2. L A S ALVACIÓN EN EL CCE
2.3 P RESENCIA DEL TEMA SOTERIOLÓGICO : LENGUAJE Y CLASIFICACIÓN
T he p att e :cn of
:is c1 ati.on of
t he virus e sin
��he vari ol) Scel ls and
pas s afe s i s s h own in T ab l e1 .
T ab le ·J
S ample
1 st Pas s c. ge
in :
P c:cs s a ge 2nd in :I
' rd in : ....I
r·�:,-�-:�---
.; t � L ... I I \,;. ..L ·-� • � � l ... - V - 4r--!.'1 -�
--r' ·---1
-j--_-,1
2_D74/2
(f
ae c e s)
'D74/1 3-4 9
112++
_)
2
1
1 .,
D74/1 8
D74/1 9A
11 11'
1 5
D7L�/1 9B
11I
1
!
6I 2
D/4/22-4
"3
� -
1
j
'
1
1
1
D74/25A
1 -
4
I �
+ Indi ce.t e s
no
CPE wasseen
by7
days pos t
inoculat ion .1
1
++
Indicates the number
ofdays post
inoculat i on when CPE wasfi rst seen .
1
Discv.ss ion
M o s t worke rs refe r t o the u s e of a
1 q-{
centrifur;edfae c al suspens i on f o r inoculat ion :l.nt o eell cuJ:t•Jre s , b ut make
no menti on of the pre c i se in o culat i on procedu:::'e , s o that the final con cent rat i on j n c ont act d. Lh the eel ls i s left un speci
fi e <l. As :.wmi11g that a furthe r dilut i on
or' 1 in 1 0 would t ake
place on in oeulation
,
as is c orn111on pract ice ,the
final c on cen t rati on on -che cel l s YJ01Jlcl be P.b out·; '1.
At th i s leve l , m o s t worl:e r5 mn.ke n o refG l'ence t o to:x.icit;r !Jro'u l cin s , t hougL S :p:;:-edbrow( 1 965)
d o e r; mentionthd
t oxicity vr2.s a p r ob l em with s o1:1e &roups of calf f aeces.It v1a:: f oUl1d :Ln this ser-ies of fae c.:G.l s aLipJ e s t hat toxicity wc..s c. s e ri ous problem e ven u sing a
0. 5%
faec
r.l suspen s i on on the ce ll s , md that reduc-ci cn t o0.25%
wasne c e s n ary for rout :Ln.e
use
to minimi se tha e f.fe ct . Why -� oxi c:i tyvras more of a p:r.'oc l em v:i i.h t he s e s awples i s unc�rt c..in ; it: clici n ot appe a r to be �·elated to 3JW p aJ.·ti c.:ular ''-f':e croup of �·n:i mal >
though s ome
batches
of filG c e s ne :ce •7mrse thmJ. otlwr-s. S p rc>.c"b row( 1 965)
s u g ge st ed. on t b e b as i s of hi s expe riDer.•t s the.t t he t ox i csu'o s t an c e y;as a bachn·i :::.l t oxj_n. _ I t m ay be th2..t variaU o r. :i 11
t oxicity :i. s re l .:l.t e d t o 0.i,;t ary f e.ct o:cs i!li'lue�1ci::1 e;
the intestinal
b acterial f l o c-a, or t oxin p:::-odu c t i on .
The u s e of ads orpt i on t e c hni que s for inocuJ at i on i s al s o a fre q uent ly used lat or
a
tory p l'Oc edure , part i c ul arly with t oxic s ub st an c e s , but did not appre ciab ly reduce the toxicity problem, only del ayLn.g the on s et ol the eff e ct � It would. appe ar that t he t oxin(
o r t oxins)
exert s it ' s effect on cell me t ab olism re l at ive ly qui ckl_y , 8..'1(1 that effect is to a large ext ent irre ver s ibl e , as repla.c.:ellltnt wi tJ:1 fre::;h medium Oi.d not c o r re et t he prob lem.Three c e 1 l vypes we re ut i l i sed f o r i s o l e�·C. :i. on purp o s e s , B ovine kidney w.d lun g c e l l ::> we re cho s en in ac c o rc.: :c� ce with the
re c on!rnendat ions of NwF e rran et
(
"1572) :
v1ho SU[;f:G S t sd that p rims:.ry cells of the s c;me f.pe c i e s as the t e �;t ruat f:n·ic.l r ..
f�ere:Cl.the b e st chan ce of' succe s sf 1..1l vi ral :i. r: oJ. <1.t i on . 3 e cond. c:.:cy c e l l:3 at e arly po.s s age v1·c rG howeve r
chosen :!:'or
Jchis s t uC::.y . r 2.the r th,:,.:-.ip rimo.ry cells, as of'fe ring a more ccns i�;t er.t 7;;rpe. o:f ;.!onolaye r
of unifo rm appe aranc e , and h avin g some prn.ct i c al ad.v <:.nt age s from t he p o int of v iev: of p r oduct i on . Lung c e l l s vmrG ij' CJ.udad.
e spe c i al ly becaus0 of the ir s uit ab ilit.·r f o r the i2 olo. b on of parvoviruse s , as B ;:;t e s
( 1 971 , "1 97 2 )
f om1.d they 0i�t ained.the hi ghe st rat e <jf i n ol at i on of the s e v:i ru s e s w:Lth tr; i s ce l l type , M o nkey kirlney c e l l s h ave b e en useCi. by a numb e r of autho rs
i s olat i on of e nci s :;udiss o n re o·vL"us -2 s . C oc: e quently � .A:f':::i c r-.::;
g:csen r:wnJ:ey kiOney c e lls
(
Vc ro)
v-;ere chosen :J.S Jell •:: tJ.--,i rd ceJ.J.type t o improve the chan c e s of d et e ct i on of thi s EJ'OU.p ol viJ.'"C 2-C::s .
It WW'· de c id e d t o l imit t he �mr!l> e r o f p o..s s o...:; ; s vf
s amples in the ab ove c e l l s to
3
as bein :?; con::; :L st entr; ith
"t�1e avail ab le re s ourc e s and yet s t i l l offeri.nt� 2. re 3 s cm a.-Dl Gc!:::mcs
of i s ol a t j on of � o s t of t he viru s o s l ikely to be encomrt ered. It -was re<:Ll i s od howevE.- r ,that
c o ron:l·.:i rus e s V!Ould. pro'c 2.b ly not b edet e ct e d by thi �o; f yJc em, as t �1e CPE i s rcpor·t ed by hl :;i1us e t
( 1 973a)
t o b e ve ry �.1 i t;ht and. indef'init e at t he t h i rr;. pas s a ge inb ovine kidney cel l s .
E quine serL'm was ch o s en f or s erou.5 enri cbme:nt
of
the ma:Ln.t enance med�_um a:::uc e r ino culat ion , as it we.s con::; ide red t ooffer the l e ast cl-"cnce of int e rfe rence "'i t h viral i s o l at i on . F o e t al u ovine senun .-�as c on s i o c reC!. unsuit abJ e , as
i t i s k..r1own
to
sometime s c ont ain a nt ib o d.i e s t o ent c rcvi ::::-u s e s(
D unne ·---et al . '1 97 3)
and
t o b ovine viral o.i a:uhoea virus(
Ho me r e t al . ,"19?3) .
'rhe
cxw:rrinat ion c:f haemat oxylin and e o ::> il1 st ainedmon ol aye rs at the encl of the thi rd pas t; a t:;e WD.s d e s i gned as an
adc.i t i onal che ck on t he pre sence of vi ral C PE 2nd more
part i cularly on tl:e pr oduct i on o:::., int renu c l e a.r
and
int
ra
c,yt
o- plasmi c inclusions , pax·t icuJ. arly �;hose :.'l ue .i;o parvovil'us es andre oviru s e s . Int r ac·1.uclear in slus ions hc:wc b e en reporh:d with
b ovil1o p arvovirus e s by
Sp.hn
al . , ( -i s;6C)
B at e s( 1 972)
and. Inab a e t( 1 S'7 3) .
Vlith re oviru� e s int racyt oplasmi cinc lusions have ·b een report eel by S c:-.1in
(
�355)
?lld Gomat o s _§;t al . ,( 1 962 ) .
Parvovirusen ars repor
t
ed. t o c.: aus .3 haemad sorpt ion ofguinea
pig md human type 0 e rthro cy t e s(Abin;:;.nti
a..n<i W arfie l d ,1 C: I' /.
')0 I ; B Ll.T� f-3 5 ' ,1
9'7 L r,)
� Hen ce gu:i.nec:� p i gertbrocyt es
w.sr2In ret r o s pe ct , s ome improYeP.!ent s can b e .in the p roc.�dure used i' o :c is
o
lation. I t nould t! C.V e b e en acivisable t oche clc the me dh;,n f rom the e n d o f t h e t llir(\. :p<:·.s � c. ge ill Vero <>�l } s
:f' O l' p resence
of
rcovj haem.:J.gr;l ut ini ns w::.th 11wne.n i;y:pe 0 1:2d cell ::;(
Le l'ns r et al . ,·1 963) .
A :furtl:e r :::l1 3 ck f o r Lacm,l.t:, [lut irlinst o b ovine orthro cyt e s i11 tlle s ame mecUUR y: ould al s C'l have b e en - useful t o c h e ck f o r reoviru.s 3 , as
th e s e
e1·th:coey te s a;")peargen e r ally t o b9 more re adily agglut inat ed than hUJJ\aJl t.ype 0 c e l l s with thi s .se rvtype
(
E gge rs al . ,'1 962) .
C o riph o sphene 0 o r acridi:·te orange st ains coulcl have
been used as an alt e rn at ive to h.:J.emat oxylin and e o 3 in s t ain , t o
che ck f o r viral inclusions. Their diffe rent Lll st o.ining
propert ies ·::ith re gard t o s in gle ond doub l e st rcnded nucl e i c
.:J.cids vvould h ave made t h e det e ct i on o f parv ovirus and re ovirus
inelusions s omewhat e as i e r . If' n e e e s r:: ary , monolaye rs t re ated
with the se f luo re s cent st ains . coul d hs.ve b een de st ained after
examinati on, and re:::>t ained v:ith haoma.t oxylin ar1d e o s in , as
An :1
mr>"·o vemen t in t he rat e o:' i s olation of v ir u s e scouJd. p rob ably
ha v e
been oi) t ained by the u s e o f c oncent rat ionte chni que s on the
f ae co s .
Using cbffe rc:mt ial
c ent rifugat i on , a pellet ofp
os
sible v i :c aJ. mat e r i aJ. co•..1ld h c.J.ve berm CJ)) :; a.ined andu
s
ed for
ino culat l u :-J. . Al t e rnat i v�ly , t he: f;::, e c e s could. h cwe b e en tre2.t ed wit h t ri fluorot rl clll o rethar1e f e D :J�; e o by pu lyethyleneglycol G080, as suggo st e a by Much .:::..:1d
Zajac
( 1 97 2 )
c;:ld by Bi shopet