• No se han encontrado resultados

S&P 500 and VIX Index

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "S&P 500 and VIX Index"

Copied!
28
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

El Futuro Económico de América Latina:

El Futuro Económico de América Latina:

¿Hecho en China?

¿Hecho en China?

1 1

Ciudad de Guatemala Ciudad de Guatemala

28

28--29 de febrero del 2012 29 de febrero del 2012

Oficina del Economista Jefe Oficina del Economista Jefe América Latina y el Caribe América Latina y el Caribe Banco Mundial

Banco Mundial

(2)

El entorno global El entorno global El entorno global El entorno global

Turbulencia financiera coyuntural Turbulencia financiera coyuntural

2

(3)

Coyuntura global marcada por fragilidad y Coyuntura global marcada por fragilidad y volatilidad financiera

volatilidad financiera

1200 1400 1600 1800

60 70 80 90

VIX Index

S&P 500 and VIX Index

VIX Index S&P500 (rhs)

Sources: Bloomberg. 3

0 200 400 600 800 1000

0 10 20 30 40 50

Jan-07 Jun-07 Nov-07 Apr-08 Sep-08 Feb-09 Jul-09 Dec-09 May-10 Oct-10 Mar-11 Aug-11 Jan-12 S&P 500

VIX Index

(4)

El epicentro europeo El epicentro europeo

La reversión de las fortunas La reversión de las fortunas

South Africa Romania Russia Brazil Vietnam Peru Panama Colombia Indonesia Phillipines Tukey Kazakhastan Ukrain Venezuela Argentina

Global Sovereign CDS 31-Dec-2007, in basis points

Turkey Slovak Rep Bulgaria Spain Romania Italy Croatia avg Hungary Ireland Argentina Ukraine Venezuela Portugal Greece

Global Sovereign CDS Feb-2012, in basis points

Notes: In panel A, for Ireland we use the first CDS quote available (August 2008). Sources: Bloomberg. 4

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Sweden Germany France Belgium Spain Portugal Slovak Rep Ireland Greece Italy Poland Chile Malaysia Korea Hungary Thailand Croatia Mexico Bulgaria South Africa

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Sweden Germany Chile Panama Malaysia Colombia Mexico Brazil Korea Peru Phillipines France Indonesia South Africa Thailand Russia Belgium Poland Kazakhastan Turkey

(5)

El epicentro europeo El epicentro europeo

Trauma y drama

Trauma y drama – – ¿cuánto más por venir? ¿cuánto más por venir?

1500 2000 2500

CDS (5 years) in Europe In Basis Points

Ireland+Greece+Portugal France

UK Spain Italy

Notes: In panel A, for Ireland we use the first CDS quote available (August 2008). Sources: Bloomberg. 5 0

500 1000 1500

Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11

Italy

(6)

El epicentro europeo El epicentro europeo

1 moneda, 17 deudas soberanas 1 moneda, 17 deudas soberanas

15%

20%

25%

Spreads Over German Bonds In %

Official Launch of the Euro

Portugal Greece Ireland

Source: Bloomberg 6

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

Mar-93 Apr-94 May-95 Jun-96 Jul-97 Aug-98 Sep-99 Oct-00 Nov-01 Jan-03 Feb-04 Mar-05 Apr-06 May-07 Jun-08 Jul-09 Aug-10 Sep-11

Ireland France Italy Spain

(7)

El epicentro europeo El epicentro europeo

Heterogeneidad estructural y la trampa CDM Heterogeneidad estructural y la trampa CDM

120 140 160 180 200

Unit Labor Costs in Europe Index base 100 = q1-2000

Germany Italy Portugal Greece France Spain

20.0%

Debt Sustainability in Europe Theoretical vs Actual Primary Balance

Actual

7

80 100

Q1-2000 Q3-2000 Q1-2001 Q3-2001 Q1-2002 Q3-2002 Q1-2003 Q3-2003 Q1-2004 Q3-2004 Q1-2005 Q3-2005 Q1-2006 Q3-2006 Q1-2007 Q3-2007 Q1-2008 Q3-2008 Q1-2009 Q3-2009 Q1-2010 Q3-2010 Q1-2011

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

Greece France Ireland Portugal Italy Spain

% of GDP

Actual Theoretical

Source: EuroStats and Bloomberg. For panel B, the theoretical primary balances is calculated using the last observation of the nominal interests rates on 10ys bonds, and assuming a long term inflation and growth of 1.5% and 2%, respectively.

(8)

El epicentro estadounidence El epicentro estadounidence

Débil recuperación económica: Keynes vs. Fischer Débil recuperación económica: Keynes vs. Fischer

5.0%

10.0%

60 70

Industrial Production and ISM Index Industrial Production (YoY %)

110 115 120 125 130 135

Index base 100 = Iq -2003

US Economic Activity GDP Index base 100 = Iq - 2003

2003-2007 trend

Sources: Consensus Forecasts (Feb-2012)and Bloomberg. 8

-20.0%

-15.0%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Industrial Production (YoY)

ISM Index

ISM Index

Industrial Production 90

95 100 105 110

Mar-03 Dec-03 Sep-04 Jun-05 Mar-06 Dec-06 Sep-07 Jun-08 Mar-09 Dec-09 Sep-10 Jun-11 Mar-12

Index base 100 = Iq

(9)

El epicentro

El epicentro estadounidence estadounidence

Menor calificación crediticia pero el lugar de refugio Menor calificación crediticia pero el lugar de refugio

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

Percent

USD

Gold and US T10 2011-2012

110 115

Foreign Currencies Per Dollar Index base 100 = 1-Jan-2011

Yen UK Pound

Euro Real

Source: Bloomberg 9

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

1200 1300 1400 1500

Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov Dec-11 Dec-11 Jan-12

Gold US T10

90 95 100 105

Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12

(10)

El entorno global El entorno global El entorno global El entorno global

Multipolaridad económica Multipolaridad económica

10

(11)

Desacoplamiento cíclico

Desacoplamiento cíclico – – centro vs. periferia centro vs. periferia

95 100 105 110 115 120

World Industrial Production Index Apr-08 = 100

Crisis

Advanced Economies Emerging Economies

8% 11% 8%

100%

Contribution to World Economic GDP as a % of World GDP increase (PPP)

Note: The group of developed countries refers to OECD countries excluding Turkey, Mexico, Republic of Korea, and Central European 11

countries. Source: CPB (Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis).

80 85 90

Jan-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Oct-07 May-08 Dec-08 Jul-09 Feb-10 Sep-10 Apr-11

51%

38%

27%

34%

44%

57%

8% 7% 8%

8% 11% 8%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

1996-2001 2001-2006 2009-2011

Others Other Advanced Economies

EM - 20 Euro (15)+US+Japan+Canada+UK

(12)

Cambios tectónicos en la distribución de la Cambios tectónicos en la distribución de la actividad económica global

actividad económica global

70%

80%

90%

100%

Share of World GDP

Advanced economies

Emerging and developing economies

China

Source: IMF WEO (September 2011) 12

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

(13)

Implicaciones para América Latina Implicaciones para América Latina

13

(14)

Crecimiento reciente y pronósticos para el 2012 Crecimiento reciente y pronósticos para el 2012

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

Jamaica El Salvador Trin. & Tob. Guatemala Nicaragua Mexico Brazil LAC Argentina Costa Rica Bolivia Ecuador Paraguay Venezuela Chile Uruguay Colombia Dom. Rep. Peru Panama

Actual Growth and Growth Forecast: LAC Countries Weighted Averages for LAC

2011e 2012f

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

High Income

South Africa

Europe &

Central Latin America &

East Asian Tigers

India China

GDP per capita PPP

% Growth Rate

Real GDP Growth Forecasts Around the World Annual Real GDP Growth Rate, Weighted Averages

14

Jamaica El Salvador Trin. & Tob. Guatemala Nicaragua Mexico Brazil LAC Argentina Costa Rica Bolivia Ecuador Paraguay Venezuela Chile Uruguay Colombia Dom. Rep. Peru Panama

Income Africa Central Asia

America &

Caribbean Tigers

2010 2011 2012 GDP per capita PPP (2010)

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%

Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12

LAC 2012 GDP Growth Forecasts Evolution In %

LAC (weighted average) Guatemala

Sources: Consensus Forecast (Feb- 2012), and IMF WEO (September 2011)

(15)

Desigual desempeño económico en la región Desigual desempeño económico en la región

La heterogeneidad ha ido mutando en la última década La heterogeneidad ha ido mutando en la última década

80 100 120 140 160 180

Low-Growth Countries GDP Index 2002=100

Actual

2003-2007 Trend

80 100 120 140 160 180

Intermediate-Growth Countries GDP Index 2002=100

Actual

2003-2007 Trend

Sources: Potential GPD is computed as the average rate of growth between 2007 and 2003. Simple averages are used to construct the composite. The categorization of each group is as 15

follow: Slow-growth are those countries that showed a less than 3.5% in their 2011-2008 GDP real growth rate; Medium-growth are those between 3.5% and 10%: High-growth are those with 10% or more. WEO (September– 2011).

80

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

80

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

80 100 120 140 160 180

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

High-Growth Countries GDP Index 2002=100

Actual 2003-2007 Trend

80 100 120 140 160 180

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Guatemala GDP Index 2002=100

Actual

2003-2007 Trend

(16)

Desigual desempeño económico Desigual desempeño económico

Importa menos la ubicación que la conexión Importa menos la ubicación que la conexión

(Geometric) Mean growth

2003-2007 Simple Average

(Geometric) Mean growth

2007-2009 Simple Average

(Geometric) Mean growth

2009-2012 Simple Average

Min.

2009-2012

Max.

2009-2012

Low growth (13) 4.9% -1.6% 1.3% -0.1% 4.3%

Medium growth (7) 4.5% 1.7% 3.4% 2.6% 4.4%

Guatemala 4.5% 3.6% 3.9% 3.9% 3.9%

Sources: World Bank’s World Development Indicators – WDI (December 2010), IMF's World Economic Outlook – WEO (April 2011), and Consensus Forecasts (June 2011) – 16

Latest available forecasts. Potential GDP is calculated computing the annual average real growth rate for the 2002-2007 to 2007 GDP. Weighted averages (2007 Nominal GDP in USD Billions).

Low growth: Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Dominica, El Salvador, Grenada, Jamaica, Mexico , St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, St. Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela

Intermediate growth: Belize, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala , Haiti, Honduras, and Nicaragua

High growth: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic , Guyana, Panama , Paraguay, Peru, Suriname and Uruguay

Guatemala 4.5% 3.6% 3.9% 3.9% 3.9%

High growth (12) 5.9% 4.5% 6.0% 4.5% 8.7%

LAC (all countries) 4.8% 1.1% 3.5% -0.1% 8.7%

(17)

La creciente pero desigual conexión con China…

La creciente pero desigual conexión con China…

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Output Co-Movement Between LAC and China 20 years rolling correlation of the Real GDP Growth

Brazil Chile

Colombia Mexico

Peru Argentina

Panama Dom. Rep.

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% of Total Exports

Main Trade Partners by Exports 2009

17

-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2

1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Belize Bahamas St.Vinc.& Grenada El Salvador Nicaragua Guatemala Panama Barbados Paraguay Dominica Trin.&Tob. Honduras Suriname Guyana Jamaica Dom. Rep. Mexico Colombia Bolivia Ecuador Argentina Venezuela Uruguay Costa Rica Brazil Peru Chile

% of Total Exports

World UE15 LAC USA CHN

(18)

… está fuertemente mediatizada por

… está fuertemente mediatizada por commodities commodities

Costa Rica Panama Jamaica Brazil Guatemala Mexico Uruguay Colombia LAC Argentina Ecuador Chile Peru

Cumulative Change in Terms of Trade Monthly Data, Avg. 2002Q1 vs. Avg. 2011Q1

30 50 70 90 110 130 150

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Oil WTI, Current US$

Wheat, Copper and Soybean, Index 01-Jan-05=100

Commodity Prices

Oil WTI in Current US$, Wheat, Copper and Soybean: Index base Jan-05=100

18

-20% 10% 40% 70% 100% 130%

Honduras 30

50

Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12

0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

Feb-92 Dec-92 Oct-93 Aug-94 Jun-95 Apr-96 Feb-97 Dec-97 Oct-98 Aug-99 Jun-00 Apr-01 Feb-02 Dec-02 Oct-03 Aug-04 Jun-05 Apr-06 Feb-07 Dec-07 Oct-08 Aug-09 Jun-10 Apr-11 Feb-12

Terms of Trade Px/Pm Index 2005 = 100 LAC 6 Average

Guatemala

(19)

En el corto plazo el foco está en la vulnerabilidad En el corto plazo el foco está en la vulnerabilidad

El sistema inmunológico macro de LAC ha mejorado El sistema inmunológico macro de LAC ha mejorado

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8 8.2 8.4 8.6

06 06 06 06 07 07 07 07 08 08 08 08 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 12

Exchange Rate and Interest Rate in Guatemala

Nominal Exchange Rate Interest Rate

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9

Exchange Rate and Interest Rate in Guatemala

Series1 Series2

19

Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20

Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12

Interest Rates in LAC

Monetary Policy Rates Inflation-Targeting LAC Countries

Fed Funds Target Brazil Chile Colombia Peru Mexico Guatemala

Jan-97 Jun-97 Nov-97 Apr-98 Sep-98 Feb-99 Jul-99 Dec-99 May-00 Oct-00 Mar-01 Aug-01 Jan-02 Jun-02 Nov-02 Apr-03 Sep-03 Feb-04 Jul-04 Dec-04 May-05 Oct-05 Mar-06 Aug-06

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Colombia Brazil Chile Mexico Peru Guatemala

Exchange Rate Flexibility Reinhart and Kenneth S. Rogoff Index

1998 2010

Notes: The Exchange Rate Flexibility Index is between 1 (totally rigid exchange rate regime) and 13 (freely floating exchange regime.

(20)

El foco de largo plazo es crecimiento con equidad El foco de largo plazo es crecimiento con equidad

¿

¿ Cómo salir de los 100 años de soledad en el crecimiento? Cómo salir de los 100 años de soledad en el crecimiento?

60%

70%

80%

90%

GDP Per Capita of Relative to the US Selected Regions, Weighted Averages

Washington Dissensus Gold Standard

Period

Interwar Period Import Substitution Washington

Consensus Lost

Decade

Avg 61-70 Avg 71-80 Avg 81-90 Avg 91-00 Avg 01-08 Avg 61-08

LAC 7 1.9% 0.4% -2.0% 0.2% 1.0% 0.3%

Non - LAC 7 1.1% 0.5% -2.0% 0.1% 1.2% 0.2%

Costa Rica 2.2% -1.3% -2.6% 0.2% 0.2% -0.3%

Average TFP growth per year

20

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

1900 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

LAC EAP: High Income Guatemala

Costa Rica 2.2% -1.3% -2.6% 0.2% 0.2% -0.3%

Dominican Republic 0.1% 0.2% -0.8% 2.3% 1.7% 0.7%

El Salvador 0.9% -1.6% -1.9% 0.5% 0.0% -0.4%

Guatemala 2.1% 1.2% -1.7% 0.4% -0.6% 0.3%

Honduras 0.3% 1.0% -1.3% -2.7% 1.2% -0.3%

Nicaragua 2.2% -1.4% -3.8% -1.4% -1.3% -1.1%

Trinidad &Tobago 3.0% -1.3% -3.0% 3.3% 8.1% 2.0%

EAP 3.1% 2.1% 2.3% 1.3% 2.0% 2.2%

China -0.5% 0.9% 1.6% 3.4% 6.2% 2.3%

United States 0.9% -0.4% 1.1% 1.0% 0.6% 0.6%

Japan 6.7% 1.1% 1.4% -0.7% 0.9% 1.9%

(21)

Guatemala está entre los países de “resago estable”

Guatemala está entre los países de “resago estable”

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Diverging

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Non-Converging

Notes: Maddison (2007-2009) was used from 1900 to 2006 and Real Per Capita GDP growth from WDI was used to calculate the levels from 2006 to 2010. Source: LCRCE 21

Staff calculations based on Maddison (2007, 2009) and WDI.

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Venezuela Argentina Uruguay

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Colombia Guatemala El Salvador Bolivia Paraguay

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Fluctuating

Mexico Brazil

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Semi-Converging

Chile Dominican Republic

(22)

Las cortapisas al crecimiento de largo plazo Las cortapisas al crecimiento de largo plazo Ahorro e inversión bajas

Ahorro e inversión bajas

25%

30%

35%

Gross Domestic Savings Decade Average

LAC-7 EAP Guatemala

25%

30%

35%

40%

Investment Decade Average

LAC-7 EAP Guatemala

Notes: In Panel A, EAP includes Hong Kong, Indonesia, Korea Rep., Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand. In Panel B, EAP includes Hong Kong, Indonesia, Korea Rep., Malaysia, 22

Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand. Both in Panel A and B, LAC-7 includes Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela. Sources: WDI, Penn World Tables, and The International Energy Agency (IEA).

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

1960's 1970's 1980's 1990's 2000's

% of GDP

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

1960's 1970's 1980's 1990's 2000's

% of GDP

(23)

En Guatemala En Guatemala

Insuficientes recursos para bienes públicos Insuficientes recursos para bienes públicos

30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

Tax revenues by type of taxes

% GDP Direct tax revenues

Indirect tax revenues Social contributions Other taxes

23 0.0

10.0 20.0 30.0

1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010

Guatemala Venezuela Honduras Chile USA Argentina Brasil OECD Suecia

(24)

Las cortapisas al crecimiento de largo plazo Las cortapisas al crecimiento de largo plazo

Brechas de infraestructura Brechas de infraestructura

1.0 1.2 1.4

Electricity Installed Capacity In thousands of KW per 1000 people, simple averages

EAP

LAC7 + URY Guatemala

0.0060 0.0070 0.0080 0.0090

Road Density

In thousands of KM per 1000 people, simple average

LAC7 + URY

Guatemala (available data)

24

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 0.0000 0.0010 0.0020 0.0030 0.0040 0.0050

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

(25)

Las cortapisas al crecimiento de largo plazo Las cortapisas al crecimiento de largo plazo

Brechas institucionales Brechas institucionales

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Control of Corruption

Guatemala

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Rule of Law

Guatemala

25

Source: D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi 2003: G

-2

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Log of GDP per capita PPP in 2010

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Log of GDP per capita PPP in 2010

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Log of GDP per capita PPP in 2010 Regulatory Quality

Guatemala

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Log of GDP per capita PPP in 2010 Government Effectiveness

Guatemala

(26)

Las cortapisas al crecimiento de largo plazo Las cortapisas al crecimiento de largo plazo

Brechas en capital humano Brechas en capital humano

9.7

29.3 20.3

East Asian Tigers 2010 7.9

40.3 37.5

14.2 LAC-7

2010

46.7

40.6

9.9 2.8

Guatemala 1990

No School Primary Secondary Tertiary

Source: Author’s calculation based on Household datasets and Barro-Lee (2010) 26

19.3

40.9 29.7

10

East Asian Tigers 1990 16.4

51 23.1

9.5 LAC-7

1990

40.7

46.7

40.6

9.9 2.8

Guatemala 1990

No School Primary Secondary Tertiary

(27)

Gracias Gracias

27

Gracias

Gracias

Referencias

Documento similar

Ambas misiones se desa- rrollaron en Costa Rica y Guatemala, que actuaron como punto de encuentro también para Nicaragua, Panamá y El Salvador.. Las actividades

La investigación realizada se basó en una encuesta representativa de ocho países de América Latina (Argentina, Perú, México, República Dominicana, Costa Rica, Brasil, Chile y

La Revista Estudios es editada por la Universidad de Costa Rica y se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Costa Rica. Para

Gano Itouch Costa Rica S.A 4.9 millones. Gano Excel Colombia S.A

However, it is noteworthy that Uruguay and Paraguay have the highest economic growth rates for per capita GDP (gross domestic product). Brazil and Argentina

4 A manera de ejemplo, recordemos los casos de Andrés Bello res- pecto a Venezuela y Chile, Antonio José de Irisarri (Guatemala, Chile, Colombia), Simón Rodríguez (Venezuela,

1 Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,

Despite this trend change in the Spanish economy, at the end of the period analyzed, Brazil remained the leading receiving country in terms of Spanish FDI.Regarding market