• No se han encontrado resultados

Downloaded from UvA-DARE, the institutional repository of the University of Amsterdam (UvA)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Downloaded from UvA-DARE, the institutional repository of the University of Amsterdam (UvA)"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

Downloaded from UvA-DARE, the institutional repository of the University of Amsterdam (UvA)

http://hdl.handle.net/11245/2.172381

File ID uvapub:172381

Filename Cover / Title pages / Table of contents

Version final

SOURCE (OR PART OF THE FOLLOWING SOURCE):

Type PhD thesis

Title The religious polemics of the Muslims of Late Medieval Christian Iberia:

Identity and religious authority in Mudejar Islam Author(s) M. Colominas Aparicio

Faculty FGw

Year 2016

FULL BIBLIOGRAPHIC DETAILS:

 

http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.527617

Copyright

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content licence (like Creative Commons).

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl) (pagedate: 2016-04-15)

(2)

   

The Religious Polemics of the Muslims of Late Medieval Christian Iberia

Identity and Religious Authority in Mudejar Islam  

 

                   

 

Mònica Colominas Aparicio

 

  Th e R eli gio us P ole m ic s o f the M us lim s o f L ate M ed ie va l C hr ist ia n I be ria M òn ic a C olo m in as A pa ric io

(3)

All M.C. Escher works © 2015 The M.C. Escher Company - the Netherlands. All rights reserved. Used by permission. www.mcescher.com

(4)

The Religious Polemics of the Muslims of Late Medieval Christian Iberia

Identity and Religious Authority in Mudejar Islam

ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT

ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam

op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. D.C. van den Boom

ten overstaan van een door het College voor Promoties ingestelde commissie, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Aula der Universiteit

op vrijdag 29 april 2016, te 13.00 uur

door Mònica Colominas Aparicio

geboren te Barcelona, Spanje

(5)

Promotiecommissie

Promotor: prof. dr. G.A. Wiegers Universiteit van Amsterdam Copromotores: prof. dr. M. García-Arenal Consejo Superior de

Investigaciones Científicas dr. R.L.A. van Leeuwen Universiteit van Amsterdam

Overige leden: prof. dr. C. Adang University of Tel Aviv prof. dr. M.L.M. van Berkel Radboud Universiteit prof. dr. G. Geltner Universiteit van Amsterdam dr. T.A.M. Smidt van Gelder-Fontaine Universiteit van Amsterdam dr. O.J. Zwartjes Universiteit van Amsterdam Faculteit: Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen

The research of this doctoral thesis received financial assistance from:

Netherlands Interuniversity School for Islamic Studies (NISIS)

Project Conversion, Overlapping, Religiosities, Polemics and Interaction (CORPI), ERC, CSIC, Madrid

Catharine van Tussenbroekfonds

! !

!

! !

(6)

Per a l’Esteve i la Carlota Roser

(7)

! !

(8)

T ABLE OF CONTENTS

!

A

CKNOWLEDGMENTS

! 7!

N

OTE!ON!

T

RANSLITERATION

,

!

C

ONVENTIONS!AND!

A

BBREVIATIONS

! 9!

L

IST!OF!

F

IGURES

! 11!

INTRODUCTION! 13!

M

UDEJAR!

P

OLEMICS

! 20!

S

CHOLARSHIP!ON!THE!

M

UDEJARS!AND!THEIR!

L

ITERATURE

! 24!

M

AIN!

Q

UESTIONS!AND!

C

HAPTER!

O

VERVIEW

! 26!

CHAPTER!ONE:!THE!CONNECTION!BETWEEN!RELIGIOUS!POLEMICS!AND!

NOTIONS!OF!IDENTITY!AND!RELIGIOUS!AUTHORITY!AMONG!THE!MUDEJARS

! 31!

I

NTRODUCTION

! 31!

1.1.

!

T

HE!

S

ACRED!

L

AW

,

!OR!

S

HARĪ!!

͑

A

! 34!

1.2.

!

T

HE!

R

ELATIONSHIP!OF!THE!

M

UDEJARS!WITH!

J

EWS!AND!

C

HRISTIANS

! 38!

1.3.

!

T

HE!

M

UDEJAR!

A

LJAMAS

! 41!

1.3.1.

!

C

HRISTIAN!

P

ROSELYTISM!AND!

R

ESTRICTIONS!ON!THE!

M

UDEJARS

! 41!

1.3.2.

!

R

ELIGIOUS!

A

UTHORITY!AND!

P

OLEMICS!IN!THE!

M

UDEJAR!ALJAMAS

! 45!

C

ONCLUSIONS

! 49!

CHAPTER!TWO:!CONCEPTS!AND!METHODS!FOR!THE!STUDY!OF!RELIGIOUS!

AUTHORITY!AND!IDENTITY!IN!THE!RELIGIOUS!POLEMICS!OF!THE!

MUDEJARS! 51!

I

NTRODUCTION

! 51!

2.1.

!

R

ECENT!

A

PPROACHES!TO!

R

ELIGIOUS!

P

OLEMICS

! 52!

2.2.

!

T

OWARDS!A!

D

EFINITION!OF!

M

UDEJAR!

P

OLEMICS

! 57!

2.3.

!

T

HEORETICAL!

F

RAMEWORK!AND!

M

ETHODS

! 63!

2.3.1.

!

B

AUMANN

S!

‘G

RAMMARS!OF!

I

DENTITY

/A

LTERITY

’! 63!

2.3.2.

!

S

OCIAL!

I

DENTITY!

T

HEORY

! 64!

2.3.3.

!

C

RITICAL!

D

ISCOURSE!

A

NALYSIS

! 68!

C

ONCLUSIONS

! 69!

CHAPTER!THREE:!PREVIOUS!RESEARCH!AND!IDENTIFICATION!OF!THE!

MUDEJAR!POLEMICAL!SOURCES!TO!BE!DISCUSSED!IN!THE!PRESENT!

DISSERTATION! 71!

3.1.

!

T

WENTIETH

K

!AND!

T

WENTY

KF

IRST!

C

ENTURY!

S

CHOLARLY!

V

IEWS!ON!

M

UDEJAR!

M

ANUSCRIPTS!OF!

R

ELIGIOUS!

P

OLEMICS

! 71!

A

)

!

S

CHOLARSHIP!BEFORE!

1950:

!

M

IGUEL!

A

SÍN!

P

ALACIOS

! 71!

(9)

B

)

!

S

CHOLARSHIP!AFTER!

1950:

!

L

EONARD!

P

ATRICK!

H

ARVEY

,

!

L

EON!

J

ACOB!

K

ASSIN!AND!

L

OUIS!

C

ARDAILLAC

! 73!

C

)

!

R

ECENT!

S

CHOLARSHIP

:

!

P

IETER!

S

JOERD!

V

AN!

K

ONINGSVELD!AND!

G

ERARD!

A

LBERT!

W

IEGERS

! 74!

3.2.

!

M

UDEJAR!

P

OLEMICAL!

S

OURCES

! 77!

A

)

!

T

HE!

K

ITĀB!

M

IFTĀḤ!AD

KD

ĪN

! 78!

B

)

!

T

HE!

DEMANDAS!DE!LOS!JUDÍOS

!

[‘Q

UESTIONS!

[

ASKED

]

!BY!THE!

J

EWS

’]! 79!

C

)

!

T

HE!

T

A

YĪD!AL

KM

ILLA

! 82!

D

)

!

T

HE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA!MA

ʿ

A!

K

L

KY

AHŪD!WA

K

N

KN

AṢĀRĀ

! 90!

3.3.

!

T

HE!

S

OURCES!OF!THE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

! 99!

3.3.1.

!

T

HE!

M

USLIM!

S

OURCES!OF!THE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

:

!

T

HE!MAQĀLĀT!OF!THE!

!

QĀḌĪ!AL

KS

HARAFĪ

! 100!

3.3.2.

!

T

HE!

C

HRISTIAN!

S

OURCES!OF!THE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

! 104!

3.4.

!

T

HE!

P

LACE!OF!THE!

C

OPYING!OF!THE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

:

!

T

HE!

G

EOGRAPHICAL!

L

OCATION!OF!

P

IṬRŪLA

! 111!

3.4.1.

!

T

HE!

O

RTHOGRAPHY!OF!

P

IṬRŪLA

! 112!

3.4.2.

!

T

HE!

S

OCIO

K

HISTORICAL!AND!

I

NTELLECTUAL!

M

ILIEU!OF!

P

ÉTROLA!AND!

!

P

EDROLA!DURING!THE!

L

ATER!

M

IDDLE!

A

GES

! 113!

A

)

!

T

HE!

M

UDEJAR!

A

LJAMAS

! 113!

B

)

!

T

HE!

I

NTELLECTUAL!

A

CTIVITY

! 115!

C

)

!

T

HE!

C

HRISTIAN!

M

ISSIONARY!

A

CTIVITIES

! 116!

3.4.3.

!

T

HE!

I

NTERNAL!

E

VIDENCE!IN!

MS

!

AF

!

58! 118!

E

VALUATION

! 118!

C

ONCLUSIONS

! 119!

CHAPTER!FOUR:!MUSLIM!LITERATURE!OF!RELIGIOUS!POLEMICS! 121!

I

NTRODUCTION

! 121!

4.1.

!AL

KA

NDALUS

! 122!

A

)

!

I

BN!

AZM

! 122!

B

)

!AL

KK

HAZRAJĪ

! 128!

C

)

!AL

KQ

URṬUBĪ

! 129!

D

)

!

I

BN!

S

AB!

͑

ĪN

! 130!

E

)

!

Q

AM!

͑

!AL

KY

AHŪD

! 131!

4.2.

!

C

HRISTIAN!

I

BERIA

! 131!

A

)

!

M

UḤAMMAD!AL

KQ

AYSĪ

! 131!

4.3.

!

T

HE!

M

AGHREB

! 132!

A

)

!!

͑A

BD!AL

KḤ

AQQ!AL

KI

SLĀMĪ

! 132!

4.4.

!

T

HE!

M

ASHRIQ

! 133!

A

)

!

S

AMAW

AL!AL

KM

AGHRIBĪ

! 133!

B

)

!

A

BŪ!

B

AKR!AL

KF

IHRĪ!AL

KṬ

URṬUSHĪ

! 134!

C

)

!

N

AJM!AL

KD

ĪN!AL

KṬ

ŪFĪ

! 135!

C

ONCLUSIONS

! 136!

(10)

CHAPTER!FIVE:!MUDEJAR!POLEMICS!WITH!THE!JEWS! 137!

I

NTRODUCTION

! 137!

5.1.

!

T

HE!

T

A

YĪD

! 142!

5.1.1.

!

T

HE!LEVEL!OF!THE!KNOWLEDGE!OF!

A

RABIC!AND!

H

EBREW!OF!THE!

A

UTHOR!OF!!THE!

T

A

YĪD

! 145!

5.1.2.

!

T

HE!

K

NOWLEDGE!OF!THE!

T

ORAH!AMONG!THE!

M

UDEJARS

! 145!

5.1.3.

!

T

HE!

K

NOWLEDGE!OF!

J

UDAISM!OF!THE!

A

UTHOR!OF!THE!

T

A

YĪD

! 148!

5.1.4.

!

J

EWISH!

P

OLEMICS!AGAINST!

I

SLAM!IN!THE!

C

HRISTIAN!

T

ERRITORIES

! 149!

5.1.5.

!

J

EWISH

KC

HRISTIAN!

P

OLEMICS!IN!THE!

C

HRISTIAN!

T

ERRITORIES

! 152!

5.1.6.

!

T

HE!USE!OF!THE!

T

ORAH!IN!ANTI

KJ

EWISH!

P

OLEMICS!BY!

O

RIENTAL!

M

USLIM!

AUTHORS

! 155!

C

ONCLUDING!

R

EMARKS

! 159!

5.2.

!

T

HE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

! 160!

5.3.

!

T

HE!

DEMANDAS

!

[‘Q

UESTIONS

’]! 163!

C

ONCLUSIONS

! 172!

CHAPTER!SIX:!MUDEJAR!POLEMICS!WITH!THE!CHRISTIANS! 175!

I

NTRODUCTION

! 175!

6.1.

!

T

HE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

! 180!

6.1.1.

!

T

HE!

C

LAIMS!

M

ADE!BY!THE!

C

HRISTIANS!AGAINST!

M

USLIMS!AND!

I

SLAM

! 180!

6.1.2.

!

T

HE!

C

LAIMS!OF!THE!

A

UTHOR!AGAINST!THE!

C

HRISTIANS

! 182!

6.2.

!

R

ELIGIOUS!

A

UTHORITY!IN!THE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

! 185!

6.2.1.

!

T

HE!

A

UTHOR

S!

D

EFENCE!OF!

P

HILOSOPHY

! 185!

6.2.2.

!

T

HE!

O

BJECTIONS!OF!THE!

A

UTHOR!ON!THE!!

͑U

LAMĀ

’! 191!

A

)

!

S

CIENCE!AND!

Q

UR

ĀNIC!

I

NTERPRETATION

! 191!

B

)

!

P

HILOSOPHY!AND!

L

OGIC

! 192!

6.2.3.

!

T

HE!

U

SE!OF!

P

HILOSOPHY!IN!THE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

:

!

A

N!

E

XAMPLE

! 192!

6.3.

!

A

N!

E

THICAL

KC

ENTRED!

M

ODEL!FOR!

I

SLAM&IN&THE&

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

! 195!

6.4.

!

P

OLITICAL!

P

HILOSOPHY!IN!THE!

K

ITĀB!AL

KM

UJĀDALA

! 200!

A

)

!

T

HE!

P

OWERS!AND!

D

UTIES!OF!THE!

S

ULṬĀN

! 202!

B

)

!

T

HE!

L

IMITS!OF!THE!

A

UTHORITY!OF!THE!

S

ULṬĀN!AND!OF!THE!

C

HURCH

! 203!

C

ONCLUSIONS

! 207!

CHAPTER!SEVEN:!MUDEJAR!POLEMICS!AS!A!DISCURSIVE!TRADITION! 211!

I

NTRODUCTION

! 211!

7.1.

!

M

UDEJAR!

I

DENTITY!IN!

P

OLEMICS

! 212!

7.2.

!

R

ELIGIOUS!

L

EADERSHIP

! 217!

7.3.

!

N

OTIONS!OF!

‘M

INORITY

!AND!

G

OVERNMENT!AMONG!THE!

M

UDEJARS

! 219!

C

ONCLUSIONS

! 222!

CONCLUSIONS! 225!

(11)

SUMMARY! 231!

SAMENVATTING! 235!

MANUSCRIPT!DESCRIPTION!OF!THE!KITĀB!ALKMUJĀDALA!(MS!AF!58)! 239!

ANNEX! 245!

!

MS

!

BNE

!

4944,

!FF

.

!

1

R

K36

R

:

!

T

RANSCRIPTION!AND!

R

ENDERING!INTO!

M

ODERN!

S

PANISH

! 247!

!

MS

!

L

!

536,

!FF

.

!

123

V

K125

R

:

!

T

RANSCRIPTION!AND!

R

ENDERING!INTO!

M

ODERN!

S

PANI

! 325!

REFERENCES! 331!

INDEX!OF!NAMES!AND!PLACES! 379!

!

Referencias

Documento similar

In the previous sections we have shown how astronomical alignments and solar hierophanies – with a common interest in the solstices − were substantiated in the

Díaz Soto has raised the point about banning religious garb in the ―public space.‖ He states, ―for example, in most Spanish public Universities, there is a Catholic chapel

From the phenomenology associated with contexts (C.1), for the statement of task T 1.1 , the future teachers use their knowledge of situations of the personal

In the preparation of this report, the Venice Commission has relied on the comments of its rapporteurs; its recently adopted Report on Respect for Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule

The Dwellers in the Garden of Allah 109... The Dwellers in the Garden of Allah

Our results here also indicate that the orders of integration are higher than 1 but smaller than 2 and thus, the standard approach of taking first differences does not lead to

To contribute to the development of local community & enhancement of life quality in Gaza & Palestine5. To promote universal values & mutual cultural understanding

In the “big picture” perspective of the recent years that we have described in Brazil, Spain, Portugal and Puerto Rico there are some similarities and important differences,