Capítulo VIII: Evaluación Económica y
8.5. Rentabilidad 1 VANE y TIRE
The theorising of globalisation and the internationalisation of HE is most usefully discussed within an interdisciplinary framework.
I will now discuss sociological interpretations of how globalisation functions based on the local-‐global relationship. Then, notions of space and place, as theorized (primarily) by Edwards and Usher (1998; 2000) will be explained. Next, a theory of indigenisation proposed by Appadurai will be introduced. Finally, I will refer to Beck’s new 'scape', called an 'Eduscape', which I will argue explains the flow of educational practices and activities associated with internationalisation.
3.2.1 Global and local
The contrasting terms 'local' and 'global’ are frequently proposed to explain globalisation. Many accounts show how the local is surpassed by the global or the global seen as the standardising force that immerses the local. In fact, the phenomenon is more complex. Globalisation has been attributed to singular causes. However, Giddens (1990, 64) views it as a "dialectical
a uniform direction, but consists in mutually opposed tendencies" (Giddens, 1990, 64). Robertson, on the other hand (1992), envisages these forces not so much as 'mutually opposed' but as opposing interaction between the
particular and the universal. This multifaceted interaction and synthesis of globalising and localising interplay is called "glocalisation" (for example, Appadurai, 1990; Scott, 1997; Spybey, 1996). Here, the boundaries of local and global as separate units have become imprecise, and one cannot exist without the other. As Edwards and Usher (2000) claim, each must be understood as an integral part of the other.
Some of the consequences that flow from the overlapping of the global and local include time-‐space distantiation (Giddens, 1990), time-‐space
compression (Robertson, 1990), the disembedding of social relations (Giddens, 1990), and disconnection and dislocation (Edwards & Usher, 2000). It can be argued that increased mobility strengthens the experience of disconnection and the disembeddedness from place and social context, which provides the backdrop for the mobility of international students. It is to a more detailed discussion of space and place in globalisation theory that I now move.
3.2.2 Space and Place
As previously clarified, globalisation is about the movement of people and ideas across borders; it is unavoidable that this movement will interrupt notions of place, home, space and time. By the same token, globalisation has been portrayed as ‘re-‐imagining geography' (Edwards & Usher, 2000, 14; Said, in Hall 1992, 301). As the restrictions of geography overlap with space and time, they influence the understanding of 'home'. Once 'home' was considered a close-‐knit community, within a geographically small area. With the increase of human movement, this is no longer the case. The
aforementioned notions not only provide a context for the alarming and dramatic increase of refugees displaced by conflict, natural disasters and climate change, or people who move to high density urban agglomerations in search for work opportunities and better lives, but also for students and staff
in search of international experience in academia.
As Beck (2008, 64) observes, Waters (1995, 3) uses the phenomenon of fragmentation of place to underpin globalisation as "a social process in which the constraints of geography on social and cultural arrangements recede, and in which people become increasingly aware that they are receding." By the same token, Appadurai (1990) claims that geography of residence no longer entirely defines identity.
To illustrate the coexistence of contradictory phenomena, a feature of globalisation, Edwards and Usher’s (2000, 15) work is predominantly concerned with globalisation as a 'conceptualisation of space' and its impact on both the physical and imagined. They claim that the local is not in contrast to globalisation, but instead, must be seen as an integral part of it.
Edwards and Usher (1998; 2000), tracing the appearance of metaphors of location and space, suggest a theory of pedagogy for contemporary times. They argue that positioning, and being positioned "entail forms of dislocation -‐ of misidentifying and being positioned as other, and where positioning is itself mobile, always on the move" (1998, 160, emphasis added). They refer to Brah’s (1996) view of globalisation as a "diaspora space", unbounded, not closed, and marking "an intersectionality of contemporary conditions of transmigrancy of people, capital, commodities and culture" (p. 160). They also subscribe to Laclau’s (1990, cited on p. 160) concept of (dis)location as a decentred condition where new and compound identities and situations emerge from a diversity of locations. The use of brackets in (dis)location underlines the coexistence location and dislocation. Drawing on Derrida (1981), they argue that while (dis)location is a decentring of privileged locating forces, a refusal to privilege a certain position or voice, that
decentring is never complete as "locating processes will always be present" (p. 161).
3.2.3 Appadurai’s Theory of Indigenisation
Anthropologist and cultural studies academic Appadurai (1990) offers a framework that explains the multifaceted landscape of globalisation. Appadurai focuses on the cultural aspect of globalisation, in particular, the movement of people, and media. He sees global cultural movements as consisting of compound, interrelating and disconnected forces that are not fixed. This theory contests the twofold centre-‐periphery vision of world systems, in which orders of western innovation infiltrate and engross peripheral cultures (Appadurai, 1990). Appadurai rejects homogenisation and one-‐dimensional descriptions of cultural flows hypothesising a process of indigenisation, which acclimatizes, and transforms, or, indigenizes, a global idea, activity or object when integrated into a local community. He proposes a framework of five "scapes”: ethnoscape (the distribution of mobile
individuals as tourists, refugees, migrants, etc.), technoscape (the distribution of technology); finanscape (the distribution of capital),
mediascape (the distribution of information through a variety of media), and ideoscape (the distribution of political ideas and values) (p. 296-‐ 297). Drifts occur among these "scapes" in "increasingly non-‐isomorphic paths" (p. 301); namely, through paths that are varied and usually unpredictable in their directions.
3.2.4 Beck’s ‘Eduscape’
Kumari Beck attempts to theorize the internationalisation of education, HE in this case, in terms of an additional scape, called an ‘Eduscape’ which can be conceptualized as “the flow of educational theories, ideas, programs, activities and research in and across national boundaries” (2008, 82). As "each [scape] is subject to its own constraints and incentives ... at the same time as each acts as a constraint and a parameter for movements in the others" (Appadurai, 1996, 35), it is impossible to understand one in isolation without taking into account the effects that other scapes have on each other. Therefore, the flow of an ‘Eduscape’ will be affected or interconnected with ethnoscape (the movement of people – recruitment of international
portrayed in the media), finanscape (the flow of money in personal lives, as well as nationally and internationally) and ideoscape (the business of 'ideas' about education).
This notion thus goes well beyond definitions, which risk limiting
internationalisation to a blend of intercultural and international influences on universities. If globalisation is considered as fluid, complex, and
contradictory—the internationalisation of HE is better understood in terms of an ‘Eduscape’ which ‘reflects a multi-‐flow, more nuanced, diverse
interaction with various elements of the cultural, social, political, and economic dimensions relating to internationalisation” (Becks, 2008, 83).
3.2.5 Summary
The examples of theories of globalisation discussed above present a multifaceted, and intertwined set of forces and processes, often
contradictory, involving local activities and interaction across distances, some overlapping with one another, some dialectical and contrary,
concurrently standardising as well as disintegrating. The tension between global and local as well as space and place is ever present. Globalisation theory, then, helps to situate issues relating to internationalisation and to contextualise the inspirations, motivations and social circumstances that influence it. As one of the aims of the internationalisation of HE is the enhancement and improvement of the learning experience itself, I will now turn to a discussion of how the curriculum and pedagogy for a global university might be conceptualised.