heigh t of 8 cm. The elution buffer pH -vras 5. 25. Tn e long column for acidic and neu tral am ino acids c ontained r e sin type UR 30 to a h eigh t of 58 cm . Buffer , pH 3 . 25 , ,.ras used a s eluant , b eing replac ed after 90 min by a s econd buffer at pH 4. 30 . T"n e fl ow· rate for all buffer s was 68 ml/hr , an d the flow rat e for
ninhydr i n wa s 34 ml/hr
.
Cal ibrati on cons tant s for the amino acids wer e ob taine d from cal ibration runs using a standard amino ac i d mixtur e (Pi erc e Ch em i c al Co . , Il l i no i s ,u. s.A. ) .
Peaks ob tained from th e che e s e sampl e s wer e identi fied from standard elution tim e s , and quanti tated by th e height-wi dth m ethod o f m easur em ent . Amino acids can b e e s t imated thi s way wi th an accuracy of + 3% for the maj or p eaks (l\'oor e&
Stein ,1963 ) .
Determination o f aci
d
in ch e e s e. Th elevel s o f acid pho sphata s e i n cheeses made id th singl e-s train star t er s iver e determined using th e assay pro c edur e described b efor e (po 70 ) . Th e campl e consi sted of a bl ended one-fifth dilution of che e s e sampl e , prepar ed as for plate counting, wi th th e addi tion o f m er thiolate to a final conc entration of
0 . 0 3%
to prevent bac terial growth. Sinc e no thing ;.ra s known about sui tabl e inac tiva ting tr eatm ents for th e phosphata ses o f th e starter s trains , i t wa s not possible to include a control ch eese sampl e in whi ch pho sphata s e ac tivi ty had b een inactivated. Henc e , a s a control for th e assay,
2 . 0
ml o f di still ed wat er was sub sti tuted for th e ch eese sampl e .Flavour a ss e s sments. A panel of 6 to 10 experienc
e
d judges assessed th e ch e e s e s for Cheddar flavour and such o ff-flavour s a s90
b i t t ern e s s , a s tr ingency , frui tine s s and sharpn e s s . The int ensi
t i e s of th e s e flavour s vrer e scored on a sca.l e of 1 to
5 ,
and th edesirabi l i ty
o f th e overall ch e e s e fl avour on a scal e o f 1 to 9 as described previously(
see Y•7 9 ) .
R:SSULTS
?'anufa.c and data. Th e manufac turing and
analytic al data for the che e s e s have b een included
(
Tabl esV and
VI )
sinc e it i s di ffi cul t to assess th e significance of bac t eri ological fi ndings unl e s s th ese data are kno:m.Th e sal t-in-moi s t� e values o f th o first s eri e s o f cheeses
(I)
varied from3. 5 5%
for ML 1 t o 4 .25%
for H?. T'nu s th e effectof 1\aCl
on tee
curvival o f th e s tar t er organ i sm sand
pro t eolysi si n th e che e s e migh t no t b e stri c tly compe.rabl e b e h·een the
different
che e s e s . A s econd s eri e s o f ch e e s e s(II)
was made , k e eping th e making of th e ch eeses a s constant as po ssible. Thesal t-in-mo istur e value s of
thi s
s er i e s of cheeses 'ftler e all similar(
Tab l eVI )
and cl
ose to th e average value of4. 5%
ob tained in c omm erc ial ch eese s .To compensat e
for the fac t th at the moisture conten t s of the
milk
and curddiffer from that o f th e ch eese after "pr e ssing " , the ac tual counts obtained a s per ml o f milk or p er gram of ch eese curd
have been expr es sed as per gram of curd having a mo i s ture
content equal to that of th e fini shed ch eese. Th e fac tor used
to adju st the counts -v:as obtained from determination of th e moi sture contents o f the milk , the curd at "draining " , and
Tabl e VI. Routine analyses o f cheosos a. t 1 4 day s . Cheesema.king seri es Starter strain 'Moi s tur e % Fa t % NaCl % pH
Sal t-in-moi stur e %
--- -· I I I I HP
li'TL1
us 3 zs 3 3 . 8 36 . 6 35.6 34 . 0 37 c 5 3 5 . 5 36 . 5 37.o
1 . 44 1 . 30 1 . 34 1 . 39 4 e 92 4. 9 2 4o 9 5 4. 94 4. 25 3. 5 5 3 . 7 5 4 . 08 II li II II AM1 .A.M2 HP 11L1 35 . 3 34 . 1 33. 9 34 . 3 3 5 . 5 36 . 0 36 . 5 37 . 8 1 .67
1 .55
1 .6 2
1 0 6 2 5. 0 1 4. 98 4. 96 4. 99 4. 7 3 4 . 554.78
4 . 7 2 \0 1\)imr:1 edi a t ely p1" ior to sal ti ng
(Tabl e V) ,
and tnc moi sture
con
te
nts
of th e fin i sh e d ch e e s e s
(Table ·vr ) .
Th e moi s ture c o ntents o f th e milku sed for a l l ch e e s e s
was87% (
i . e. s o l i d s content1 3%)
at th e time of inocul ati o!l. In thi s v<ay a true i ndi c a t ion of
th e ir.cr 0as e of star t r numb ers c an be obta.i:'led , :ra th er than an
increa s e
d.u e to
a c o n c e· .tration effec t a s rr:oi s ture i s progres s-iv ely lost from th e curd.
1·:i th al l s trair:s , th e Daxitmm popul a t i ons wer e attair
.
ed dm·ing cheesemaking(
Fig s 1 8 anci. 1 9)
. Iav1son & ?eagan ( 1 9 57 )s ir.:ilarly fou!;.cl tha t maxir::um popul ati ons of start er •.;er e a ttained
duri ng making. nOvievor 1 c o n si d erc..bl e di fferenc es 1.; er e found in th e popul a ti o n tr er�ds of t!1e star ter s <iurir;g the ch e e s emaking
pr o c e s s
(
Tabl eVII ) .
Tl1 e g:c eatest incr ea s e in c el l nw"TTb er so c curr ed du:- i r.s t�EJ fir st