Electoral Area Committee Agenda - July 3, 2019

(1)

June 21, 2019

METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT ELECTORAL AREA COMMITTEE

REGULAR MEETING

Wednesday, July 3, 2019 9:00 a.m.

28^th Floor Committee Room, 4730 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia

A G E N D A¹

1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

1.1 July 3, 2019 Regular Meeting Agenda

That the Electoral Area Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for July 3, 2019 as circulated.

2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES

2.1 January 30, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes

That the Electoral Area Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held January 30, 2019 as circulated.

3. DELEGATIONS

4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS

5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF

5.1 Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review – Public Engagement Process

Designated Speaker: Marcin Pachcinski, Division Manager, Electoral Area and Environment, Regional Planning

That the MVRD Board approve the scope of the proposed Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review and authorize staff to proceed with the engagement process as presented in the report titled “Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review – Scope of Work and Engagement Process”, dated June 17, 2019.

1Note: Recommendation is shown under each item, where applicable.

Electoral Area Committee

(2)

Electoral Area Committee Regular Agenda July 3, 2019 Agenda Page 2 of 2

5.2 Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw – Permit Fees

That the Electoral Area Committee receive for information the report dated June 17, 2019, titled “Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw – Permit Fees”.

5.3 Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study – Action Plan

That the MVRD Board endorse the actions as presented in the report dated June 14, 2019, titled “Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study – Action Plan” in response to the recommendations in the Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study.

5.4 Manager’s Report

That the Electoral Area Committee receive for information the report dated June 20, 2019, titled “Manager’s Report”.

6. INFORMATION ITEMS 7. OTHER BUSINESS

8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS 9. RESOLUTION TO CLOSE MEETING

Note: The Committee must state by resolution the basis under section 90 of the Community Charter on which the meeting is being closed. If a member wishes to add an item, the basis must be included below.

10. ADJOURNMENT/CONCLUSION

That the Electoral Area Committee adjourn/conclude its regular meeting of July 3, 2019.

Membership:

Hocking, David (C) - Bowen Island Belenkie, Neil – Belcarra

Feeley, Michael - Electoral Area A Guerra, Laurie - Surrey

Hardwick, Colleen - Vancouver McLaughlin, Ron - Lions Bay

(3)

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MVRD Electoral Area Committee held on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Page 1 of 4 METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT

ELECTORAL AREA COMMITTEE

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Metro Vancouver Regional District (MVRD) Electoral Area Committee held at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 in the 28^th Floor Committee Room, 4730 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia.

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Chair, Director Justin LeBlanc, Electoral Area A Vice Chair, Councillor David Hocking, Bowen Island Mayor Neil Belenkie, Belcarra

Councillor Laurie Guerra, Surrey Mayor Ron McLaughlin, Lions Bay MEMBERS ABSENT:

Councillor Colleen Hardwick, Vancouver STAFF PRESENT:

Marcin Pachcinski, Division Manager, Electoral Area and Environment, Planning and Environment Carol Mason, Chief Administrative Officer

Genevieve Lanz, Legislative Services Coordinator, Board and Information Services

1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

1.1 January 30, 2019 Regular Meeting Agenda It was MOVED and SECONDED

That the Electoral Area Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for January 30, 2019 as circulated.

CARRIED 2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES

2.1 October 3, 2018 Regular Meeting Minutes It was MOVED and SECONDED

That the Electoral Area Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held October 3, 2018 as circulated.

CARRIED 3. DELEGATIONS

No items presented.

2.1

(4)

4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS No items presented.

5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF

5.1 2019 Electoral Area Committee Priorities and Work Plan

Report dated January 7, 2019 from Marcin Pachcinski, Division Manager, Electoral Area and Environment, Regional Planning, Planning and Environment, providing the Electoral Area Committee with the priorities and work plan for the year 2019.

Members were provided a presentation on the Electoral Area Committee work plan and priorities, highlighting the governance structure, geographic makeup, and Official Community Plan.

Presentation material titled “2019 Work Plan Priorities and Committee Orientation – Electoral Area Committee” is retained with the January 30, 2019 Electoral Area Committee agenda.

It was MOVED and SECONDED

That the Electoral Area Committee endorse the work plan as presented in the report dated January 7, 2019 titled “2019 Electoral Area Committee Priorities and Work Plan”.

CARRIED 5.2 Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study

Report dated January 14, 2019 from Tom Pearce, Planner, Regional Planning, Planning and Environment, presenting the completed Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study for MVRD Board consideration.

Members were provided a presentation on the agricultural viability of Barnston Island, highlighting the project objectives, business case scenarios, and recommendations for Metro Vancouver’s consideration.

In response to questions, members were informed of jurisdictional authority regarding ferry scheduling, traffic safety concerns, drainage and diking upgrades, and farm-class tax status.

Request of Staff

Staff was requested to correct an error in the attachment to the report prior to being forwarded to the Board.

Presentation material titled “Barnston Island Agricultural Area Study” is retained with the January 30, 2019 Electoral Area Committee agenda.

(5)

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MVRD Electoral Area Committee held on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Page 3 of 4 It was MOVED and SECONDED

That the MVRD Board:

a) receive for information the “Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study”;

b) forward a copy of the “Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study” to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, Ministry of Agriculture, and the Agricultural Land Commission; and

c) direct staff to report back with an action plan considering the recommendations contained in the “Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study”.

CARRIED 5.3 Manager’s Report

Report dated January 14, 2019 from Marcin Pachcinski, Division Manager, Electoral Area and Environment, Regional Planning, Planning and Environment, updating the Electoral Area Committee on the Passage Island windstorm clean- up.

That the Electoral Area Committee receive for information the Manager’s Report dated January 14, 2018.

CARRIED 6. INFORMATION ITEMS

That the Electoral Area Committee receive for information the following Information Item:

6.1 Electoral Area A Bulletin - Winter 2018

CARRIED 7. OTHER BUSINESS

No items presented.

8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS No items presented.

9. RESOLUTION TO CLOSE MEETING No items presented.

(6)

10. ADJOURNMENT/CONCLUSION It was MOVED and SECONDED

That the Electoral Area Committee conclude its regular meeting of January 30, 2019.

CARRIED (Time: 10:48 a.m.)

____________________________ ____________________________

Genevieve Lanz, Justin LeBlanc, Chair

Legislative Services Coordinator

28404379 FINAL

(7)

29350445

To: Electoral Area Committee

From: Marcin Pachcinski, Division Manager, Electoral Area and Environment, Regional Planning

Date: June 17, 2019 Meeting Date: July 3, 2019

Subject: Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review – Scope of Work and Engagement Process RECOMMENDATION

That the MVRD Board approve the scope of the proposed Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review and authorize staff to proceed with the engagement process as presented in the report titled “Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review – Scope of Work and Engagement Process”, dated June 17, 2019.

PURPOSE

This report seeks Board approval of the scope of the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review, and authorization to begin engagement on the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review.

BACKGROUND

The Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw (Reference 1) was adopted in 2012. The MVRD Board adopted the first-ever Official Community Plan (OCP) (Reference 2) for the same portions of the Electoral Area that are covered by the zoning bylaw in July 2018. The OCP contains policies and map designations that are intended to guide land use, including the zoning bylaw, and therefore the zoning bylaw needs to be updated to reflect the OCP. The 2019 Electoral Area Committee Work Plan includes “Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review and Public Consultation Process – Initiation” in the second quarter.

This report presents the scope of the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review for approval, along with a proposed engagement process that allows interested parties to provide input on the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review.

ZONING BYLAW REVIEW

The Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw regulates the use, density, and siting of buildings and structures on land within the Electoral Area, excluding the UBC Lands, the University Endowment Lands, Bowyer Island, and Passage Island.

Since its adoption in 2012, the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw was amended once in 2016 to address lot coverage issues specific to the Strachan Point community, and to make a number of general amendments related to definition and regulation language, siting exemptions, and correcting references to tables within the bylaw.

During the 2016 amendment process, and through ongoing application of the zoning bylaw, staff have identified a number of issues with the zoning bylaw that warrant review, such as language in the definitions section, regulations related to accessory buildings and structures, and general formatting of the zoning bylaw for easier readability, among others.

5.1

(8)

Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review – Public Engagement Process Electoral Area Committee Regular Meeting Date: July 3, 2019 Page 2 of 4

Also, as previously mentioned, the OCP adopted by the MVRD Board in 2018 contains policies and map designations intended to guide land use, and therefore the zoning bylaw should be updated to reflect the OCP. This review will identify applicable OCP policies and recommend amendments to the current zoning bylaw to align zoning regulations with the policies of the OCP.

Additional zoning bylaw-related issues may arise through the engagement process that will also be considered as part of this review and brought back to the Electoral Area Committee and MVRD Board for consideration.

ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

Metro Vancouver is committed to engaging with those that have the potential to be impacted by Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review. Engagement will be done in a manner that incorporates feedback into project plans as appropriate. Metro Vancouver will provide a variety of forums, listed below, to learn about interests and concerns related to the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review.

This information will inform the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review and be reported back at the end of the process along with staff recommendations. The engagement process outlined below conforms to Metro Vancouver’s Public Engagement Board Policy.

Scope of the Engagement

Metro Vancouver will be seeking input on the following aspects of the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review:

 proposed amendments to the zoning bylaw stemming from the OCP, including short-term rental regulations;

 proposed amendments to definition language;

 proposed amendments to regulations related to specific aspects of the zoning bylaw, including, but not limited to, accessory buildings and structures and exceptions to height and siting requirements;

 zoning regulations specific to each community (i.e. Barnston Island, Ocean Point, etc.); and

 other zoning bylaw-related issues that arise through the engagement process.

Engagement Audiences

Staff have identified the groups who may be impacted by, or have an interest in, the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review:

 residents, property owners, and business operators in each community subject to the zoning bylaw;

 provincial and federal ministries and agencies (e.g. BC Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Land Commission, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, Transport Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada);

 First Nations whose reserve lands are adjacent to lands subject to the zoning bylaw (i.e. Katzie First Nation IR-3 on Barnston Island and IR-4 in the Widgeon area of Pitt Lake; Tsleil-Waututh First Nation IR-4 and IR-4A in Northern Indian Arm area);

 local governments adjacent to lands subject to the zoning bylaw; and

(9)

 Port of Vancouver.

Methods and Timing

In order to engage with the identified groups, the following methods are being proposed as part of the engagement strategy:

Method Purpose Timing

Community meetings with residents, property owners, and business operators in the 3 community areas (Howe Sound, Indian Arm/Pitt Lake and Barnston Island).

Provide information and solicit feedback on proposed zoning bylaw amendments from each community area (Howe Sound, Indian Arm/Pitt Lake and Barnston Island).

Summer 2019 (3 meetings) Fall 2019 (3 meetings) Winter 2019 (3 meetings)

Meetings and phone calls with individual or groups of residents in communities (e.g. Strachan Point, Ocean Point,

Montizambert Wynd, bays in Indian Arm and Pitt Lake).

Some zoning bylaw regulations apply to individual communities and some issues may be unique to particular areas (e.g. individual bays in Indian Arm or Pitt Lake).

Summer 2019 Fall 2019 Winter 2019

Letter/Email notification and updates.

Provide notification regarding community meetings,

opportunities to engage, and deliver updates on what we heard.

Summer 2019 Fall 2019 Winter 2019

Metro Vancouver website. Provide up to date information about the engagement process and proposed amendments to the zoning bylaw.

Ongoing beginning Summer 2019

ALTERNATIVES

1. That the MVRD Board approve the scope of the proposed Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review and authorize staff to proceed with the engagement process as presented in the report titled

“Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review – Engagement Process”, dated June 17, 2019.

2. That the Electoral Area Committee receive for information the report dated June 17, 2019, titled

“Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review – Engagement Process” and provide alternate direction to staff.

(10)

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

If alternative 1 is adopted, the review would be funded within the 2019 budget. The Board-approved 2019 budget for Electoral Area Services includes $24,000 for costs associated with the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review, including meeting venue rentals, postage, advertising (including the public hearing advertisements) and legal review costs.

SUMMARY / CONCLUSION

This report seeks approval of the scope of the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review and authorization to begin engagement on the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review. With the adoption of the first- ever Official Community Plan for the portions of the Electoral Area covered by the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw in July 2018, the 2019 Electoral Area Committee Work Plan included a review of the zoning bylaw as a second quarter work item. In addition to the OCP-related issues, the zoning bylaw will be reviewed to incorporate improvements to language and formatting identified by staff, and other issues identified through the engagement process. Meetings with residents, property owners, and business operators in Howe Sound, Indian Arm/Pitt Lake and Barnston Island in the summer, fall and winter 2019 are the principle engagement methods proposed for this review. Staff recommend Alternative 1.

References

1. Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw

2. MVRD Electoral Area A Official Community Plan

29350445

(11)

29342711

From: Tom Pearce, Planner, Regional Planning

Subject: Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw – Permit Fees RECOMMENDATION

That the Electoral Area Committee receive for information the report dated June 17, 2019, titled

“Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw – Permit Fees”.

PURPOSE

This report provides information on proposed revisions to the building permit fee schedule of GVRD Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006, which are part of a series of revisions that will be considered by the Electoral Area Committee and MVRD Board as a single bylaw amendment at a later date.

BACKGROUND

GVRD Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006, which regulates the construction of buildings in rural parts of the Electoral Area, was adopted in July 2006 and has not been amended since its adoption.

At the March 23, 2018 MVRD Board meeting, the following resolution was passed:

That the MVRD Board direct staff to review Greater Vancouver Regional District Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006 as presented in the report dated February 18, 2018, titled “Electoral Area A Building Inspection Function Review”.

Three main areas for review have been identified: bylaw language and regulations, permit fees, and service area boundaries. This report provides the Electoral Area Committee with information on proposed revisions to the permit fees. Reports on the other areas will be provided to the Committee later this year. A single bylaw amendment will then be prepared for consideration by the Electoral Area Committee and MVRD Board.

PERMIT FEE REVIEW

Schedule D of the GVRD Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006 lists the fees charged for various building inspection related services. The bylaw, including Schedule D, has not been reviewed or amended since its adoption in 2006. In addition, a review of the average annual permit revenues and expenses (described in the Financial Implications section of this report) revealed a gap that this review is intended to help address.

5.2

(12)

Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw – Permit Fees Electoral Area Committee Regular Meeting Date: July 3, 2019

Page 2 of 3

Staff reviewed these fees based on experience gained through their application to Electoral Area A building permits and the resources associated with each fee (e.g. Building Inspector review of plans, administrative costs, etc.).

In addition, staff researched five other local government jurisdictions (Village of Belcarra, District of North Vancouver, Fraser Valley Regional District, Squamish Lillooet Regional District and Sunshine Coast Regional District) to analyze how fees in Metro Vancouver’s Electoral Area A compare to adjacent Electoral Areas and municipalities. Local governments use different formulas and have a variety of fees associated with the building permit process, so the fee schedules for each government are not identical. However, generally, there are standard fees such as building permit application fees and construction value calculations that allow for meaningful comparisons among jurisdictions.

The current and proposed building permit fees for GVRD Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006 are presented in Attachment 1.

Permit Fee Increases

Based on the Bank of Canada’s consumer price index, there has been an approximate 25% increase in prices since 2006. To account for this inflation, a number of fees, including the construction value calculation, are proposed to increase by approximately 25% (see the Financial Implications section of this report for more information). In some instances, no change is proposed based on analysis of resources and the fees charged in comparable local government jurisdictions. Comments on the rationale and exceptions are noted in the same column as the proposed fee in Attachment 1.

Construction Value Fee Comparison

Fees based on the construction value of a project typically represent the largest portion of building permit fees. Using a simple construction value calculation (i.e. not including fees per plumbing fixtures), the table below presents current and proposed fees in a number of construction value categories in Metro Vancouver’s Electoral Area A, alongside those from comparable jurisdictions:

Table 1. Current and Proposed Building Permit Fees Based on Construction Value (20XX - fees last updated)

Construction Value

Electoral Area A Current

Electoral Area A Proposed

Village of Belcarra

District of North Vancouver

Fraser Valley RD

Squamish Lillooet RD

Sunshine Coast RD

Fees last updated 2006 n/a 2019 2018 2017 2015 2014

$20,000 $303 $380 $270 $357 $330 $305 $268

$100,000 $1175 $2088 $1700 $1353 $1050 $1145 $943

$500,000 $4375 $6460 $4500 $6153 $4650 $3665 $4593

$1,000,000 $8375 $11460 $8500 $12153 $9650 $7865 $9043

ALTERNATIVES

This is an information report; no alternatives are presented.

There are no financial implications to this report as it is being presented for information and discussion. At a future date, if the MVRD Board amends Schedule D of GVRD Electoral Area A Building

(13)

Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw – Permit Fees Electoral Area Committee Regular Meeting Date: July 3, 2019

Page 3 of 3

Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006 and adopts the proposed permit fees shown in Attachment 1, there will be an increase in revenue associated with each new building permit application. Given the proposed construction value-based fee increase is 25% (to account for inflation since the bylaw was adopted in 2006) and since all permits for new construction include a construction value, at a minimum, each new building permit will generate 25% more revenue.

The total revenue generated by the increase in relation to the costs of the building inspection service varies year-to-year based on the annual number and value of permits. Based on a review of costs and permit fee revenues over the last ten years, on average, the building inspection service costs approximately $14,000 annually and permit fee revenues have been $10,000 annually. If Schedule D is amended, average annual revenues can be expected to increase by $2,500 to $12,500.

Given low application volumes (less than 10 per year), considerable annual fluctuations in permit fee revenues are unavoidable. However, the revised permit fees will improve the ability of permit fees to cover the cost of providing the building inspection function. If Schedule D is amended, staff will continue to monitor the annual costs and revenues and report back with that information to the Electoral Area Committee.

The MVRD Board directed staff to review the GVRD Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006, including bylaw language and regulations, service area boundaries, and permit fees, This report addresses permit fees. Staff have reviewed the current fees based on the permit processing resources (e.g. building inspector plan review) and compared fees charged by five similar local governments.

To account for inflation since 2006, a number of fees, including the construction value calculation, is proposed to increase by approximately 25%, which is expected to generate $2,500 in additional annual revenues. Attachment 1 shows the current and proposed fees. Overall, the revised permit fees will increase the ability of permit fees to cover the cost of providing the building inspection function.

Reports on the other key areas of the review (bylaw language and regulations and service area boundaries) will be provided to the Committee later this year for information and discussion. The Committee’s input will help staff shape a bylaw amendment addressing all areas of the review, which will then be prepared for consideration by the Electoral Area Committee MVRD Board.

Attachment

Current and Proposed Fees for Schedule D of GVRD Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006

Reference

GVRD Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006

29342711

(14)

Current and Proposed Fees for Schedule D of

GVRD Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006

CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE (and comments) 1. Minimum fee for any building permit

application (deducted from building permit fee if application is approved)

$75 $150

(in line with comparable local governments)

2. Deposit required when building permit application is approved (returned when the occupancy permit is issued or, for structures not requiring an occupancy permit, upon the Building Official’s authorization that the project is fully completed)

1.0% of construction value

No change

3. For single family residential and accessory building construction work, if the construction value is:

- $0 to $1,000 - $1,001 to $50,000

- $50,001 to $100,000

- $100,001 and over

$75.00

$75.00 plus $12.00 per

$1,000 of construction value or fraction thereof exceeding the first

$1,000

$675.00 plus $10.00 per

$1,000.00 of construction value or fraction thereof exceeding $50,000

$1,175.00 plus $8.00 per

$1,000 of construction value or fraction thereof exceeding $100,000

Approximately 25%

increase, equivalent to infationary increase since bylaw adoption in 2006

$95.00

$95.00 plus $15.00 per $1,000 of construction value or fraction thereof exceeding the first

$1,000

$850.00 plus $12.50 per $1,000.00 of construction value or fraction thereof exceeding $50,000

$1,470.00 plus

$10.00 per $1,000 of construction value or fraction thereof exceeding $100,000

ATTACHMENT

(15)

For Commercial, Industrial, Assembly and Institutional Buildings

An additional $1.00 over the rates listed for residential and accessory building construction per

$1,000 of construction value or fraction thereof.

No change (very few examples of such buildings in Electoral Area A where this bylaw applies)

4. Where a building permit has been issued but construction has not commenced and the property owner has provided written notification that the project will not be undertaken

50% of the building permit fee and 100% of the deposit shall be refunded to the property owner

No change

5. Where no changes are proposed in design or siting, for the re-application of a building permit which has lapsed, if requested in writing by the property owner

$75.00 or 20% of the current building permit fee, whichever is greater

$300.00

(double the building permit application fee; admin costs covered)

6. Plan review for building design modifications

$75.00 $75.00 per hour

(consistent with comparables, which charge per hour, and better reflective of review costs)

7. Transfer of a building permit $75.00 $300.00

(double the building permit application fee; would cover admin costs, title search and reacceptance of consultant schedules) 8. Permit to install plumbing $20.00 per fixture with a

minimum fee of $75.00

No change (consistent with comparables; main fee increase captured in construction value calculation) 9. Permit to install a chimney, heating

device which is connected to the chimney, or a fireplace (masonry or factory-built chimney)

$75.00 per chimney, heating device or fireplace

No change (consistent with comparables; main fee increase captured in construction value calculation)

(16)

10. Any application for a permit not specifically provided herein

$75.00 $150.00

(same as building permit application fee)

11. Where it has been determined by the Building Official that due to non- compliance with the provisions of this Bylaw or the British Columbia Building Code, more than two inspections are necessary for a single type of

inspection, the fee for each inspection after the second inspection

$100.00 $125.00

(25% inflationary increase since 2006)

12. Demolishing a structure $100.00 if less than 46 square metres, $175.00 if 46 square metres or more

$150.00

(consistent with comparables)

13. Permit for moving a building or structure within the Regional District

Inspection fee for examination of a building or structure prior to move

Inspection fee if inspection exceeds two hours

$250.00 per building or structure

$55.00 per hour

$70.00 per hour 25% increase, equivalent to infationary increase since bylaw adoption in 2006

14. Cash or letter of credit deposit prior to issuing a permit to move a building to ensure that the exterior of the building is completed within ninety (90) days of the permit issuance.

$20,000.00 No change

15. Cash or letter of credit bond deposit to indemnify the Regional District against all damages to Regional District and other public property of any kind, howsoever caused by the moving of a building

$10,000.00 No change

(17)

16. Where a building permit is issued for a property not accessible by motor vehicle via a public road and must instead be accessed by an alternative means of transportation by the Building Official

$50 to $250.00 Actual cost

17. For providing property title search from Land Title Office (per title)

$30.00 $38.00

25% increase, equivalent to infationary increase since bylaw adoption in 2006

18. For obtaining and/or providing a copy of an instrument registered on the property title

Actual cost No change

19. For registration and review of Section 219 covenant placed according to Land Title Act

$350.00 $440.00

20. For discharge of Section 219 covenant placed according to Land Title Act

$100.00 $125.00

21. For registration and review of priority agreements

$150.00 $190.00

22. For discharge of notices placed under the Local Government Act or

Community Charter

$100.00 $125.00

(18)

From: Tom Pearce, Planner, Regional Planning and Electoral Area Services

Subject: Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study – Action Plan RECOMMENDATION

That the MVRD Board endorse the actions as presented in the report dated June 14, 2019, titled

“Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study – Action Plan” in response to the recommendations in the Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to present proposed actions related to the recommendations contained in the Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study for the Electoral Area Committee and MVRD Board’s consideration.

BACKGROUND

In July 2018, the MVRD Board adopted the Electoral Area A Official Community Plan (OCP) for portions of the Electoral Area where the MVRD is responsible for local land use planning, including Barnston Island. Conducting a study to explore ways to improve the long-term viability of agriculture on the island was an action item identified through the development of the OCP.

The Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study (Reference 1) was completed and presented to the Electoral Area Committee in January 2019. At the February 22, 2019 MVRD Board meeting, the Board passed the following resolutions:

That the MVRD Board:

a) receive for information the “Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study”;

b) forward a copy of the “Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study” to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, Ministry of Agriculture, and the Agricultural Land Commission; and

c) direct staff to report back with an action plan considering the recommendations contained in the “Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study”.

This report responds to resolution c).

BARNSTON ISLAND

Barnston Island is located in the Fraser River between Surrey and Pitt Meadows, within Metro Vancouver Electoral Area A, and is home to Katzie First Nation Reserve No. 3. Barnston Island is within the traditional territory of the Katzie First Nation and was settled by Europeans in the mid 1800’s.

The island is accessed through the Barnston Island Ferry which connects the island from Surrey (on 104 Avenue) across Parsons Channel and is an approximately five-minute crossing. Metro Vancouver

5.3

(19)

Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study – Action Plan Electoral Area Committee Regular Meeting Date: July 3, 2019 Page 2 of 8

owns Barnston Island Regional Park with park amenities at Robert Point Rest Area on the western tip of the island, and undeveloped Mann Point on the eastern end.

The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure has jurisdiction for the ferry service (tug and barge), as well as the public roads on the Island (unlike municipalities). Metro Vancouver is responsible for local land use planning and building inspections (except on the Katzie reserve).

Nearly 99% (618 ha) of Barnston Island is located within the provincial Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR). Metro Vancouver has zoned the island ‘Agricultural B-1’ with park uses permitted at the regional park sites and protected areas. The first zoning bylaw for the Island came into effect in 2005, with minimum lot sizes of 20 hectares. There are a number of lots which pre-date this first zoning bylaw and are considered legal non-conforming. Agriculture has been a prominent land use on Barnston Island for over a century. Agricultural operations on Barnston Island today are primarily hay, cranberries and pastures for the beef and dairy farms. Forage crops are very productive, with as many as four crops of hay per year. There is a culinary herb farm operating on the island, a small-scale chicken operation with farm-gate egg sales and several small mixed hobby farms with sheep, goats and horses.

The Agricultural Land Use Inventory (ALUI) completed for Barnston Island by the BC Ministry of Agriculture in 2010 found that more than half (57%) of the island is currently used for farming, 17%

of the island is not available for farming and more than a quarter (26%) is available for farming activities but is not currently being used.

Barnston Island has a diking system that encircles the entire island for protection against floodwaters.

There is a 10 km paved road that sits on top of the dike and another road that stretches across the island, which is paved in most sections. Residents of Barnston Island must leave the island for basic goods and services as there are no commercial or health services on the island.

In 2006, there was a major application for exclusion of Barnston Island from the ALR made by developers with support from some island landowners to the Agricultural Land Commission. The application was refused.

Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study

The Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study (Reference 1) provides a comprehensive review of the agricultural context for Barnston Island including its history, land tenure, viability and access. The study’s work included an analysis of the opportunities and challenges facing farmers on the island;

investigating the economic opportunities of potential agricultural uses, consultation with MV’s Agricultural Advisory Committee (AAC) on the development of recommendations for MV;

presentation of the draft plan to the community and involved stakeholders; and compilation of a final report for MV and presentation to the Electoral Area Committee. Key themes identified: drainage, diking, irrigation, drinking water, soils, agricultural capability, climate, and climate change.

The study outlines several opportunities for agriculture on Barnston Island through a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis, summarized in the report as follows:

(20)

The SWOT analysis indicates that Barnston Island has great growing conditions for a wide variety of crops, including access to irrigation water. Farmland is relatively affordable as compared to other land in the region. However, poor drainage conditions hamper the suitability of some agricultural activities, and infrastructure upgrades would be required to reach optimal growing conditions. Challenges include attracting new and emerging farmers to stimulate production on underutilized farmland. This is related in part to limitations involved in access to the island as well as changes in land tenure which have resulted in more non-farmers owning land on Barnston Island and a lack of long term leases (e.g. more than 10 years) being made available.

Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study Recommendations

The study identifies eight recommendations that Metro Vancouver can consider to improve agricultural viability on Barnston Island:

1. Continue to work with the Province towards improved ferry service and road safety.

2. Continue to support Katzie First Nation endeavours.

3. Consider conducting a drainage study for the Island (for Agriculture).

4. Increase efforts around compliance and enforcement of derelict residences.

5. Consider working with the community on an Agri-Tourism Strategy.

6. Investigate ways to increase long-term land tenure to support farming.

7. Promote Metro Vancouver agricultural policies and regulations.

8. Erect agricultural signage.

Each study recommendation is listed below, with a summary analysis of impacts, expected outcomes, and resource requirements, as appropriate. For each one, a proposed action is listed for consideration by the Electoral Area Committee and MVRD Board.

1. Continue to work with the Province towards improved ferry service and road safety

Metro Vancouver has had an advocacy and collaborative role with respect to ferry service to and from Barnston Island for many years. The ferry is a critical linkage for Islanders in general, and for farmers and farm workers specific to agricultural viability. Over the last 20 years, Metro Vancouver has sent letters seeking ferry service improvements to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure requesting longer services hours, a larger barge to enable 50 ton trucks, drive on drive off service, and ramp improvements.

Road safety improvements through the Ministry of Transportation and infrastructure could include the intersection at 104 Avenue and Golden Ears connector, increased number of pull offs from the dike road to reduce farm equipment conflicts with pedestrians and bikers; and a review public signage and messages for recreationists for both in and outside of the park sites in order to have a more integrated signage system and prevent parking on the inside curve of the dike.

This consultant recommendation calls on Metro Vancouver to continue to work with the Province to advocate for improvements to the ferry service and for better road safety to support agricultural viability. This recommendation reflects current staff efforts in this area and can be achieved with existing resources. Staff regularly work with Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure on issues

(21)

of mutual concern, such as the Barnston ferry, the intersection at 104 Avenue and Golden Ears connector, Dyke Road maintenance and unauthorized dumping.

As per the February 2019 Board recommendation note above, Metro Vancouver forwarded a copy of the Barnston Island Agriculture Viability Study, highlighting the specific recommendations related to improved ferry service to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.

Proposed Action

That Metro Vancouver continue dialogue with the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to improve the access to the Island, and follow up on the recommendations as laid out in the Barnston Island Agriculture Viability Study.

2. Continue to support Katzie First Nation endeavours

This recommendation highlights opportunities to work more closely with the Katzie First Nation on Katzie-led initiatives that support biodiversity, traditional food harvesting, and foraging. Previous collaboration between Metro Vancouver staff and the Katzie First Nation on Barnston island has included OCP consultation meetings, joint emergency planning and response. The recommendation mentions an Island-wide drainage study (described in recommendation 3 below) or an on-reserve community garden. Future opportunities for exploration include native plant harvesting and demonstration garden and further emergency planning and preparedness activities.

Proposed Action

That Metro Vancouver continue to collaborate and share information with the Katzie First Nation and consult with the Nation when developing and implementing local land use plans.

3. Consider conducting an Agricultural Drainage Study for the Island

The study proposes an agricultural drainage study for Barnston Island to more fully and accurately assess the status of surface and subsurface drainage on the island with an aim of improving agricultural soil capability. Much of Barnston Island is poorly drained and drainage patterns have been altered by residents over the years through fill and ditch alterations. Drainage dynamics on the Island are not well understood, and there is no study to rely on when considering land alterations that may impact drainage.

Proposed Action

That Metro Vancouver opt not to develop a drainage study at this time given Metro Vancouver does not have a local government drainage function for Barnston Island (or any other part of Electoral Area A).

4. Increase efforts around compliance and enforcement of derelict residences

Some of the buildings on the island present varying levels of concern, and their state of abandon helps to proliferate noxious weeds, and invasive species, among other unwanted uses of the abandoned sites. Clearing derelict residences and invasive species that overgrow them would increase the potential to use those sites for agriculture. If the residences were renovated and

(22)

maintained, they would provide potential housing for farmers and farm workers, thereby supporting agriculture on the island.

Following up on this recommendation would necessitate Metro Vancouver playing a more active role in the monitoring of derelict residences on the island (not including those on Katzie First Nation Reserve lands) and taking more action in enforcing GVRD Electoral Area “A” Unsightly Premises Bylaw No. 1198, 2014. Bylaw compliance and enforcement requires a significant amount of staff time and can include legal and administrative support costs. In October 2018, the MVRD Board adopted the Electoral Area A Bylaw Enforcement Policy (Reference 2). The purpose of this new policy, which applies to unsightly premises and nuisances, is to guide Metro Vancouver’s efforts in undertaking bylaw enforcement investigations and to define under what circumstances investigations should commence. Staff working directly with owners to find solutions can often be the most cost effective approach to compliance and enforcement.

Proposed Action

That Metro Vancouver continue to follow the recently adopted Electoral Area A Bylaw Enforcement Policy (Reference 2) to guide enforcement efforts related to derelict residences on Barnston Island.

5. Consider working with the community on an Agri-Tourism Strategy

The consultant recommended the development of a Agri-Tourism Strategy for Barnston Island to increase support the development of value added products and increase farm gate sales. Direct sales farmer-to-consumer have been successful in other communities. During the community open houses on Barnston the idea of an Agri-Tourism Strategy and Agri-Tourism was discussed in general. Not all current residents are fully supportive of the potential to ‘open up’ Barnston Island to increased agri- tourism-based activities. This is in part due to concerns about lack of parking for visitors, lack of public washrooms and garbage facilities, increased wait times at the ferry, and increased potential for trespass. While an Agri-Tourism Strategy may make sense for certain businesses, it is not supported by all. Several farm managers have existing marketing avenues and some island residents are reluctant to encourage an increase the amount of visitors and traffic visiting the Island given current infrastructure constraints.

Proposed Action

That Metro Vancouver explore potential amendments to the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw in consultation with Barnston Island residents and the Electoral Area Committee to support Agri- tourism, as part of the upcoming zoning bylaw review process, and opt not to develop an Agri- Tourism Strategy for Barnston Island at this time.

6. Investigate ways to increase long-term land tenure to support farming

The viability and suitability of certain agricultural activities is reduced when farmland is only available in short term leases (1 – 5 years). The ability for a farmer to lease land for a long tenure period is important in that tenure security makes investing in the farm in terms of infrastructure (drainage, irrigation, fencing) and equipment less risky and more appealing, and also provides the farmer with leverage when attempting to access financing through a lending institution. This need for tenure

(23)

security is especially important for crops that may take several years to mature, or for livestock-based agriculture. Farmers with long term leases know that resources spent on infrastructure will pay dividends over time; therefore, having sufficient tenure on a piece of land to enable return on investment is important for financial viability.

Currently, more than half of Barnston Island is owned by a non-farming landowner who does not reside on the Island. This land is mainly being leased out at terms of 5 years or less. This is a change from previous tenures whereby most of the island was owned by farmers or was made available to farmers for long term agricultural leases (i.e. longer than 10 years).

Proposed Action

As Metro Vancouver undertakes policy research related to land-tenure and farming as part of its Regional Planning function, that Metro Vancouver explore ways that this information could be applied to Barnston Island and bring back potential initiatives for Electoral Area Committee and Board consideration as appropriate.

7. Promote Metro Vancouver agricultural policies and regulations

The policy framework that sets the stage for supporting agriculture on Barnston Island is situated in the Local Government Act, Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future (Metro 2040), the regional growth strategy, the Electoral Area A Official Community Plan (OCP) and the Barnston Island Zoning Bylaw. These documents are critical to the way in which local governments can support local food production and increase farm viability.

Both Metro 2040 and the OCP provide long-term visions and strategies for future land use, development, and servicing, among other areas regulated by the Local Government Act. The zoning bylaw regulates and permits uses within these land uses, or zones, representing current land use.

Both the OCP and the zoning bylaw are described in greater detail below.

The consultant noted that new farmers and emerging farm operators may be unaware of the resources available through Metro Vancouver, and may have difficulty navigating the myriad of policies and regulations.

Proposed Action

That Metro Vancouver continue to promote agricultural policies and regulation through existing communication channels (e.g. through resident inquiries, Electoral Area A bi-annual bulletins, and the Metro Vancouver website).

8. Erect agricultural signage

The consultant report notes that many visitors to Barnston Island are unaware of the island’s geography, the farming community and the lack of public amenities available. The Agricultural Viability Study identifies opportunities to inform and support the farming agriculture community through improved signage on the Island.

(24)

For example, signs could include additional maps, emergency contact numbers, local farm locations (if desired), locations of washrooms facilities, approximate travel times and distances, bylaw enforcement contacts, park information, public education for new visitors, history of the Island, points of interest, and Katzie First Nation IR boundary. Signs could be developed to discourage trespass and indicate other areas where the public is discouraged from accessing (e.g. Katzie First Nation Reserve lands). The viability study suggests that consideration be given to erecting signs along the road to the ferry terminal in Surrey regarding information on Barnston Island agriculture.

Proposed Action

That Metro Vancouver advance the development of agriculture supportive signage, including local community and Katzie First Nation involvement in reviewing messaging.

ALTERNATIVES

1. That the MVRD Board endorse the actions as presented in the report dated June 14, 2019, titled

“Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study – Action Plan” in response to the recommendations in the Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study”.

2. That the MVRD Board endorse the actions as amended in the report dated June 14, 2019, titled

“Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study – Action Plan” in response to the recommendations in the Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study”.

3. That the Electoral Area Committee receive for information the report, dated June 14, 2019, titled

“Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study – Action Plan” and provide alternate direction to staff.

If the Board chooses Alternative 1, the supported recommendations will be undertaken through the regular workplan, and if there are costs and additional resources required, these will be considered as part of the 2020 budget and five-year financial planning process.

In February 2019, the MVRD Board directed staff to report back on an action plan for the eight recommendations contained in the Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study. The intent of the recommendations and proposed follow up actions is to improve and enhance the viability of farming on Barnston Island. This report provides summary analysis and proposed actions for each of the eight recommendations. The proposed actions responding to each of the study’s recommendations are provided below:

1. That Metro Vancouver continue dialogue with the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to improve the access to the Island, and follow up on the recommendations as laid out in the Barnston Island Agriculture Viability Study.

2. That Metro Vancouver continue to collaborate and share information with the Katzie First Nation and consult with the Nation when developing and implementing local land use plans.

(25)

3. That Metro Vancouver opt not to develop a drainage study at this time given Metro Vancouver does not have a local government drainage function for Barnston Island (or any other part of Electoral Area A).

4. That Metro Vancouver continue to follow the recently adopted Electoral Area A Bylaw Enforcement Policy (Reference 2) to guide enforcement efforts related to derelict residences on Barnston Island.

5. That Metro Vancouver explore potential amendments to the Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw in consultation with Barnston Island residents and the Electoral Area Committee to support Agri-tourism, as part of the upcoming zoning bylaw review process, and opt not to develop an Agri-Tourism Strategy for Barnston Island at this time.

6. As Metro Vancouver undertakes policy research related to land-tenure and farming as part of its Regional Planning function, that Metro Vancouver explore ways that this information could be applied to Barnston Island and bring back potential initiatives for Electoral Area Committee and Board consideration as appropriate.

7. That Metro Vancouver continue to promote agricultural policies and regulation through existing communication channels (e.g. through resident inquiries, Electoral Area A bi-annual bulletins, and the Metro Vancouver website).

8. That Metro Vancouver advance the development of agriculture supportive signage, including local community and Katzie First Nation involvement in reviewing messaging.

Several of the actions can be completed with existing resources; however, some actions have cost and resource implications and will be addressed through the 5-year financial plan and 2020 budget process. Staff recommend Alternative 1.

References

1. The Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study 2. Electoral Area A Bylaw Enforcement Policy

30071510

(26)

From: Marcin Pachcinski, Division Manager, Electoral Area and Environment Regional Planning and Electoral Area Services

Subject: Manager’s Report RECOMMENDATION

That the Electoral Area Committee receive for information the report dated June 20, 2019, titled

“Manager’s Report”.

ELECTORAL AREA COMMITTEE 2019 WORK PLAN

The attachment to this report sets out the Committee’s Work Plan for 2019. The status of work program elements is indicated as pending, in progress, ongoing or complete. The listing is updated as needed to include new issues that arise, items requested by the Committee, and changes to the schedule.

HOWE SOUND COMMUNITY FORUM

The bi-annual Howe Sound Community Forum was held on Friday, April 26 on Gambier Island. The Forum brings together representatives from government, First Nations and various stakeholder groups to discuss issues and projects of interest to Howe Sound communities.

The Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations presented on the Howe Sound Cumulative Effects Project at this Forum. The Ministry has completed five monitoring reports that look at the current condition of five environmental/wildlife values (Aquatic Ecosystems-Watershed Condition, Forest Visual Quality, Grizzly Bear, Roosevelt Elk, Marbled Murrelet) and various supplemental terrestrial factors in the Howe Sound area. Collectively, these reports can give an indication of the general state of the terrestrial environment in the Howe Sound area.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada presented on phase two of the Glass Sponge Reef Conservation Initiative (glass sponge reefs exist around Bowyer Island and Passage Island). Ruth Simons, Lead, provided an update on the Howe Sound Biosphere Region Initiative first introduced to the Forum in 2016.

Click here for a full summary of the topics (including presentations) discussed the April forum. The next forum will be held in October 2019 in the District of Squamish.

ELECTORAL AREA A HOUSING NEEDS REPORT

In May 2018, new provincial legislation amended the Local Government Act and the Vancouver Charter establishing a requirement for local governments to complete Housing Needs Reports. The Housing Needs Reports are intended to strengthen the ability of local governments to understand

5.4

(27)

Manager’s Report Electoral Area Committee Regular Meeting Date: July 3, 2019 Page 2 of 2

29287501

and respond to the long‐term, community-specific housing needs, and to ensure that local policies, plans, and development decisions are prepared based on recent documented data.

Components of the Housing Needs Reports

There are two key components of the Housing Needs Reports:

1. Part 1: Information Collection (Data collection)

2. Part 2: Report Content (Based on analysis of the required information collected in Part 1)

Part 1 of the Housing Needs Reports is a data collection exercise requiring that local governments collect approximately 50 distinct kinds of data that will act as a baseline for determining current and projected housing needs.

Part 2 is intended to communicate the key findings based on an analysis of the required information collected in Part 1 of the reports. This includes the estimated number of units currently needed and anticipated (over the following 5 years) in each community, by type (i.e. number of bedrooms); the number of households in core housing need and extreme core housing need; and a narrative describing the current and anticipated key areas of local need (for affordable housing, rental housing, special needs housing, seniors housing, family housing, and shelters and housing for those at risk or experiencing homelessness).

In the case of regional districts, Housing Needs Reports are required for any electoral area within a district (except for electoral areas with a population of less than 100). The first Housing Needs Reports are due in April 2022, and every five years thereafter.

As a regional district with an established function to acquire and compile regional data, Metro Vancouver already disseminates data products such as the regional Housing Demand Estimates and housing projections as a service to its member jurisdictions. Because Metro Vancouver acts as the local government for Electoral Area A, Metro Vancouver will prepare both Part 1 and 2 of the Electoral Area A Housing Needs Report and will present the report to the Electoral Area Committee, and publish it on the Metro Vancouver website, when it is completed.

RECENT WILDFIRE NEAR MONTIZAMBERT WYND IN HOWE SOUND

In the early morning hours of Sunday, June 23, 2019, a wildfire broke out across Highway 99 from Montizambert Wynd, a waterfront community on the Howe Sound mainland in Electoral Area A.

Metro Vancouver Emergency Management, Water Services, and Electoral Area Services staff worked in coordination with first responders to support BC Wildfire Services’ response to the fire. The response included helicopters, air tankers, and ground crews. Metro Vancouver Emergency Management staff went door-to-door to residences in the Montizambert Wynd community to inform them of the active fire situation and advise them that they were not in danger. Emails and phone calls were also used to update residents of Montizambert Wynd, Strachan Point, and Ocean Point throughout the incident. The fire was completely contained by the morning of Tuesday, June 25.

Attachment:

Electoral Area Committee 2019 Work Plan

(28)

Electoral Area Committee 2019 Work Plan Report Date: June 20, 2019

Priorities

1^stQuarter Status

2019 Electoral Area A Committee Work Plan Complete

Barnston Island Agricultural Viability Study Complete

Liquor licence, development variance permit, and rezoning applications, as applicable

Complete 2^ndQuarter

Electoral Area Zoning Bylaw Review and Public Consultation Process In Progress Electoral Area A Building Inspection Service Review - Update In Progress Consideration of Future Grant Projects in Electoral Area A (outside of UBC/UEL) Pending Liquor licence, development variance permit, and rezoning applications, as

applicable

Complete 3^rdQuarter

Status Update on Electoral Area Zoning Bylaw Review and Public Consultation Process Pending Report on Emergency Management Activities in Electoral Area A Pending

Indian Arm and Pitt Lake Clean-up Events In Progress

Fire Service in Electoral Area A (outside of UBC/UEL) – History and Options Pending

2020 Electoral Area A Annual Budget and Work Plan Pending

Liquor licence, development variance permit, and rezoning applications, as applicable

Pending 4^thQuarter

Electoral Area Zoning Bylaw and public consultation process Pending Electoral Area A Building Inspection Service – Proposed Bylaw Amendments Pending Electoral Area Zoning Bylaw Review – Consideration of Bylaw Amendments Pending Liquor licence, development variance permit, and rezoning applications, as

applicable

Pending