In the second round we are administering a revised version of the questionnaire and interviewing key informants. In the second round of the retention survey currently underway, we have requested electronic responses to the survey instrument and follow-up telephone interviews are being recorded. This part of the article will summarize the results in each section of the questionnaire.
The next question asked respondents to identify problems, difficulties, or threats to the integrity of digital materials with any of the above techniques. The last question in this section asked if there was any evaluative data on the efficacy of the conservation method/model used by each respondent. Six institutions do not own the copyright to the electronic form of the records, while the question did not apply to seven respondents.
Ownership of copyright rests with the creator, owner, or government, depending on the institution. The viability of digitized files is much more dependent on the expected life of the access system. The majority of executives we interviewed now collect financial data and plan to report.
18Jeff Rothenberg now advocates the use of the term "inherently digital" to characterize executable, dynamic and interactive materials. This question will be followed up as part of the second phase of the research interviews. At the time of these interviews, none of the respondents had yet gathered enough information to determine the categories of conservation costs or cost modeling protocols.
Only three of the projects/institutions indicated that they have policies in place; two others revise existing policies to include electronic records;. Two of the research projects indicated that policy development would result from their research. During round two of the conservation study, we will interview key informants/experts who can shed more light on policy issues.
As the institutions and projects progress, we expect to be able to collect hard data in rounds two and three of the survey. The second round of conservation research will focus on expanding our knowledge in several areas. It is as apt a description of electronic preservation as it is a description of the accidental publication of an enduring work of literature.
It takes a snapshot of the information and gives you everything you need to see it.
Program and Policy
A wide range of materials, i.e. researching library articles, as possible and being viewed on CD. You are working with an art museum consortium - Art and information about the object, including 2 levels of metadata:. Do you make any special provisions for data storage, compared to other types of digital materials.
Has the program or activity reached the point of testing or evaluating any of the methods or techniques you use. When choosing a preservation method or strategy, have you considered the effect it might have on the intellectual integrity (eg authenticity and reliability) of the digital material. If so, can you prove/demonstrate that the intellectual integrity of the digital material has not been compromised by the preservation process.
They are looking to move up to a document management (ERM) program to support audit trail development.
Selection for Preservation
您认为您所在机构的保存方法或技术的优势是什么？您认为贵机构保存方法或技术的弱点是什么？㛭阅读更多㛭㛭㛭㛭㛭㛭㛭㛭㛭㛭您估计维护记录的成本是多少。
Are preserved records available only on-site (3) only within the institution (1) via website (6) other (specify) (2) ((1) hard copy; (2) copyrighted material on at the will of the [academic] community only.). If they create remote access to electronic replacement documents, they will charge for download/browsing, which are value-added services.
