• No se han encontrado resultados

Decoupling of electromagnetic perturbations

The highest boost weight components of the Maxwell (𝑝+ 1)βˆ’form field strength are denoted by a GHP scalar 𝝋 of boost weight 1 and spin 𝑝. In 4D (where 𝑝 = 1) the quantity analogous to𝝋satisfies a decoupled equation of motion in an algebraically spe- cial background. We shall investigate the conditions under which𝝋 satisfies a decoupled equation of motion in 𝑑 > 4 dimensions. The motivation for doing this is mainly that the Maxwell field illustrates the arguments that we shall also employ in the gravitational case, but the equations are considerably simpler. For this reason, we restrict to the simplest case𝑝= 1.

In this section, we show how, in a particular class of background Einstein spacetimes, we can construct decoupled 2nd order differential equations for a Maxwell test field. We show that this decoupling is possible if and only if the background spacetime is Kundt, that is it admits a geodesic null vector field that is not shearing, twisting or expanding.

In particular, we will show that the dynamics of a Maxwell test field on the back- ground of a Kundt spacetime can be described by the following equation:

(2ΓΎβ€²ΓΎ+k𝑗k𝑗+πœŒβ€²ΓΎβˆ’4πœπ‘—k𝑗 + Ξ¦βˆ’ 2π‘‘βˆ’3π‘‘βˆ’1 Ξ›)

πœ‘π‘–+(βˆ’2πœπ‘–k𝑗+2πœπ‘—k𝑖+2Ξ¦S𝑖𝑗+4Ξ¦A𝑖𝑗)πœ‘π‘— = 0. (4.4) We also show that analogous decoupled equations cannot be constructed for spacetimes that are not Kundt, and discuss briefly whether any alternative progress can be made.

It is interesting to compare this to the equation of motion for a massive scalar field Ψ:

(βˆ‡πœ‡βˆ‡πœ‡βˆ’πœ‡2)Ξ¨ = 0. (4.5)

When written out in GHP form in a general background, this equation is

(2ΓΎβ€²ΓΎ+k𝑖k𝑖+πœŒβ€²ΓΎβˆ’2πœπ‘–k𝑖+πœŒΓΎβ€²βˆ’πœ‡2)Ξ¨ = 0. (4.6) To compare this with the decoupled Maxwell equation, one must specialize to a Kundt spacetime, for which 𝜌= 0. Note thatπœπ‘–β€² does not appear in either equation.

4.3.1 Derivation of results

In the case of a 2-form field strengthπΉπœ‡πœˆ, the GHP Maxwell equations (2.76-2.79) reduce to:

kπ‘–πœ‘π‘–+þ𝑓 = πœπ‘–β€²πœ‘π‘–+πœŒπ‘–π‘—πΉπ‘–π‘— βˆ’πœŒπ‘“ βˆ’πœ…π‘–πœ‘β€²π‘– (4.7) 2k[π‘–πœ‘π‘—]βˆ’ΓΎπΉπ‘–π‘— = 2𝜏[π‘–β€²πœ‘π‘—]+ 2π‘“πœŒ[𝑖𝑗]+ 2𝐹[π‘–βˆ£π‘˜πœŒπ‘˜βˆ£π‘—]+ 2πœ…[π‘–πœ‘β€²π‘—] (4.8) 2ΓΎβ€²πœ‘π‘–+kπ‘—πΉπ‘—π‘–βˆ’k𝑖𝑓 = (2πœŒβ€²[𝑖𝑗]βˆ’πœŒβ€²π›Ώπ‘–π‘—)πœ‘π‘—βˆ’2πΉπ‘–π‘—πœπ‘—βˆ’2π‘“πœπ‘–+ (2𝜌(𝑖𝑗)βˆ’πœŒπ›Ώπ‘–π‘—)πœ‘β€²π‘— (4.9) k[π‘–πΉπ‘—π‘˜] = πœ‘[π‘–πœŒβ€²π‘—π‘˜]+πœ‘β€²[π‘–πœŒπ‘—π‘˜] (4.10)

4.3. DECOUPLING OF ELECTROMAGNETIC PERTURBATIONS 89 A further three equations can be obtained by priming equations (4.7),(4.8) and (4.9).

We will often make use of the combination 𝛿𝑖𝑗(4.7)βˆ’(4.8):

ΓΎ(𝐹𝑖𝑗 +𝛿𝑖𝑗𝑓) = 2k[π‘–πœ‘π‘—]βˆ’π›Ώπ‘–π‘—kπ‘˜πœ‘π‘˜βˆ’2𝜏[π‘–β€²πœ‘π‘—]βˆ’2π‘“πœŒ[𝑖𝑗]βˆ’2𝐹[π‘–βˆ£π‘˜πœŒπ‘˜βˆ£π‘—]βˆ’2πœ…[π‘–πœ‘β€²π‘—]

+𝛿𝑖𝑗(πœπ‘˜β€²πœ‘π‘˜+πœŒπ‘˜π‘™πΉπ‘˜π‘™βˆ’πœŒπ‘“ βˆ’πœ…π‘˜πœ‘β€²π‘˜) (4.11) Now consider the combinationΓΎ(4.9) +k𝑗(4.11). This gives

0 = (2ΓΎβ€²ΓΎ+k𝑗k𝑗)πœ‘π‘–+ 2[ΓΎ,ΓΎβ€²]πœ‘π‘–βˆ’[ΓΎ,k𝑗](𝐹𝑖𝑗 +𝑓𝛿𝑖𝑗) + [k𝑖,k𝑗]πœ‘π‘—

+ΓΎ(

βˆ’(2πœŒβ€²[𝑖𝑗]βˆ’πœŒβ€²π›Ώπ‘–π‘—)πœ‘π‘— + 2(𝐹𝑖𝑗+𝑓𝛿𝑖𝑗)πœπ‘—βˆ’(2𝜌(𝑖𝑗)βˆ’πœŒπ›Ώπ‘–π‘—)πœ‘β€²π‘—)

(4.12) +k𝑖(

βˆ’πœŒπ‘—π‘˜πΉπ‘—π‘˜+πœŒπ‘“βˆ’πœπ‘—β€²πœ‘π‘— +πœ…π‘—πœ‘β€²π‘—) +k𝑗(

2𝜏[π‘–β€²πœ‘π‘—]+ 2π‘“πœŒ[𝑖𝑗]+ 2𝐹[π‘–βˆ£π‘˜πœŒπ‘˜βˆ£π‘—]+ 2πœ…[π‘–πœ‘β€²π‘—]) . This involves second derivatives of 𝝋, as well as of the boost weight 0 quantities𝐹𝑖𝑗

and 𝑓. However, the latter occur in the form of a commutator [ΓΎ,k𝑗](𝐹𝑖𝑗 +𝑓𝛿𝑖𝑗) and can therefore be eliminated using (C2). Now we consider first derivatives of Maxwell components other than 𝝋. We need to eliminate these from the equation if it is to decouple.

First consider terms involving ΓΎ:

βˆ™ ΓΎ acts on 𝑓 and 𝐹𝑖𝑗 through the combination ΓΎ(𝐹𝑖𝑗 +𝑓𝛿𝑖𝑗), which we eliminate using equation (4.11).

βˆ™ Terms involving ΓΎπœ‘β€²π‘– are eliminated using equation (4.9)β€².

βˆ™ Terms in which ΓΎ acts on 𝝆, 𝝉 and 𝝆′ are eliminated using the Newman-Penrose equations (NP1), (NP2) and (NP4)β€² respectively.

The resulting equation is very long:

[(2ΓΎΓΎβ€²+k𝑗k𝑗+πœŒβ€²ΓΎ+πœŒΓΎβ€²βˆ’2πœπ‘—β€²kπ‘—βˆ’2πœπ‘—k𝑗)πœ‘π‘–

+ (βˆ’πœŒβ€²π‘–π‘—ΓΎβˆ’2πœπ‘–k𝑗+πœŒβ€²π‘—π‘–ΓΎβˆ’πœŒπ‘–π‘—ΓΎβ€² + [k𝑖,k𝑗] + 2πœπ‘—kπ‘–βˆ’πœŒπ‘—π‘–ΓΎβ€²)πœ‘π‘—

βˆ’πœ…π‘–πœ…β€²π‘—πœ‘π‘—βˆ’2πœ‘π‘—πœŒπ‘˜π‘–πœŒβ€²π‘—π‘˜ +πœ‘π‘—πœŒπ‘˜π‘—πœŒβ€²π‘–π‘˜βˆ’2πœ‘π‘—πœπ‘—πœπ‘–β€²+ 2πœ‘π‘–πœπ‘—πœπ‘—β€²βˆ’πœ‘π‘—πœŒπ‘–π‘˜πœŒβ€²π‘—π‘˜ +πœ‘π‘—πœŒπœŒβ€²π‘—π‘– + 2πœ‘π‘—πœπ‘–πœπ‘—β€²+πœ…π‘—πœ…β€²π‘–πœ‘π‘— βˆ’πœ…π‘—πœ…β€²π‘—πœ‘π‘– βˆ’πœ‘π‘–πœŒπ‘˜π‘—πœŒβ€²π‘—π‘˜βˆ’2Ξ¦Aπ‘–π‘—πœ‘π‘—βˆ’Ξ¦πœ‘π‘–βˆ’π‘‘βˆ’2π‘‘βˆ’1Ξ›πœ‘π‘–

] +[

πœ…π‘—ΓΎβ€²(𝐹𝑖𝑗 +𝑓𝛿𝑖𝑗) +πœŒπ‘—π‘–kπ‘—π‘“βˆ’πœŒπ‘˜π‘–kπ‘—πΉπ‘—π‘˜ + 2πœŒπ‘–π‘—k𝑗𝑓+πœŒπ‘˜π‘—kπ‘—πΉπ‘–π‘˜βˆ’πœŒπ‘—π‘˜kπ‘–πΉπ‘—π‘˜ +πœŒπ‘—π‘˜kπ‘—πΉπ‘–π‘˜

βˆ’π‘“kπ‘—πœŒπ‘—π‘–βˆ’πΉπ‘—π‘˜kπ‘—πœŒπ‘˜π‘–+𝑓kπ‘—πœŒπ‘–π‘— +𝐹𝑖𝑗kπ‘˜πœŒπ‘—π‘˜+𝑓kπ‘–πœŒβˆ’πΉπ‘—π‘˜kπ‘–πœŒπ‘—π‘˜ + 2π‘“ΓΎβ€²πœ…π‘–+ 2πΉπ‘–π‘—ΓΎβ€²πœ…π‘—

βˆ’5π‘“πœŒπ‘–π‘—πœπ‘— βˆ’2π‘“Ξ¨π‘–βˆ’4πΉπ‘–π‘—πœŒπ‘—π‘˜πœπ‘˜βˆ’πΉπ‘–π‘—Ξ¨π‘— βˆ’πΉπ‘—π‘˜πœ…π‘–πœŒβ€²π‘—π‘˜ +πΉπ‘—π‘˜πœ…π‘—πœŒβ€²π‘–π‘˜βˆ’πΉπ‘—π‘˜Ξ¨π‘—π‘˜π‘–βˆ’πΉπ‘–π‘—πœ…π‘˜πœŒβ€²π‘—π‘˜ +πΉπ‘–π‘—πœ…π‘—πœŒβ€² +π‘“πœŒπ‘—π‘–πœπ‘— βˆ’3πΉπ‘—π‘˜πœŒπ‘—π‘–πœπ‘˜βˆ’π‘“πœŒπœπ‘–+ 2πΉπ‘—π‘˜πœŒπ‘—π‘˜πœπ‘–βˆ’πΉπ‘—π‘˜πœŒπ‘–π‘—πœπ‘˜+πΉπ‘–π‘—πœŒπœπ‘—]

+[

πœ…π‘—kπ‘–πœ‘β€²π‘— +πœ…π‘–kπ‘—πœ‘β€²π‘—βˆ’πœ…π‘—kπ‘—πœ‘β€²π‘–+ 2πœŒπ‘˜π‘–πœŒπ‘—π‘˜πœ‘β€²π‘—+πœ…π‘—πœπ‘—πœ‘β€²π‘–+πœŒπ‘–π‘˜πœŒπ‘˜π‘—πœ‘β€²π‘— +πœ‘β€²π‘—πœŒπ‘–π‘˜πœŒπ‘—π‘˜βˆ’πœ…π‘—πœπ‘–πœ‘β€²π‘— βˆ’πœ…π‘–πœπ‘—πœ‘β€²π‘— βˆ’πœŒπ‘—π‘–πœŒπœ‘β€²π‘— βˆ’πœŒπ‘—π‘˜πœŒπ‘˜π‘—πœ‘β€²π‘–+ 2Ξ©π‘–π‘—πœ‘β€²π‘—]

= 0 (4.13)

The only terms above involving derivatives of Maxwell components other than 𝝋 are of the (schematic) formπœΏΓΎβ€²F,πœΏΓΎβ€²π‘“ 𝜿k𝝋′,𝝆kF and 𝝆k𝑓. We need to eliminate all of these from our equations if we are to obtain a decoupled equation for 𝝋. Consider the first three, which are

πœ…π‘—ΓΎβ€²(𝐹𝑖𝑗 +𝑓𝛿𝑖𝑗) + 2πœ…π‘—k[π‘–πœ‘β€²π‘—]+πœ…π‘–kπ‘—πœ‘β€²π‘— = 2πœ…π‘—ΓΎβ€²(𝐹𝑖𝑗 +𝑓𝛿𝑖𝑗) +. . . (4.14) where we have used (4.11)β€² to eliminate the 𝜿k𝝋′ terms in favour of πœΏΓΎβ€²F, πœΏΓΎβ€²π‘“ and some other terms not involving derivatives.

Now, the Maxwell equations cannot be used to eliminate the terms of the form πœΏΓΎβ€²(F+𝑓) without re-introducing 1-derivative terms of the form 𝜿k𝝋′. Hence the only way in which theπœΏΓΎβ€²(F+𝑓) terms can be eliminated is if𝜿=0, and therefore the vector field β„“ must be geodesic for decoupling to be possible. We assume henceforth that this is the case.

Now examine the 𝝆kFand 𝝆k𝑓 terms above. These are:

πœŒπ‘—π‘–k𝑗𝑓 βˆ’πœŒπ‘˜π‘–kπ‘—πΉπ‘—π‘˜+ 2πœŒπ‘–π‘—k𝑗𝑓 +πœŒπ‘˜π‘—kπ‘—πΉπ‘–π‘˜βˆ’πœŒπ‘—π‘˜kπ‘–πΉπ‘—π‘˜+πœŒπ‘—π‘˜kπ‘—πΉπ‘–π‘˜ (4.15) To achieve decoupling, we need to eliminate these terms from the equation without introducing any 1-derivative terms (unless the derivative acts on 𝝋). It is convenient to decomposekπ‘–πΉπ‘—π‘˜ into parts that transform irreducibly under 𝑆𝑂(π‘‘βˆ’2):

kπ‘–πΉπ‘—π‘˜ =β„±π‘–π‘—π‘˜+ 2

π‘‘βˆ’3𝛿𝑖[𝑗kβˆ£π‘™πΉπ‘™βˆ£π‘˜], (4.16) where β„±π‘–π‘—π‘˜ is traceless and can be decomposed further into objects transforming irre- ducibly according to the Young tableaux and . The quantity k𝑖𝑓 transforms in the same way ask𝑗𝐹𝑗𝑖, i.e. as a vector ( ) under 𝑆𝑂(π‘‘βˆ’2). The latter can be eliminated in favour of the former using equation (4.9), which givesk𝑗𝐹𝑗𝑖 =k𝑖𝑓+. . ., where the ellipsis denotes terms in which derivatives act only on𝝋. The contribution of the β€˜vector’ terms to (4.15) is then

2

π‘‘βˆ’3(πœŒπ‘—π‘–+ (π‘‘βˆ’3)πœŒπ‘–π‘— βˆ’πœŒπ›Ώπ‘–π‘—)k𝑗𝑓 (4.17) We can substitute our decomposition of k𝐹 into the Maxwell equations. There are no Maxwell equations that can be used to eliminate k𝑖𝑓 without reintroducing new derivative terms of the form 𝝆þ𝝋′. Hence the only way in which the Maxwell equation will decouple is if the expression in brackets in (4.17) vanishes. The symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the resulting equation give

πœŽπ‘–π‘— = 0 = (π‘‘βˆ’4)πœ”π‘–π‘—, (4.18)

where𝝈 and 𝝎are the shear and rotation of β„“respectively. Hence a necessary condition for decoupling is thatβ„“ be shearfree and, for𝑑 >4, rotation free (and hence hypersurface

4.3. DECOUPLING OF ELECTROMAGNETIC PERTURBATIONS 91 orthogonal sinceβ„“ is geodesic). We now assume 𝑑 >4, so we set𝝈 =𝝎 =0 henceforth, and therefore have

πœŒπ‘–π‘— = 𝜌

π‘‘βˆ’2𝛿𝑖𝑗. (4.19)

A spacetime admitting a null geodesic congruence with vanishing rotation and shear is called a Robinson-Trautman spacetime ifπœŒβˆ•= 0 and a Kundt spacetime if𝜌= 0. We saw in Chapter 3that an Einstein spacetime of either of these types is algebraically special, with the vector field β„“ aligned with the congruence being a multiple WAND. Therefore we can take Ξ©=0=Ξ¨. Note that (NP3) now implies kπ‘–πœŒ= 0.

It is now guaranteed that we can use equation (4.9) to eliminate β€˜vector’ terms of the formk𝑗𝐹𝑖𝑗 ork𝑖𝑓 from (4.13). Upon doing so, we find that the terms involving β„±π‘–π‘—π‘˜

all drop out. The commutators [ΓΎ,ΓΎβ€²] and [k𝑖,k𝑗] can be used to tidy up the equation, giving

0 = [

2ΓΎβ€²ΓΎ+k𝑗k𝑗 +πœŒβ€²ΓΎ+𝑑+2π‘‘βˆ’2πœŒΓΎβ€²βˆ’4πœπ‘—k𝑗]

πœ‘π‘–+ 2(πœπ‘—kπ‘–βˆ’πœπ‘–k𝑗)πœ‘π‘— +

[

3Φ𝑖𝑗 βˆ’Ξ¦π‘—π‘–βˆ’ 2𝜌

π‘‘βˆ’2πœŒβ€²[𝑖𝑗]+ (

Ξ¦ + πœŒπœŒβ€²

π‘‘βˆ’2 βˆ’2π‘‘βˆ’3 π‘‘βˆ’1 Ξ›

) 𝛿𝑖𝑗

] πœ‘π‘—

+π‘‘βˆ’4 π‘‘βˆ’2𝜌

[

πœπ‘—(𝐹𝑖𝑗 βˆ’πΉ 𝛿𝑖𝑗) + 𝜌 π‘‘βˆ’2πœ‘β€²π‘–

]

. (4.20) The only term involving𝝋′ is the final one, so for𝝋′ to decouple we need (π‘‘βˆ’4)𝜌= 0.

This also ensures that the terms involving 𝐹𝑖𝑗 and 𝑓 drop out of the equation. Hence decoupling requires 𝜌 = 0 (since 𝑑 > 4), which implies πœŒπ‘–π‘— = 0, so β„“ must be free of expansion as well as shear and rotation. That is, the spacetime must be Kundt. The equation reduces to

[2ΓΎβ€²ΓΎ+k𝑗k𝑗 +πœŒβ€²ΓΎβˆ’4πœπ‘—k𝑗 + Ξ¦βˆ’ 2π‘‘βˆ’3π‘‘βˆ’1 Ξ›]

πœ‘π‘– + (2πœπ‘—k𝑖 βˆ’2πœπ‘–k𝑗 + 3Φ𝑖𝑗 βˆ’ Φ𝑗𝑖)πœ‘π‘— = 0.

(4.21) which is equivalent to (4.4).

To summarize, for 𝑑 > 4, 𝝋 satisfies a second-order decoupled equation if, and only if, β„“ is geodesic with vanishing expansion, rotation and shear. The existence of such a choice of β„“ implies, by definition, that the spacetime is Kundt.

Note the presence of factors of (𝑑 βˆ’4) in several of our equations above. When 𝑑= 4, it is not necessary for the rotation 𝝎 of β„“ to vanish in equation (4.18), or for the expansion 𝜌 to vanish in equation (4.20). Indeed, in 4D, all that is required is that β„“ be geodesic and shearfree, which is equivalent (by the Goldberg-Sachs theorem) to the spacetime being algebraically special.

It is clear that 𝝋′ will satisfy a second-order decoupled equation (the prime of the above equation) if, and only if, 𝑛 is geodesic with vanishing expansion, rotation and

shear. Hence 𝝋 and 𝝋′ will both satisfy second order decoupled equations if, and only if, 𝜿 = πœΏβ€² = 𝝆 = 𝝆′ = 0. A natural name for a spacetime admitting such null vector fields seems to be:

Definition 4.2 A spacetime is doubly Kundt if and only if it admits a pair of non- expanding, non-shearing, non-twisting geodesic null vector fields β„“ and 𝑛 with β„“.π‘›βˆ•= 0.

4.3.2 The Schwarzchild Solution

Consider the special case of the higher-dimensional Schwarzschild solution, which is not Kundt. This solution has 𝝆 = π‘‘βˆ’2𝜌 1 and 𝝉 =0 (a consequence of spherical symmetry).

The latter implies that the terms inFand𝑓 drop out of equation (4.20), leaving us with an equation of the form

(β–‘πœ‘)𝑖+ (π‘‘βˆ’4)

(π‘‘βˆ’2)2𝜌2πœ‘β€²π‘– = 0, (4.22) whereβ–‘is a second order differential operator. The second term remains an obstruction to decoupling. For the Schwarzschild solution, the two multiple WANDs have identical properties so we can take the prime of the equation to obtain

(β–‘β€²πœ‘β€²)𝑖+ (π‘‘βˆ’4)

(π‘‘βˆ’2)2πœŒβ€²2πœ‘π‘– = 0, (4.23)

and hence [

β–‘β€² ( 1

𝜌2β–‘πœ‘ )]

π‘–βˆ’ (π‘‘βˆ’4)2

(π‘‘βˆ’2)4πœŒβ€²2πœ‘π‘– = 0. (4.24) So in fact𝝋does satisfy a decoupled equation but it is fourth order in derivatives. Note that we had to make use of several special properties of the Schwarzschild solution to obtain this result. It would be interesting to investigate more generally the circumstances under which one can obtain a decoupled equation of higher order for𝝋.