pseudo-spherical Score.

u(W−N+xk) =u I(λqpk k) = β−11 pka qkλ β−1 −1 = β−11 (b+βaW) β−1 β p k/qk (Σkqk(pk/qk)β)1/β β−1 −1 , (by using λ a β = Σkqk(pk/qk)β b+βaW ) = β−11 (b+βaW) β−1 β [(β−1)SS β(p,q,k) +1]−1 = (b+βaW) β−1 β SS β(p,q,k) +u(W)

2)The constrained maximum expected utility (MEU) is affinely related to the pseudo- spherical divergence, which in turn is monotonically related to the power divergence (oral pha-divergence)

UW(p||q) =Σkpku(W−N+xk) = β−11 (b+βaw) β−1 β Σ kqk(pk/qk)β 1/β −1 = β−11 (b+βaW) β−1 β [(β−1)DS β(p,q) +1]−1 = (b+βaW) β−1 β DS β(p,q) +u(W)

Further we can show that the u∗λ-divergence is also affinely related to the pseudo- spherical divergence. u∗λ(p||q)=Σkpku∗(λqpk k)(Or=UW(p||q)−λW) =Σkpk " λqk apk 1−β β(β−1) + λqkb βapk − 1 β−1 # , (usingu∗(y) = (y/a)1−β β(β−1) + yb βaβ−11) =Σkpk " apk λqk β−1 β(β−1) # + λbβaβ−11 ... ... = ( (b+aW) b+βaW)1/β 1 (β−1) Σkqk(pk/qk)β 1/ββ−11, (by using λ a β = Σkqk(pk/qk)β b+βaW ) = ( (b+aW) b+βaW)1/β 1 (β−1)[(β−1)D S β(p,q) +1]− 1 β−1 = ( (b+aW) b+βaW)1/βD S β(p,q) + 1 β−1 h ( b+aW) (b+βaW)1/β −1 i

References

Abernethy, J.; Chen, Y.;andVaughan, J. W., 2011. An Optimization-Based Frame-

work for Automated Market-Making. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’11). (cited on pages 2, 12, 27, 28, 37, 38, 41, and 82)

Abernethy, J.; Chen, Y.; and Vaughan, J. W., 2013. Efficient Market Making via

Convex Optimization, and a Connection to Online Learning. 1, 2 (2013), 1–39. (cited on pages 12, 41, and 82)

Abernethy, J.andFrongillo, R., 2011. A Collaboratice Mechanism for Crowdsourc-

ing Prediction Problems. InNeural Information Processing Systems, 2011. (cited on page 9)

Abernethy, J.; Kutty, S.; Lahaie, S.; and Sami, R., 2014. Information aggregation

in exponential family markets. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC ’14, 395–412. ACM, New York, NY, USA. (cited on pages 18, 30, 31, 45, and 84)

Agrawal, S.; Delage, E.; Peters, M.; Wang, Z.; andYe, Y., 2011. A unified frame-

work for dynamic prediction market design. Operations Research, 59, 3 (2011), 550– 568. (cited on pages 26, 29, 53, 76, and 84)

Amari, S., 2007. Integration of stochastic models by minimizingα-divergence.Neural

Computing, 19, 10 (2007), 2780–2796. (cited on page 20)

Arrow, K. and Debreu, G., 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive

economy. Econometrica, 22 (1954). (cited on pages 11 and 36)

Arrow, K. J.; Forsythe, R.; Gorham, M.; Hahn, R.; Hanson, R.; Ledyard, J. O.;

Levmore, S.; Litan, R.; Milgrom, P.; Nelson, F. D.; Neumann, G. R.; Ottaviani,

M.; Schelling, T. C.; Shiller, R. J.; Smith, V. L.; Snowberg, E.; Sunstein, C. R.;

Tetlock, P. C.; Tetlock, P. E.; Varian, H. R.; Wolfers, J.;andZitzewitz, E., 2008.

The promise of prediction markets. Science, 320, 5878 (2008), 877–878. (cited on pages 7 and 9)

Beck, A. and Teboulle, M., 2003. Mirror descent and nonlinear projected subgra-

dient methods for convex optimization. Operations Research Letters, 31, 3 (2003), 167–175. (cited on pages 72 and 75)

REFERENCES 92

Bell, R. M. and Koren, Y., 2007. Lessons from the netflix prize challenge. ACM

SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 9, 2 (2007), 75–79. (cited on page 9)

Ben-Tal, A.; Charnes, A.; and Teboulle, M., 1989. Entropic Means. Journal of

Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 139, 2 (1989), 537–551. (cited on page 20)

Ben-Tal, A. andTeboulle, M., 2007. An old-new concept of convex risk measures:

the optimized certainty equivalent. Mathematical Finance, 17 (2007), 449–476. (cited on page 76)

Beygelzimer, A.; Langford, J.; and Pennock, D., 2012. Learning performance of

prediction markets with kelly bettors. (2012). (cited on pages 2, 10, 14, 17, 21, 31, 50, 77, and 85)

Boyd, S. P.andVandenberghe, L., 2004. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University

Press. (cited on pages 38 and 60)

Breiman, L., 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 1 (2001), 5–32. (cited on

page 2)

Brier, G. W., 1950. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability.Monthly

weather review, 78 (1950), 1–3. (cited on page 24)

Chen, Y.; Dimitrov, S.; Sami, R.; Reeves, D. M.; Pennock, D. M.; Hanson, R. D.;

Fortnow, L.; and Gonen, R., 2009. Gaming Prediction Markets: Equilibrium

Strategies with a Market Maker. Algorithmica, 58, 4 (2009), 930–969. (cited on pages 31, 50, 83, and 84)

Chen, Y.; Goel, S.; and Pennock, D. M., 2008. Pricing combinatorial markets for

tournaments. In Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’08, 305–314. ACM, New York, NY, USA. (cited on page 12)

Chen, Y. and Pennock, D., 2007. A Utility Framework for Bounded-Loss Market

Makers. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. (cited on pages ix, 2, 7, 14, 16, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, and 47)

Chen, Y.; Reeves, D. M.; Pennock, D. M.; Hanson, R. D.; Fortnow, L.;andGonen,

R., 2007. Bluffing and strategic reticence in prediction markets. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet and Network Economics (WINE ’07) (San Diego, CA, USA, 2007), 70–81. (cited on pages 31 and 50)

Chen, Y.andVaughan, J. W., 2010. A new understanding of prediction markets via

no-regret learning. InProceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’10). (cited on pages 2, 27, 28, 41, and 43)

REFERENCES 93

Chernoff, H., 1952. A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of hypothesis based

on the sum of observations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23 (1952), 493–507. (cited on page 89)

Cole, R. and Fleischer, L., 2007. Fast-converging tatonnement algorithms for the

market problem. Technical report, Dartmouth College, Computer Science. (cited on page 21)

Csiszàr, I., 1967. Information-type measures of difference of probability distributions

and indirect observations. Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica, 2 (1967), 299–318. (cited on page 87)

DARPA, 2009. DARPA Network Challenge. http://archive.darpa.mil/

networkchallenge/. Retrieved 2012-01-25. (cited on page 9)

Dimitrov, S. and Sami, R., 2008. Non-myopic strategies in prediction markets. In

Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (EC ’08). (cited on pages 31 and 50)

Duchi, J. C.; Shalev-shwartz, S.; Singer, Y.; and Tewari, A., 2010. Composite

objective mirror descent. In In Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory. (cited on page 38)

Fleischer, L.; Garg, R.; Kapoor, S.; Khandekar, R.; and Saberi, A., 2008. A

fast and simple algorithm for computing market equilibria. InWINE 2008, 19–31. (cited on page 21)

Föllmer, H.andSchied, A., 2002. Convex measures of risk and trading constraints.

Finance and Stochastics, 6, 4 (2002), 429–447. doi:10.1007/s007800200072. http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s007800200072. (cited on pages 41 and 76)

Föllmer, H. and Schied, A., 2004. Stochastic Finance: An Introduction in Discrete

Time. De Gruyter studies in mathematics. Gruyter, Walter de GmbH. ISBN 9783110183467. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=9q07nwEACAAJ. (cited on pages 17, 18, 41, 65, and 66)

Freund, Y.andSchapire, R. E., 1995. A decision-theoritic generalization of on-line

learning and an application to boosting. In Computational Learning Theory: Second European Conference, EuroCOLT ’95, 23–37. Springer-Verlag. (cited on page 2) Frongillo, R.; Della-Penna, N.; and Reid, M. D., 2012. Interpreting prediction

markets: A stochastic approach. InNeural Information Processing Systems. (cited on pages 3, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 39, 40, 43, 45, 55, and 64)

REFERENCES 94

Goll, T. and Rüschendorf, L., 2001. Minimax and Minimal Distance Martingale

Measures and Their Relationship to Portfolio Optimization. Finance and Stochastics, 5 (2001), 557–581. (cited on pages 14, 55, 57, 58, and 87)

Good, I. J., 1971. Comment on paper by Buehler. InFoundations of Statistical Inference

(Toronto, 1971), 337–339. Holt, Reinhart and Winston. (cited on page 88)

Hanson, R., 2003. Combinatorial Information Market Design. Information Systems

Frontiers, 5, 1 (2003). (cited on pages 7, 12, 22, 23, 24, and 25)

Hanson, R., 2007. Logarithmic Market Scoring Rules for Modular Combinatorial

Information Aggregation . Journal of Prediction Markets, 1, 1 (2007). (Appears in 2002 as a technical report). (cited on pages x, 2, 13, 17, 23, 24, 25, and 47)

Havrda, J.andCharvát, F., 1967. Quantification method of classification processes

: Concept of structuralα-entropy. Kybernetika, 3 (1967), 30–35. (cited on page 88)

Howe, J., 2006. The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired, 14, 6 (2006). (cited on page 7)

Hu, J.andStorkey, A., 2014. Multi-period trading prediction markets with connec-

tions to machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.0648, (2014). (cited on pages 16, 17, 28, 30, 31, 53, 55, 64, 69, 71, 74, and 84)

Jacobs, R. A.; Jordan, M. I.; Nowlan, S. J.; and Hinton, G. E., 1991. Adaptive

mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation, 3, 1 (1991), 79–87. (cited on page 2) Jose, V. R. R.; Nau, R. F.; and Winkler, R. L., 2008. Scoring rules, generalized

entropy, and utility maximization. Operations Research, 56, 5 (2008), 1146–1157. (cited on pages 14, 16, 24, 40, 53, 54, 57, 58, 60, 63, 66, 67, 86, 87, 88, and 89)

Kelly, J. L. J., 1956. A New Interpretation of Information Rate. Bell System Technical

Journal, 35 (July 1956), 917–926. (cited on page 2)

Lay, N.and Barbu, A., 2010. Supervised Aggregation of Classifiers using Artificial

Prediction Markets. In27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2010)

(Haifa, Israel, 2010), 591–598. (cited on pages 13, 18, 21, 36, and 40)

Lay, N.and Barbu, A., 2011. An Introduction to Artificial Prediction Markets for

Classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, (2011). (cited on pages 2, 11, 13, 18, 21, and 36)

Lay, N. and Barbu, A., 2012. The Artificial Regression Market. (2012). (cited on

REFERENCES 95

Li, X.andVaughan, J. W., 2013. An axiomatic characterization of adaptive-liquidity

market makers. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’13). (cited on page 41)

Manski, C. F., 2004. Interpreting the predictions of prediction markets. Working

Paper 10359, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w10359. http: //www.nber.org/papers/w10359. (cited on page 34)

Manski, C. F., 2006. Interpreting the predictions of prediction markets. Economics

Letters, 91, 3 (June 2006), 425–429. (cited on pages 17 and 19)

Milgrom, P.and Stokey, N. L., 1982. Information, trade and common knowledge.

Journal of Economic Theory, 26, 1 (1982), 17â ˘A¸S27. (cited on page 22)

Nemirovski, A.; Juditsky, A.; Lan, G.; and Shapiro, A., 2009. Robust stochastic

approximation approach to stochastic programming.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 19, 4 (2009), 1574–1609. (cited on page 38)

Ostrovsky, M., 2012. Information Aggregation in Dynamic Markets With Strategic

Traders. Econometrica, 80, 6 (2012), 2595–2647. (cited on page 84)

Othman, A.andSandholm, T., 2010. When do markets with simple agents fail? In

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Volume 1 - Volume 1, AAMAS ’10 (Toronto, Canada, 2010), 865–872. Inter- national Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1838206.1838322. (cited on pages 17 and 30)

Othman, A.; Sandholm, T.; Pennock, D. M.; and Reeves, D. M., 2010. A Practi-

cal Liquidity-Sensitive Automated Market Maker. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Electronic commerce (EC’10). (cited on pages 29 and 41)

Pennock, D., 2010. Oddhead Blog: Musings of a computer scien-

tist on predictions, odds, and markets: Why automated market mak- ers? http://blog.oddhead.com/2010/07/08/why-automated-market-makers/. Retrieved: 20-02-2012. (cited on pages ix, 22, and 23)

Pennock, D. M., 2004. A dynamic pari-mutuel market for hedging, wagering, and

information aggregation. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC ’04, 170–179. ACM, New York, NY, USA. (cited on page 29)

Premachandra, M., 2013. Interpreting demands as divergences. https://www.

nicta.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/38228/SMLtalk_Mindika.pdf. NICTA Machine Learning Seminar Series. (cited on page 5)

REFERENCES 96

Premachandra, M. and Reid, M. D., 2013. Aggregating Predictions via Sequen-

tial Mini-Trading. Journal of Machine Learning Research: Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 29: Asian Conference on Machine Learning 2013 (2013), 373–387.

http://jmlr.org/proceedings/papers/v29/Premachandra13.pdf. (cited on pages 5, 33, 44, and 55)

Premachandra, M.andReid, M. D., 2014. Relating sequential and equilibrium pre-

diction markets. https://www.nicta.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/40472/ 2014.04.03_-_Mindika_Premachandra_-_slides.pdf. NICTA Machine Learning Seminar Series. (cited on page 5)

Reid, M. D.; Frongillo, R. M.; Williamson, R. C.;andMehta, N. A., 2014. Gener-

alized mixability via entropic duality. CoRR, abs/1406.6130 (2014). (cited on page 41)

Schied, A., 2004. On the Neyman-Pearson problem for law-invariant risk measures

and robust utility functionals. The Annals of Applied Probability, 14, 3 (2004), 1398– 1423. (cited on page 71)

Sethi, R. and Vaughan, J. W., 2013. Belief aggregation with automated market

makers. Available at SSRN 2288670, (2013). (cited on pages 14, 30, and 55)

Shalev-Shwartz, S., 2012. Online learning and online convex optimization. Founda-

tions and Trends in Machine Learning, 4, 2 (2012), 107–194. (cited on pages 54, 72, and 85)

Storkey, A. J., 2011. Machine learning markets. InProceedings of Artificial Intelligence

and Statistics (AISTATS). (cited on pages 2, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 33, 34, 35, and 57) Storkey, A. J.; Millin, J. J.; and Geras, K. J., 2012. Isoelastic agents and wealth

updates in machine learning markets. In Proceedings 29th International Conference on Machine Learning. (cited on pages 2, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 32, 34, 35, 36, 50, 53, 63, 64, 77, and 85)

Surowiecki, J., 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few

and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. Double- day. ISBN 978-0385503860. (cited on pages 1 and 7)

Tseng, J. J.; Lin, C. H.; Lin, C. T.; Wang, S. C.;andLi, S. P., 2010. Statistical properties

of agent-based models in markets with continuous double auction mechanism.

Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389 (2010), 1699–1707. (cited on page 21)

REFERENCES 97

Varian, H. R., 2009. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. W.W. Norton &

Company, 8th edn. (cited on page 35)

Vazirani, V. V., 2007. Algorithmic Game Theory, chap. Combinatorial Algorithms for

Market Equilibria. Cambridge University Press. (cited on pages 21 and 35) Wolfers, J.andZitzewitz, E., 2004. Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspec-

tives, 18, 2 (2004), 107–126. (cited on pages 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12)

Wolfers, J.andZitzewitz, E., 2006. Interpreting Prediction Market Prices as Prob-

abilities. NBER Working Paper Series. (cited on pages 7, 10, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, and 34)

Yaari, M. E., 1987. The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk. Econometrica, 55, 1 (1987),