• No se han encontrado resultados

Acerca del modo de mantenimiento

Copies o f this thesis will be disseminated in the Hamilton School District to the district curriculum director, who has already expressed interest in reading this work, the superintendent, and the school board, requesting that the research be reviewed since it covers an area that has been in need of analysis. One copy of this thesis will be in the School of Education at Grand Valley State University and another copy in the Grand Valley State University Library. Others interested in the findings o f this research will be able to access it through the UMI database online.

REFERENCES

Alexander, K., & Alexander, M.D., (1998). American Public School Law. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.

Bunch, G.C., Abram, P.L., Lotan, R.A., & Valdes, G., (2001). Beyond sheltered

instruction: rethinking conditions fo r academic language development. TESOL Journal, Autumn, 28-33.

Carrasquillo, A.L., & Rodriguez, V., (1995). Language M inority Students in the

Mainstream Classroom. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Clair, N. (2000). Teaching educators about language: principles, structures, and

challenges. Washington D.C. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.

(E R IC D o c u m e n t R e p ro d u c tio n S e rv ic e N o .E D O -F L -0 0 -0 8 ). Available:www.cal.org/ericcll/0008teaching.html.

Collier, V.P., (1988). The effect o f age on acquisition o f a second language fo r school. U.S. Docs. Ed. 1.49/2:987/2 New Focus., National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Coltrane, B. (2002). English language learners and high-stakes tests: an overview o f the

issues. Washington, DC: Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (ERIC

D o cum ent R ep ro d u ctio n S ervice N o. E D O -F L -02-07). A v ailab le: www.cal.org.ericcll/digest/0207coltrane.html.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the

Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference; evidence form

an empirical study o f ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.

Echevarria, J. & Short, D. (2001). The effects o f sheltered instruction on the achievement o f

limited english proficient students. Center for Research on Education, Diversity &

Excellence. Available; www.cal.org/crede/si.htm.

Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

ERIC Digest. (2000). What elementary teachers need to know about language. Washington D.C. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (ERIC D o cum ent R ep ro d u ctio n S ervice N o. E D O -F L -0 0 -0 6 .) A v ailab le: www.cal.org/ericcll/0006fillmore.html.

Hagman, S., Moase-Burke, J., Morgan, B., Moten, B., Schewe, N., & Tipton, S. (1996). English as a second language endorsement in Michigan. Michigan Teachers of E n g lis h to S p e a k e rs o f O th e r L a n g u a g e s . A v a ila b le : mitesol.org/endorsement/mi endorse.htm#support.

Kindler, A. L., (2002). Survey o f the states ’ limited English proficient students and

available educational programs and services 1999-2000 summary report.

National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs.

Kreidler, C.J. (1986). ESL teacher certification. Washington D.C. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED276306). Available: www.ericfacilitv.net/ericdigests/ed276306.html.

Lan V. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974). Available: www.ed.gov/ocr/ELL/lau.html.

Leow, R.P. (1998). The effects o f amount and type o f exposure on adult learners’ L2

development in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 49-68.

Macedo, D. Literacies of Power: What Americans are not allowed to know. San Francisco: Westview Press.

Meyer, L.M. (2000). Barriers to meaningful instruction fo r English learners. Theory

into Practice, 39, 228-236.

News Release (Jan. 23, 2003). State hoard o f education directs department to create

alternate assessment fo r limited English proficient students.

Norris, J.M. & Ortega, L. Does type o f instruction make a difference? Substantive findings

from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51, 157-213.

Ovando, C.J., & Collier, V.P., (1998). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: teaching in

multicultural contexts (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Part IV: Glossary. U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights Programs for English Language Learners. Available: www.ed.gov/ELL/glossarv.html#lau.

Pienemann, M. (1989). Is Language Teachable? Applied Linguistics, 10, 186-214. Porter, R.P. (1999). The benefits o f English immersion. Educational Leadership, 57, 52-

56.

Pottinger, J.S. (1970). May 25 Memorandum. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. www.ed.gov/ocr/ELL/mav25.html.

Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity o f second language learning

under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.

Romano, Lynne. Historical need for ESL in Hamilton. January 17, 2003. Hamilton, MI.

Sale, Lois. Initial need for and services of ESL in Hamilton. January 17, 2003. Hamilton, ML

Soukome, Keoratsamy. Personal experience of learning English in Hamilton. January 15, 2003. Zeeland, ML

Swain, Robert. (2003). Legislation o f Interest to Principals; LEP Student M ust be Tested.

MEMSPA.

TESOL. (2001). Tesol statement on the acquisition o f academic proficiency in English. A l e x a n d r i a , V A . T E S O L , I n c . A v a i l a b l e www.tesol.org/assoc/statements/aeqproficiencv.html.

Thomas, W.P., & Collier, V.P., (1998). Two languages are better than one. Educational

Leadership, 55, 23-26.

Thomas, W.P., & Collier, V.P., (2001). A national study o f school effectiveness fo r

language minority students ’ long-term academic achievement. Report for the

Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence. Available: www.crede.ucsc.edu/research/llaa/1.l_final.html.

The fa c ts about . . . m aking gains every year. No C hild Left B ehind.

www.nclb.gov/start/facts/vearlv.html.

The fa c ts ab o ut E n g lish flu e n c y . N o C hild L e ft B ehind. A v ailab le: www.NoChildLeftBehind.gov.

Twyford, C.W. (1998). Age-related factors in second language acquisition. U.S. Docs. Ed. 1.49/2:987/2 New Focus., National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

U.S. Census Bureau. American Fact Finder. Available: factfinder.census.gov/bf/ lane. Walters, Krista. Need for ESL in Hamilton. January 19, 2003. Hamilton, MI.

Williams, M.L. (1991) September 27 1991 Memorandum.V.S. Department of Education O ffice for Civil R ights Program s for E nglish Language Learners. www.ed. gov/ocr/ELL/september27 .html.

Woodcock, R.W. & Sandoval, A.F. (1993). Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.

Youngs, C.S. & Youngs, G.A. Jr. (2001). Predictors o f mainstream teachers’ attitudes

APPENDICES

DISCLAIMER

The appendices contained in this document belong to this author. All other sources cited within this document, as far as my knowledge, is concerned do not infringe upon copyright laws.

APPENDIX A