• No se han encontrado resultados

7KHÀUVWSDUWRIWKHTXHVWLRQQDLUHDGGUHVVHGWKHSDUWLFLSDQWV·SHUVRQDOH[SHULHQFH

with pregnant women requesting less care than indicated during pregnancy and birth.

A minority of both midwives and gynaecologists experienced an increase in ZRPHQZLWKKLJKULVNSUHJQDQFLHVZDQWLQJDKRPHELUWKRYHUWKHODVWÀYH\HDUV

Community midwives were less convinced this phenomenon had increased RYHUWKHODVWÀYH\HDUVWKDQKRVSLWDOVWDͿ YVS  2IWKH

FRPPXQLW\ PLGZLYHV  KDG UHFHLYHG D UHTXHVW IRU OHVV FDUH LQ WKH \HDU

EHIRUHWKHVXUYH\YHUVXVRIKRVSLWDOVWDͿ S  7KHUHZDVQRGLͿHUHQFH

between caregivers with more than 10 years or less than or equal to 10 years of experience in maternity care.

The most frequently mentioned maternal requests were declining testing IRUJHVWDWLRQDOGLDEHWHV  RSWLQJIRUDKRPHELUWKLQFDVHRIDKLJKULVN

SUHJQDQF\   DQG GHFOLQLQJ IRHWDO PRQLWRULQJ ERWK FRQWLQXRXV DQG

LQWHUPLWWHQW  GXULQJ ODERXU   +RVSLWDO VWDͿ UHSRUWHG VLJQLÀFDQWO\ PRUH

declining foetal monitoring, assisted vaginal birth (ventouse or forceps) and FDHVDUHDQ VHFWLRQ DQG FRPPXQLW\ PLGZLYHV UHSRUWHG VLJQLÀFDQWO\ PRUH

requests for home birth in high risk pregnancies, declining diabetes testing, and women planning UC (Table 2). However, only a small minority of participants in both levels of care reported to have received any of the requests mentioned above more than twice in the previous year, with the exception of declining diabetes testing, which was quite prevalent.

The most frequently given medical reasons for recommending hospital birth in women requesting home birth against medical advice concerned a high ERG\ PDVV LQGH[ %0,    SRVW WHUP SUHJQDQF\   DQG D SUHYLRXV

FDHVDUHDQ VHFWLRQ   +RVSLWDO VWDͿ VLJQLÀFDQWO\ PRUH RIWHQ UHFHLYHG

requests for home birth from women with a previous caesarean section and women who had a breech position or a twin pregnancy, whereas community PLGZLYHVZHUHVLJQLÀFDQWO\PRUHRIWHQFRQIURQWHGZLWKUHTXHVWVIRUKRPHELUWK

LQFDVHRIDKLJK%0, 7DEOH 9HU\IHZSDUWLFLSDQWVHQFRXQWHUHGPRUHWKDQÀYH

of any of these requests in that year, and no participants had received more than ÀYHUHTXHVWVIRUDKRPHEUHHFKRUWZLQELUWKLQWKHSUHYLRXV\HDU

 6LJQLÀFDQWO\ PRUH FRPPXQLW\ PLGZLYHV WKDQ KRVSLWDO VWDͿ UHSRUWHG KDYLQJ

GHFOLQHGRQHRUPRUHUHTXHVWIRUOHVVFDUHWKDQUHFRPPHQGHGYV

S  2QDYHUDJHEHWZHHQERWKKRVSLWDOVWDͿDQGFRPPXQLW\PLGZLYHV

 GHFOLQHG DW OHDVW RQH UHTXHVW IRU OHVV FDUH 0RVW IUHTXHQWO\ LQGLFDWHG

UHDVRQV IRU GHFOLQLQJ E\ ERWK OHYHOV RI FDUH ZHUH ´ZDQW WR KDYH LQWHUYHQWLRQ

SRVVLELOLWLHVLIQHFHVVDU\µDQG´GRQ·WZDQWWREH PRUDOO\ UHVSRQVLEOHIRUDEDG

RXWFRPHµ2WKHUUHDVRQVZHUH´KDUPIXOIRULQWHUGLVFLSOLQDU\FRRSHUDWLRQµ´QRW

528107-L-sub01-bw-Hollander

Processed on: 23-1-2019 PDF page: 129PDF page: 129PDF page: 129PDF page: 129

6

IHHOLQJ FRPSHWHQWµ ´IHDU IRU OHJDO UHSHUFXVVLRQVµ DQG ´IHDU RI UHSXWDWLRQ

GDPDJHµ7KHUHZDVDVLJQLÀFDQWGLͿHUHQFHUHJDUGLQJIHDUIRUOHJDOUHSHUFXVVLRQV

EHWZHHQFRPPXQLW\PLGZLYHVDQGKRVSLWDOVWDͿ YVS  In cases where requests for less care are not honoured by the caregiver, UHIHUUDOWRDFROOHDJXHLVSRVVLEOH6LJQLÀFDQWO\PRUHFRPPXQLW\PLGZLYHVWKDQ

KRVSLWDO VWDͿ KDYH DYDLOHG WKHPVHOYHV RI WKLV RSWLRQ DW OHDVW RQFH  YV

S  :KHQVHULRXVO\FRQFHUQHGIRUWKHKHDOWKRIWKHXQERUQFKLOG

some participants reported a pregnant woman to child protective services—

ZKLFKKDVQROHJDOMXVWLÀFDWLRQLQ'XWFKODZDOWKRXJKLQFLGHQFHVRIWKLVZHUH

more than 60 min extra.

A small and comparable minority of both community midwives and KRVSLWDO VWDͿ LQGLFDWHG KDYLQJ SHUIRUPHG SUHJQDQF\ FKHFNV RQ ZRPHQ ZKR

SODQQHGD8&LQWKHSUHYLRXV\HDU YVS  $PRQJFRPPXQLW\

PLGZLYHV  UHSRUWHG WKDW WKH\ KDG EHHQ FDOOHG WR DVVLVW GXULQJ RU DIWHU D

SODQQHG8&DWOHDVWRQFHYVRIKRVSLWDOVWDͿZKRKDGUHFHLYHG8&ZRPHQ

Table 2 Nature of requests for less care according to participants

Requesta Regular community

midwives (%)

Hospital VWD; 

p-value

Wanting home birth in high risk pregnancy

72.5 57.3 

Refusal of diabetes testing 77.1 54.2 

Refusal of foetal monitoring 28.6 51.2 

Refusal of assisted vaginal delivery 21.9 48.0 

Wanting unassisted childbirth 18.1 11.8 0.03

Refusal of indicated caesarean section 10.8 26.5 

a5DUH UHIXVDOV PHQWLRQHG OHVV WKDQ ÀYH WLPHV LQ WKH IUHH WH[W ÀHOGV  ZHUH ODERXU DXJPHQWDWLRQ

pelvic exams, active management of the third stage, manual placental removal, routine lab testing, routine ultrasounds, doptone during antenatal checks, number of routine antenatal checks, biometric ultrasound for suspicion of IUGR or macrosomia, indicated antibiotic prophylaxis, episiotomy, vitamin K, PKU testing for the neonate and precautionary iv access during labour.

6LJQLÀFDQWGLͿHUHQFH

528107-L-sub01-bw-Hollander 528107-L-sub01-bw-Hollander 528107-L-sub01-bw-Hollander 528107-L-sub01-bw-Hollander Processed on: 23-1-2019

Processed on: 23-1-2019 Processed on: 23-1-2019

Processed on: 23-1-2019 PDF page: 130PDF page: 130PDF page: 130PDF page: 130

Table 3 Requests for home delivery according to the indication for secondary care IndicationbcA: Community midwives N (%)

B: Hospital VWD; N (%)

C: Holistic midwivesd N (%)

p-value (between A and B)p-value (between A and C) BMI>40198 (48.4)123 (34.1)13 (61.9) 0.34 Post term pregnancy157 (38.5)123 (34.4)18 (85.8)0.49  Previous caesarean section111 (27.2)124 (38.8)16 (76.2)  Ruptured membranes >24 hrs118 (29.1)85 (23.7)13 (61.9)0.18 Previous PPH > 2 litres77 (19.1)71 (19.7)8 (38.1)0.98  Hypertensive disorders48 (11.9)61 (17.0)11 (52.4)0.13 0.11 Preterm delivery49 (12.3)35 (9.8)11 (52.4)0.28  Breech birth8 (2.0)34 (9.5)9 (39.1)  Diabetes requiring insulin11 (2.8)15 (4.2)3 (N/A)0.52 N/A Twin birth5 (1.2)18 (5.0)2 (N/A) N/A Declined requests for home delivery in case of at least one of the above indications

201 (48.6)105 (27.9)16 (66.7) 0.08 Been called for help with an UC39 (9.6)26 (6.2)6 (28.6)0.07 b5DUHLQGLFDWLRQV PHQWLRQHGOHVVWKDQÀYHWLPHVLQWKHIUHHWH[WÀHOGV ZHUH,8*5-HKRYDK·V:LWQHVVSRVLWLYHFXOWXUHIRU*%6 cTwin birth and diabetes requiring insulin were too rare in the group of holistic midwives to calculate. d0LGZLYHVZKRFODVVLÀHGWKHPVHOYHVDVZRUNLQJLQDKROLVWLFVHWWLQJ 6LJQFDQWGLͿHUHQFH

528107-L-sub01-bw-Hollander

Processed on: 23-1-2019 PDF page: 131PDF page: 131PDF page: 131PDF page: 131

6

LQWKHLUFOLQLF S  5HSRUWHGUHDVRQVIRUEHLQJFRQVXOWHGZHUH´FRPSOLFDWLRQV

GXULQJ ELUWKµ   ´SRVWSDUWXP FKHFN UHTXHVWHGµ   DQG ´ZRPDQ

FKDQJHGKHUPLQGµ  

Documento similar