Teorías psicosociales que explican conductas alimentarias

The Hazards & Effects Management Process (HEMP) provides a structured approach to managing foreseeable HSE hazards, such that their risks are both tolerable and As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP).

3.4.2.1 Identification of Hazards and Effects

The Agip KCO Hazards and Effects Management Processes (HEMP) identifies and assess HSE hazards, implements control and recovery measures, and maintain a documented demonstration that major HSE risks have been reduced to a level that is As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP).

The Operations Director is responsible for ensuring compliance with Policy, Procedures and Standard. The Operations Director, D-Island OIM, Drilling Rig Supervisor and line management ensure that procedures that are in place are applied to activities carried out on D-Island, including:

• Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment;

• Hazard Control, and

• Recovery Preparedness.

Planned operational activities are reviewed to identify any significant HSE risks not managed by existing operational or maintenance procedures.

Routine maintenance and construction activities are carried out in accordance with standard procedures and practices (e.g. welding, scaffolding, lifting, use of powered tools, working at height etc.) and are managed under the D-Island Permit to Work System. Where necessary a job-specific safety analysis (JSA) is carried out and documented. The hazard analysis accompanies the Permit to Work documentation. Task Risk Identification Cards (TRIC) are used to document and follow up on any unsafe behaviours, acts or conditions identified by personnel at D-Island.

Where non-routine activities are identified as being complex, or having substantial associated risk levels, additional risk management studies may be required. These would typically be:

• Specific structured management processes, which may include hazard identification (HAZID) studies, allocation of responsibilities, setting objectives and targets, implementation of a HSE plan with training, procedures, monitoring and corrective action.

• For new activities that involve major hazards (See Part 4 of the HSE Case), an analysis similar to that carried out for major hazards identified in the HSE case is carried out.

3.4.2.2 Identification of Environmental Aspects and Impacts

Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (EIAs) have been carried out for the D-Island operation. Environmental aspects relevant to operation of the D-Island are shown in the Environmental Aspects Register. This covers effects to the environment arising from routine and non-routine activities and from emergency conditions.

The Environmental Aspects Register is under continuous review and is updated to incorporate any new activity that is assessed as having an environmental effect. Effects from such new activities are assessed, and controls identified, based on the principles of prevention of pollution, efficient use of fuels and energy, waste minimisation and responsible disposal.

Controls for environmental consequences of major accident hazard events are included in the analysis in Part 4 of the D-Island Drilling HSE Case. In any analysis of new major accident hazards, the environmental consequences are included.

3.4.2.3 Identification of Health Effects

Agip KCO carries out Health Risk Assessments as appropriate to evaluate the risks resulting from exposure to chemical or physical agents. Activities included in the scope are:

• Normal drilling operations;

• Routine maintenance; and

• Construction and pre-commissioning activities.

During operations COSHH (Control of Substances Hazardous to Health) assessments are conducted by competent persons to identify the risks associated with the materials and the precautions that must be employed. COSHH assessments make use of the materials data sheets.

Agip KCO Health Management System

The Agip KCO Health Management System defines the framework for managing and safe guarding the health of the workforce at D-Island. The Health Management system lays down the requirements for:

• Medical Fitness Examination;

• Transportation of injured and/or sick personnel;

• Analytical laboratory services;

• Manual handling;

• Display Screen Equipment (DSE);

• Infectious disease prevention;

• Prophylaxis;

• Vaccination;

• Health, Education and Training;

• First Aid Training; and

• Hygiene Surveillance.

3.4.2.4 Assessment of Risk Level

Use of the Agip KCO Risk Matrix

All hazards which have the potential to cause:

• Harm to people, injury or ill health (including neighbours and communities);

• Adverse effects on the environment;

• Damage to or loss of assets; and

• Impact on company’s reputation (stakeholder concern).

are assessed and risk evaluated. The assessment will normally be qualitative but in selected cases may be quantitative. Quantitative or semi-quantitative assessments are used only for major activities where it is considered that there may be a significant effect on D-Island Drilling Operations Risk Levels. Further information on overall risk levels are contained in Part 4 of this HSE Case.

Assessment of risk is carried out using the Agip KCO Risk Assessment Matrix, shown in Figure 3.6.

Figure 3.6 : Agip KCO Risk Assessment Matrix Risk Tolerability and ALARP

The acceptability of carrying out an activity where the risk is identified as being in each risk region of the risk matrix are:

LOW Tolerable risk. No further impact reduction measures are necessary.

Monitor performance and mange for continuous improvement MEDIUM Compulsory impact reduction required. Risk is tolerable when

appropriate control measures have been identified and implemented.

HIGH Intolerable without detailed justification. Does not satisfy initial

screening criteria. Additional risk reduction measures required. Justifiable if compliance with ALARP principle and individual and societal risk criteria are demonstrated.

For an activity to be allowable, the assessed risk level should be in the tolerable zone (i.e. in either the Medium or Low risk region). For some activities, where fatalities have occurred in Agip KCO or main contractors, the assessed risk level is likely to fall in the intolerable zone. In this case, sufficient controls must be identified such that the risk level for future operations is considered to lie in the tolerable zone. In addition to being in the tolerable zone, risks will be reduced to a level as low as is reasonably practicable (ALARP).

In demonstrating ALARP, consideration is given to all the hard and soft issues related to the options available, and involves consideration of issues such as:

• Is the activity really necessary?

• Should different options for carrying out the activity be considered?

• Can high risk elements of the work be eliminated, or the associated risk reduced?

All reasonably practicable means of reducing risk are to be implemented. Where risk reduction is possible, but at a cost disproportionate with the level of risk reduction provided, agreement is sought from the Agip KCO Operations Director for carrying out the activity in the absence of such risk reduction measures.

Associated Documents

GE00.HSE.H20.PR.0005.000 ALARP Documentation and Demonstration GE00.HSE.H20.RE.0002.000 Corporate Risk Tolerability Criteria

GE00.HSE.H20.MF.0002.000 Hazards and Effects Management Process (HEMP) Framework Document

GE00.KST.K03.PR.0001.000 Risk Management Framework GE00.HSE.H20.PR.0002.000 Permit to Work System Procedure GE00.HSE.H20.PR.0001.000 Workplace Risk Assessment Procedure

KE01-B0-000-AK-H-YE-0001.000 Offshore Complex Environmental Impact Assessment KE01-00-000-AK-H-PR-0609-000 Evaluation of Environmental Aspects and Impacts KE01-00-000-AK-H-PR-0609-002 Environmental Aspects Register

[-] ENI-Agip Integrated HSE Management System Organisation and Corporate HSE Guidelines

GE00.HRO.K00.MA.0001.000 Agip HRO High Level Manual GE00.DRO.K00.QP.0001.000 Health Management Strategy

3.4.3 Emergency Preparedness & Response (ER)