II. MARCO TEÓRICO
4. Detentación o tenencia
3.5. Naturaleza de la sentencia declarativa de propiedad por usucapión
Mean Value Mean Difference C.I Kalaripayattu Group Karate Group Combined Group Control Group 53.25 2302 2325 23.0 2302 2506 204* 2302 2085 217* 2325 2506 181* 2325 2085 240* 2506 2085 421*
The table IV shows that the mean difference between kalaripayattu training group and combined training group, karate training group and control group, karate training group and combined training group ,karate training group and control group , combined training and control group on
TRANS Asian Research Journals
http://www.tarj.in
116
cardiovascular endurance are 204,217,181,240 and 421 respectively. It is greater than the confidence interval value of 53.25. Hence it was proved that there were significant differences in the effects on cardiovascular endurance.
The mean difference between kalaripayattu training group and karate training group on cardiovascular endurance are 23 respectively. It is less than the confidence interval value of 53.25. Hence it‘s proved that the there is insignificant differences in the effects on cardiovascular endurance.
The mean value of pre test, post test and adjusted post test of kalaripayattu training group karate training group combined training group and control group on cardiovascular endurance were graphically represented in figure –2
Figure – 2
Bar Diagram Showing the Mean Value of Pre Test, Post Test and Adjusted Post Test of Kalaripayattu Training Group Karate Training Group Combined Training Group and Control Group on Cardiovascular Endurance
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of the study reveals that there is a significant difference between pre test and post test of kalaripayattu training group, karate training group and combined training group on flexibility. There is an insignificant difference between pre test and post test of control group on flexibility.
The results of the study reveals that there is a significant difference between pre test and post test of kalaripayattu training group, karate training group and combined training group on cardiovascular endurance. There is an insignificant difference between pre test and post test of control group on cardiovascular endurance.
It was concluded that the kalaripayattu training group, karate training group, combined training group is better than the control group on flexibility due to the respective training programmes. Hence the karate training group is better than the kalaripayattu training group and combined
TRANS Asian Research Journals
http://www.tarj.in
117
training group on flexibility. And also combined training group is better than the kalaripayattu training group and on flexibility.
Regarding statistical analysis, it was observed that there is a significant difference among kalaripayattu training group, karate training group, combined training group and control group on cardiovascular endurance.
CONCLUSION
It was concluded that the kalaripayattu training group, karate training group, combined training group is better than the control group on flexibility due to the respective training programmes. Hence the karate training group is better than the kalaripayattu training group and combined training group on flexibility. And also combined training group is better than the kalaripayattu training group and on flexibility.
It was concluded that, the kalaripayattu training group, karate training group, combined training group is better than the control group on cardiovascular endurance due to the respective training programmes. Hence the combined training group is better than the kalaripayattu training group and karate training group. And also there is an insignificant difference between kalaripayattu training group and karate training group on cardiovascular endurance.
REFERENCES
1. Balakrishnan, P.I. (2003). Kalaripayattu : The Ancient Martial Art Of Kerala. Kozhikode. Poorna publications p.p 35, 40-152.
2. Barry Johnson, L., & Jack Nelson (1982). Practical Measurements For Evaluation In Physical Eduaction . Delhi : Surjeet publication. p-45.
3. Venkatachalam.R (2005), Kalaripayattu : The divine Martial of God‘s Own country.
4. Kesava Chandran, C., Harikumaran Nair, R and Shashidhar, S (2004). Respiratory Function In Kalaridpayattu Practioners. Indian Journal of Physiological and Pharmacology. 48 (2) : 235-240.
5. Mori. S. Ohtani Y and Imanaka, K (2002). Reaction times and anticipatory skills of Karate athletes. Hum Mov Sei. (2) : 213-30.
TRANS Asian Research Journals http://www.tarj.in
118
A s i a n J o u r n a l o f
M u l t i d i m e n s i o n a l
R e s e a r c h
( A J M R )
( D ou b l e B li n d R ef e r e e d & R e vi e w e d I n te r n a ti on a l J ou r n a l ) UGC A PPRO VED JO URN ALEFFECT OF VARIOUS NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS ON THE
SELECTED PHYSICAL VARIABLES OF WOMEN STUDENTS
Mr. Kishore kumar *; Dr. S. Glady Kirubakar **
*Research scholar, **Asst. Professor,
YMCA College of physical education, Chennai, INDIA.
__________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
Understanding the role of nutrients on the physical performance is essential. Undoubtedly sports training always increase the sports performance but acquiring the knowledge about nutritional supplements during training is important for the physical education fraternity. A study was conducted to find out the effect of various nutritional supplements on the selected physical variables of women students. To achieve the purpose of the study 30 women college students from various colleges in Chennai were selected randomly. Selected subjects were divided into three equal groups of ten each. Experimental group I was given 12 weeks of sports drink and experimental group II was given 12 weeks of nutritional bar supplementations and control group was not given any specific nutritional diet. Pretest and posttest was conducted on the selected subjects before and after the experimental period on speed and agility. Collected data was analysed by using statistical procedure ANCOVA to find out the significant difference. The level of confidence was fixed as 0.05. It was concluded that nutritional drink supplementation group showed significant improvement on speed and agility than nutritional bar supplementation group and control group.