6. PRINCIPIO DE INTERÉS SUPERIOR DEL NIÑO EN LOS PROCESOS DE FILIACIÓN.
6.5. Fundamento jurídico del principio de interés superior del niño
It is unlikely that an industry sponsored trial will be conducted to compare belimumab with rituximab or other new biological interventions for SLE. The cost of a sufficiently powered study to discriminate between such treatments is likely to be too great for such studies to be undertaken independently of industry sponsorship. In view of the relative expense of belimumab and the lack of clear demonstration of a dose response relationship it is possible that in the real world belimumab may be employed at doses less than 10mg/kg. Useful research could be undertaken to monitor such usage and the 24 week response rates elicited.
Due to the paucity of long-term evidence for the continued benefit of belimumab and its safety, monitoring and surveillance of patients who have been treated with belimumab are therefore necessary. Further investigation is needed in patients excluded in the current BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 trials who had severe lupus nephritis or central nervous system manifestations of the disease. The two trials were limited in the inclusions of black patients, who for example account for approximately 25% of lupus patients in the USA. These patients also tend to have more severe disease than the general lupus population. In an earlier Phase II study of belimumab, black patients did significantly better than non-black patients. In contrast the reported Phase III trials found black patients treated with belimumab performed worse than those given placebo. These discrepancies needed to be considered further.
146
Although BLyS (B-Lymphocyte stimulator) is raised in SLE, reducing its activity with belimumab in SLE patients appears to have only a very modest effect. In RCTs a large proportion of patients in the belimumab group responded, but the placebo group response indicated that many would have responded irrespective of receiving belimumab. In a Targeted population with higher response rates the effect of belimumab remained relatively modest. On this basis, research should be directed at identifying additional factors that independently, or together with BLyS play a role in the pathology of SLE. Until such factors are identified it is probable that the traditional armamentarium of interventions will remain core for the treatment of most SLE patients.
147
7
REFERENCE LIST
1. ACR Ad Hoc Committee on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Response Criteria. The American College of Rheumatology response criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials: Measures of overall disease activity. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2004;50:3418-26.
2. Isenberg DA, Gordon C. From BILAG to BLIPS--disease activity assessment in lupus past, present and future. Lupus 2000;9:651-4.
3. U.S.Food and Drugs Administration. FDA briefing package. 2010. URL:
4. Cella D, Yount S, Sorensen M, Chartash E, Sengupta N, Grober J. Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2005;32:811-9.
5. U.S.Food and Drugs Administration. Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting Briefing Document for the 16 November 2010 Meeting: Belimumab: BENLYSTA® (belimumab): Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: BLA 125370. 13/10/2010. URL:
6. Wallace DJ, Stohl W, Furie RA, Lisse JR, McKay JD, Merrill JT et al. A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2009;61:1168-78.
7. Navarra SV, Guzman RM, Gallacher AE, Hall S, Levy RA, Jimenez RE et al. Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011;377:721- 31.
8. van Dis I, Kromhout D, Geleijnse JM, Boer JM, Verschuren WM. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk predicted by different SCORE equations: the Netherlands as an example. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010;17:244-9.
9. Swaak AJ, van den Brink HG, Smeenk RJ, Manger K, Kalden JR, Tosi S et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical features in patients with a disease duration of over 10 years, first evaluation. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999;38:953-8.
10. Merrill, J. T., Neuwelt, C. M., Wallace, D. J., Shanahan, J. C., Latinis, K. M., Oates, J. C., Utset, T. O., Gordon, C., Isenberg, D. A., Hsieh, H. J., Zhang, D, and Brunetta, P. G. Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the randomized, double-blind phase II/III study EXPLORER. Conference: 72nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. Abstract L12. 2008. 2008 Oct 24;
11. Gordon C, Merrill JT, Wallace DJ, Hsieh H, Brunetta P. BILAG versus SELENA- SLEDAI scoring in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in EXPLORER. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2009;60:281.
148
12. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. Search Filters. 21/04/2011. URL:
13. Wallace DJ, Stohl W, Furie RA, Lisse JR, McKay JD, Merrill JT et al. A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2009;61:1168-78.
14. Navarra SV, Guzman RM, Gallacher AE, Hall S, Levy RA, Jimenez RE et al. Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011;377:721- 31.
15. Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Kagal A, Hallett D. Accurately describing changes in disease activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2000;27:377-9.
16. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. NHS Economics Evaluation Database
Handbook. 2007. URL:
27 June 2011).
17. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35:1095- 108.
18. Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2005-06. 07/12/2006. URL:
2011).
19. Bernatsky S, Boivin JF, Joseph L, Manzi S, Ginzler E, Gladman DD et al. Mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2006;54:2550-7.
20. Buyon JP, Petri MA, Kim MY, Kalunian KC, Grossman J, Hahn BH et al. The effect of combined estrogen and progesterone hormone replacement therapy on disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:953-62.
21. Petri M, Buyon J, Kim M. Classification and definition of major flares in SLE clinical trials. Lupus 1999;8:685-91.
22. Petri M, Kim MY, Kalunian KC, Grossman J, Hahn BH, Sammaritano LR et al. Combined oral contraceptives in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2550-8.
149