otras formas de delincuencia organizada
A/CONF.213/18 comunitarios de bienestar social a fin de garantizar un apoyo integral a los
You tell an interesting tale here but I’m afraid my research has revealed some gaps in your story. You’ve taken a hole-‐punch to the truth. You call this ‘non-‐fiction’ but there are omissions and exaggerations. Shall we begin with your trip to Europe in 1987? You described it as ‘six months of solo backpacking’ but that’s not strictly accurate, is it?
(Blushes) You’re right. I have left something out. Maybe I wanted everyone to think I was braver than I was. Too embarrassed to admit that I needed a buffer for my fears. For the first month of that trip I was actually with Margot, staying in a university town in northern Italy where she was working. Rehearsing my Italian phrases. Gathering my courage. Sitting alone in cafes in the town square drinking too much coffee and eating too much everything. Hovering at the back of a crowded room in a thirteenth century building as a bunch of Italian university students planned an anti-‐nuclear campaign. Wanting to be part of it but unable to join in. Missing Andre. Practising for being lonely. But when I sat down to write about my memories of that trip, that’s not the stuff I remembered. I remembered what happened when I was travelling alone. When I was missing a layer of skin. If those memories are true, then the rest of that story was true.
There’s another omission here. Why did you stop working in radio? You told us how much you loved being a presenter, and then later you told us all about the print articles you were writing, but what happened in between? Why did a radio host suddenly become a
newspaper columnist?
(Pauses) I got sacked. They don’t call it that, they call it a ‘non-‐renewal of contract’, but effectively you’ve been sacked. I still don’t know why. The reason I was given was that my program wasn’t attracting high enough ratings. The boss had just been reassuring me that as long as they were climbing steadily (and they were) my position was safe. Then
suddenly he changed his mind and I was out. Some of my friends favoured a conspiracy theory: too many strong opinions on too many awkward topics, too openly expressed. Trying too hard to be helpful, maybe. Personally I doubt it. But perhaps the reason I didn’t mention it earlier was because, deep down, I’ve always wondered if someone ‘upstairs’ at the radio station could hear my whispering what ifs. Maybe someone saw through the ‘illusion of competence’ and decided that Shy Sian couldn’t carry it off. Losing that job was the biggest rejection I had ever encountered. It nearly sank me. It certainly helped to sink the relationship I was in at the time. I was in love with radio and radio no longer wanted
me. It was my first, maybe my only, rehearsal for dealing with Tom’s rejection. One minute you’re in favour, the next minute you’re not. Inexplicable.
I’m sorry to have taken you back to such a painful episode in your past. Here, have a glass of water. Do you need a little break? No? Great, then we’ll continue. Now you implied that Tom’s rejection came as a complete shock to you but surely there must have been signs before that night? You had recently been overseas together having a holiday by the sea. What happened on that trip?
(Pauses again, longer this time) There was a small earthquake. I was in the shower. Open-‐ air shower. Frangipani flowers hanging above my head. Feet covered with shampoo suds. Cold tap on for the sunburn. The door of the bathroom was open and I could see, through the bedroom window, dozens of tiny fishing boats skimming across the sea, on their way home. I wanted to be on one of them. When I came out of the bathroom Tom was lying on the bed reading. His feet looked so beautiful there on the white sheets. He said, ‘I wonder if we should be worried.’
‘About what?’ I replied. ‘About the earthquake.. ‘What earthquake?’ I said. ‘The one that just happened!’
But I hadn’t felt it. I had no idea. If he could feel it, why hadn’t I felt it?
I see what you’re doing there. Not exactly an original metaphor but I get what you’re trying to say. I’m not convinced, though. No tremors even, on that trip? Would you mind if I asked you to consult the records in your private journal for this one?
I’m sorry but I don’t have to do everything you tell me to do. I don’t want to consult that journal. I’m not ready. I do want to talk about fiction and non-‐fiction, though. Tom mostly wrote fiction. That’s what he claimed, that his songs were not true stories but made-‐up stories about made-‐up characters. But I assumed what he said to me about us was fact. And when someone you love tells you something as fact, you have to believe them, don’t you? Because once you stop believing them the whole thing can unravel. So when he wrote a song about a guy who was planning to fuck dozens of women once he’d broken up with his girlfriend and had stopped seeing her image in his mirror, I had to believe him when he said it was fiction. Tom knew how frightening it was for me when he showed me those songs. Maybe part of me wondered if it was predictive non-‐fiction. But what should I have
done? Checked his phone messages? Spied on his emails? Asked his friends if he was lying to me? I would have gone mad. He had told me he was true to me. ‘You make monogamy a good place to be.’ I just had to keep treading water and hoping the fear would pass. I was so used to condemning my own anxieties as irrational, so used to being ashamed of my fears, maybe I didn’t allow myself to listen to them. I still don’t know if I was a loyal lover or a naïve fool. Probably both.
What about that party you described for us at the very beginning of this whole saga, the one where you had a panic attack and drove home without saying goodbye to anyone. You told us you couldn’t find Tom in the crowd. You weren’t even sure if he was still there. You were so caught up with trying to get to the bottom of this shyness thing, you never
stopped to ask yourself – where was he that night? Why were you alone? And if, as you imply, you thought Tom was the ‘solution’ to your shyness, why were you having a panic attack at a party you were meant to be attending with him?
That’s a triple-‐barrelled question, you realise. Bad interview technique. You should brush up. Journalism 101. Your interviewee never knows which question you want them to answer. I’m afraid my answer to all three questions is the same. I don’t know. Maybe Tom was avoiding me already. On the look-‐out for someone else. Already with someone else. Maybe my dread that night wasn’t about the strangers at the party after all, but about Tom. Sometimes an adult’s anxiety can be prescient rather than neurotic. Wouldn’t that be ironic? I start writing a book about social anxiety because of a panic attack that was actually caused by the imminent end of a love affair. Serious mis-‐self-‐diagnosis. That’s what happens when you let amateurs try and do the work of professionals.
There’s another omission I need to ask you about. You tell us Tom is famous, so everyone is probably wondering who he is, but you don’t tell us his real name. Why so coy?
Because if you write a story that happens to have a famous person in it, everyone thinks you’ve written a story about a famous person. This isn’t a story about Tom. This is a story about you and I and about shyness. Anyone can find out who Tom is if they want to, but I’m hoping they’ll read the book first and realise that although every famous person is different, fame itself doesn’t change much. It always attracts the same kind of prurient and obsessive behaviour. It always draws attention towards itself and away from everything else. It makes potentially more interesting things fade into invisibility. And fame makes
the famous feel like gods. Perhaps it’s inevitable. All that relentless positive reinforcement. It’s toxic.
Let’s move on to the topic of drugs. No doubt some readers will have noticed that the two men you’ve fallen for hardest, Andre and Tom, both had drug issues. Do you see a pattern there? Something about your helpfulness?
I didn’t know they were using drugs when I fell in love with them. Call me naïve, but it took me ages to figure out what was going on, in both cases. I didn’t set out to rescue them. But maybe there was something about their shameful secrets that drew me closer to them. Like Stan Prior’s magnets. Centripetal and centrifugal forces. Shame seeks out shame, anxiety seeks out anxiety. I certainly thought, for a while at least, that I could rescue Andre. I don’t think I ever imagined Tom needed rescuing.
Did you think he could rescue you?
What do you mean?
You said that you were in a well and he sent down a rope ladder. Had you been waiting all along for some handsome prince to rescue you from your shyness? And if so, how does that fit with your views about women and the disempowering effect of the Male Gaze? It’s Feminism 101, surely, that women don’t need the prince’s kiss to deliver them agency?
Touché. No flies on you.
And speaking of rescuing, I can’t help wondering what impact the manner of your father’s death might have on all this. The man who died rescuing people. Other people, not you. The hero who disappeared from view. The unreachable, unattainable male.
Didn’t I tell you that I was an amateur with this stuff? Which I guess makes you one too. You’re just better at bluffing. I don’t know why, after all those years of being relatively disinterested in him, now just thinking about Glen turns me to liquid. Maybe I’ve been hanging around on surf beaches my whole life waiting for him to reappear. Waiting for a cold wet hug from a guy who was never loose enough to let it swing. Waiting for someone who knew me because I was just like him. Someone who loved me because he had to, because it was biologically predetermined, like our shyness.
But you didn’t wait for rescue from your shyness, did you? You’ve had yourself on an intermittent program of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for decades, trying to eradicate these fears. Lists, immersions, professional personas, helpfulness, exposure therapy, counsellors, you’ve tried all sorts of strategies. Your faith in CBT is quite touching. Cherchez la mere, again. And after the break-‐up you pushed yourself even harder, didn’t you? Approached new friends. Got yourself back on the radio. Even writing this book could be seen as a form of self-‐prescribed extreme exposure therapy. Tell everyone everything about yourself and risk their negative evaluation. Madness.
I haven’t told them everything. That would be extremely tedious.
Were you hoping that Tom might provide you with a permanent shortcut out of your shyness?
I usually felt less shy when I was with him. Something about being bathed in his positive regard. Tom is a man who once said to me ‘I like who I am when I’m with you’. Maybe, like you and I, there were always several different versions of him and one of them was always going to leave me. While Tom and I were emailing each other during those first six
months, I constructed a version of him based on what he wrote to me and what I’d read of his published writing, a version that fitted what Shy Sian needed. I thought what we had was romantic love. I thought we were a poem. In the end, though, we were just a string of platitudes.
(Silence)
The other day I heard an anthropologist on the radio saying that what we call romantic love is nothing more than a ‘longing for association’. The social scientists always strip the poetry away, don’t they? Maybe that’s why I never wanted to be a psychologist. If they’re right about that, you could say that I longed for someone like Tom so I imagined him into being. He was always a fantasy figure. So often silent. So often absent. If we’re going to continue this amateur psychologising, I’d say that I projected onto him a whole lot of qualities he never had. Filled in the gaps with whatever suited me. And there’s something more I need to say about love. You’re not going to like this. It will make you squirm. The object of my love may have been imaginary but the love was real. It was the strongest
thing I’d ever felt, stronger than my shyness. No wonder I didn’t want to let it go. It was just misdirected.
(Not squirming but sceptical) How can you be in love with someone for ten years who was only ever ‘imaginary’, as you put it?
Because any evidence that didn’t fit my fantasy was immediately dismissed. The version of Tom that I fell in love with had been crafted in text long before the first time we kissed. But our textual versions of ourselves can only ever be partial versions of ourselves – personas – just like you and me. And everything that happened after we met, I sculpted and reshaped to fit the imaginary version. When Tom was cool or dismissive with me, when he flirted with other women in my presence, when he lied to me about fucking those other women, I edited out the evidence that didn’t fit with my fantasy. Because that perfect, imaginary version of him was my safety zone, the place where I believed I was accepted and loved for who I was, in spite of this shy disfigurement. You remember how sometimes I confided in Margot about how difficult I found it dealing with Tom’s frequent long absences, and with the way he always put work before everything else? And how she once told me ‘He’s just like your father, Glen’s work always came first, it’s a kind of deep selfishness’. I didn’t want to hear those words. I edited them out too. I didn’t want anything to topple the giant heroic statues I had made of both those men. But I never really knew Tom. I imagined a depth of intimacy that didn’t exist, a strength of loyalty that was never there, a level of respect that was impossible. Margot knew Tom would leave me. She had even saved up some money to help me out when (not if) it happened. There’s no way she could have warned me, though, is there?
No way at all. But she’s pretty smart, our mother. Interesting, how you used the word ‘disfigurement’ back there to describe your shyness. There’s a psychological condition I’ve been reading about called ‘body identity integrity disorder’. People with this condition sometimes try to hack off one of their own perfectly normal, functioning limbs because they are convinced that limb doesn’t belong to them. They believe it’s an interloper and quite possibly dangerous to them. Perhaps shyness has been for you like one of those unwanted limbs. It’s a perfectly normal, natural part of your identity that you’ve been unable to acknowledge belongs to you, and you’ve been trying to remove it for decades.
That’s a good theory.
So maybe you can give that up now, that self-‐mutilation thing? And while you’re at it, you could also give up that looking-‐for-‐a-‐shortcut thing with dangerous imaginary men. Sorry, I don’t mean to turn this into a counselling session, but ever since I can remember you’ve been sandwiched between these two fears – fear of people and fear of loneliness. Leave me alone, don’t leave me. Maybe you can stop waiting to be rescued and try a bit of solitude for a change. It won’t kill you, you know.
I overheard a conversation on a train recently. There was a woman sitting in front of me talking to her friend on a mobile – practically everyone on that train was doing something with their phones – and at one point she said to him ‘So what is your strategy for feeling safe with other people?’ It sounded like a good question to me. I wrote it down in my phone. Then I thought about it some more. Maybe what we need is not just a strategy for how to feel safe with other people, but for how to feel safe without other people. We’re so afraid of loneliness. Sometimes the fantasy of romantic love can offer us respite, or a voice on the radio. But it’s always there, waiting for us, looking back at us from the mirror when all we can see is a reflection of ourselves, alone.
I have one last question for you. Why are you so down on helpfulness? Maybe it’s not such a bad thing, in spite of your hostility towards poor little Beth March.
I do like to help. It’s nature and nurture. It’s in the genes and it’s been modelled for me by most of my elders, just like shyness. And it’s too late, isn’t it? I can’t get rid of either of them. Shyness belongs to me; I am affiliated with it. And I’m still a compulsive improver.
That old list of ours, Things Wrong With The World, hasn’t exactly shrunk in the last couple of decades. The world could still do with some improvement. In spite of your reservations, maybe this could be a self-‐help book after all, for other shy people. But you and I could give ourselves a break now and put that helpfulness energy elsewhere instead of focussing it on ourselves. I’m a bit sick of us. In fact, here’s an idea. Maybe we could stop thinking of ourselves as two separate personas, at least one of who is in constant need of improvement, and get together. You and I could just be me.
Or me. Sure. It’s worth a try. (Pause) You remember our grandmother Peg on the tandem bicycle with her octogenarian boyfriend?
So. (Pause) You know we’ll probably do it again, don’t you?
What?
That longing for association thing.