• No se han encontrado resultados

EL APRENDIZAJE SERVICIO

5.2. Antecedentes y bases teóricas del Aprendizaje Servicio

Uzbekistan is an authoritarian state with a very strong and developed appara- tus of control which views radical Islam as its main enemy. In practice, almost every occurrence, not only of Salafism, but also of piousness within the Hanafi school of Sunni Islam traditional to the region, is regarded as radicalism, and

can result in persecution (including long prison sentences and torture) 255. In

Uzbekistan there is no serious threat of radical Islam – the level of the security services’ control over society is immense, there are no radical Islamic organi- sations active in the country, and almost all volunteers from Uzbekistan who joined the ranks of Islamic terrorist organisations in Afghanistan or Syria, were recruited on-line while working in Russia or Turkey.

253 The IMU limited its reaction to issuing a statement in which the movement condemned vio-

lence between Muslims in the Fergana Valley.

254 During the conflict in south Kyrgyzstan the IMU’s Emir was an Uzbek – Usman Odil, while

its chief military commander was an ethnic Kyrgyz – Abbas Mansur.

255 Human Rights Watch Report – http://www.hrw.org/world-report/2014/country-chapters/

PR A C E O SW 09 /20 12 O SW R EP O R T 09 /20 15

The persecution of Muslims has been underway since Uzbekistan gained its independence, and it is interlinked with combating the opposition. In the

1990s there were Islamic organisations256 and a secular opposition257 operat-

ing in the country, yet in the later period both of these were liquidated by the authorities. Despite this, the repressions (which also serve as an instru- ment of control over society) increased. Every occurrence of the profession of Islam outside of the norms set by the state and the institutions it controls,

can be qualified as extremism or terrorism258. In the past Uzbekistan has suf-

fered from the actions of Islamic radicalism (for example the second Batken

crisis259), but during the last fifteen years only two attacks actually organ-

ised by Islamic terrorists took place there – all the other attacks were prob-

ably orchestrated as provocations by the authorities260. Up to several thou-

sand Uzbek citizens are fighting, or have fought in the past, in the ranks of terrorist organisations (above all the IMU), but this does not take place in Uzbekistan, but rather in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria. Even the policy of Uzbekistan’s government shows that Uzbek Islamic radicals do not cur- rently constitute a threat to Uzbekistan itself – Uzbekistan is undertaking aggressive actions outside of its borders aimed at the anti-regime opposition (both those secular and moderately Islamic), but it has not undertaken simi-

lar steps against the Uzbek radicals’ terrorist organisations261.

256 For example the well-known Adolat in the Fergana Valley, also such organisations as Tauba

or Islam Lashkarlary. Based on: Stanisław Zapaśnik, „Walczący islam” w Azji Centralnej…,

op. cit., pages 79-80.

257 For example Muhammad Salih’s Erk (Freedom) party.

258 For example praying outside of the mosques (in which a wide network of informers operates),

possession of classical Islamic literature or recordings of sermons delivered even by non-fun- damentalist Islamic scholars: http://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=1942

259 Second Batken crisis – IMU militants’ raids, launched from the territory of Tajikistan, on

Kyrgyzstan’s Batken province and fighting on a limited scale in Uzbekistan’s Surxondaryo province and Yangiabad region, in proximity of Tashkent, all in August of 2000. The fight- ing led to dozens of fatalities and resulted in the IMU being forced to withdraw to Afghani- stan. Further in footnote 36.

260 Conducted by the Islamic Jihad Union in Bukhara and Tashkent in 2004: http://www.nefa-

foundation.org/file/FeaturedDocs/nefaijuoct08.pdf

261 For example assassination attempt at opposition imam Obidhon Nazarov in 2012 in Sweden,

where he resided as a political refugee; kidnapping of people from the territory of the Rus- sian Federation: http://enews.fergananews.com/articles/2789 and http://www.uznews. net/ru/human-rights/26684-v-moskve-pohitili-uzbeka-kotoryj-mnogo-znajet-o-gulnare- karimovoj

PR A C E O SW 09 /20 12 O SW R EP O R T 09 /20 15

Despite large scale persecution262, Islam in Uzbekistan is developing (for ex-

ample the practice of religious rites is becoming increasingly popular263). One

reason for this is Uzbekistan’s massive labour migration – mainly to Russia

(2.5 million people264), but also to Turkey. Uzbeks are radicalised and decide

to leave for Syria precisely while they are abroad. Under current conditions, the return of Uzbek militants from Syria or Afghanistan to Uzbekistan is im- possible, due to the repressions they would face. Nevertheless, Uzbekistan’s authorities are exploiting the problem of the participation of its citizens in the war taking place outside of its borders to combat the opposition and to further tighten its grip on society. The only hypothetical situation in which Islamic fundamentalism and radicalism could start to play an important role in Uzbekistan is if a serious political and economic crisis were to occur there which would lead to the collapse of the state structures. A crisis of this kind is conceivable – the causes of it could be both the economic based social ten- sions which have been suppressed for years, or the infighting within the elite and a conflict over the transition of power after President Islam Karimov, who has been in office since 1991. However, it currently seems that the secu- rity services, which exert total control over society and the elite, would be able to cope with this situation and guide the state to a bloodless transition of power.